Skip to main content
Log in

Method for Meteorological Early Warning of Precipitation-Induced Landslides Based on Deep Neural Network

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The meteorological early warning model of precipitation-induced landslides is a significant yet challenging task, due to the complexity and uncertainty of various influence factors. Generally, the existing machine learning methods have the drawbacks of poor learning ability and weak capability of feature extraction. Inspired by deep learning technology, we propose a deep belief network (DBN) approach with Softmax classifier and Dropout mechanism for meteorological early warning of precipitation-induced landslides to overcome these problems. With the powerful nonlinear mapping ability of DBN when training a large number of sample data, we use the greedy unsupervised learning algorithm of DBN to extract the intrinsic characteristics of landslide factors. Then, to further improve prediction accuracy of landslides, the Softmax classifier is added to the top layer of DBN neural network. Moreover, the Dropout mechanism is introduced in the training process to reduce the prediction error caused by the over-fitting phenomena. Taking Wenchuan earthquake affected area for example, after analysis of the factors influencing landslide disasters, the meteorological early warning model of landslides based on Dropout DBN-Softmax is established. Compared with the existing BP neural network algorithm and BP algorithm based on Particle Swarm Optimizer (PSO-BP) algorithm, the experimental results show that the new approach proposed has the advantages of higher accuracy and better technological performances than the former algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gao ZK, Jin ND (2012) A directed weighted complex network for characterizing chaotic dynamics from time series. Nonlin Anal Real World Appl 13(2):947–952

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvioli M, Baum RL (2016) Parallelization of the TRIGRS model for rainfall-induced landslides using the message passing interface. Environ Modell Softw 81:122–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71(3/4):289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pham BT, Pradhan B, Bui DT, Prakash I, Dholakia MB (2016) A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environ Modell Softw 84:240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colkesen I, Sahin EK, Kavzoglu T (2016) Susceptibility mapping of shallow landslides using kernel-based Gaussian process, support vector machines and logistic regression. J Afr Earth Sci 118:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kornejady A, Ownegh M, Bahremand A (2017) Landslide susceptibility assessment using maximum entropy model with two different data sampling methods. Catena 152:144–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerolymos N, Gazetas G (2007) A model for grain-crushing-induced landslides—application to Nikawa, Kobe 1995. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(9):803–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen YC, Chang KT, Chiu YJ, Lau SM, Lee HY (2013) Quantifying rainfall controls on catchment-scale landslide erosion in Taiwan. Earth Surf Process Landf 38(4):372–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akcali E, Arman H (2013) Landslide early warning system suggestion based on landslide—rainfall threshold: Trabzon Province. Teknik dergi 24(1):6307–6332

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen XL, Liu CG, Yu L, Lin CX (2014) Critical acceleration as a criterion in seismic landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 217:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pistocchi A, Luzi L, Napolitano P (2002) The use of predictive modeling techniques for optimal exploitation of spatial databases: a case study in landslide hazard mapping with expert system-like methods. Environ Geol 41(7):765–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Soowoong K, Bogun P, Bong SS, Seungjoon Y (2016) Deep belief network based statistical feature learning for fingerprint liveness detection. Pattern Recognit Lett 77:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guillermo LG, Lucas CU, Mónica GL, Pablo MG (2016) Deep learning for plant identification using vein morphological patterns. Comput Electron Agric 127:418–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geng J, Wang HY, Fan JC, Ma SR (2017) Deep supervised and contractive neural network for SAR image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(4):2442–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao ZK, Cai Q, Yang YX, Dang WD, Zhang SS (2016) Multiscale limited penetrable horizontal visibility graph for analyzing nonlinear time series. Sci Rep 6:35622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hinton GE, Deng L, Yu D, Dahl E, Mohsmed A, Jaitly N, Senior A, Vanhoucke V, Nguyen P, Sainath TN, Kingsbury B (2012) Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: the shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Process Mag 29(6):82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ronao CA, Cho SB (2016) Human activity recognition with smartphone sensors using deep learning neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 59:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao ZK, Cai Q, Yang YX, Dong N, Zhang SS (2017) Visibility graph from adaptive optimal kernel time-frequency representation for classification of epileptiform EEG. Int J Neural Syst 27(4):1750005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shim H, Lee S (2015) Multi-channel electromyography pattern classification using deep belief networks for enhanced user experience. J Central South Univ 22(5):1801–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Papa JP, Scheirer W, Cox DD (2016) Fine-tuning deep belief networks using harmony search. Appl Soft Comput 46:875–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hinton GE, Osindero S, Teh YW (2006) A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computat 18(7):1527–1554

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Shen FR, Chao J, Zhao JX (2015) Forecasting exchange rate using deep belief networks and conjugate gradient method. Neurocomputing 167:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu HB, Gu XD (2015) Towards dropout training for convolutional neural networks. Neural Netw 71:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the Project in 2014 by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Authorized Number: 41401449) and the University science and technology Project (No. J16LH05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, L., Xiang, Ly. Method for Meteorological Early Warning of Precipitation-Induced Landslides Based on Deep Neural Network. Neural Process Lett 48, 1243–1260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-017-9778-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-017-9778-0

Keywords

Navigation