Skip to main content
Log in

Lamb Meat Quality Assessment by Support Vector Machines

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The correct assessment of meat quality (i.e., to fulfill the consumer’s needs) is crucial element within the meat industry. Although there are several factors that affect the perception of taste, tenderness is considered the most important characteristic. In this paper, a Feature Selection procedure, based on a Sensitivity Analysis, is combined with a Support Vector Machine, in order to predict lamb meat tenderness. This real-world problem is defined in terms of two difficult regression tasks, by modeling objective (e.g. Warner–Bratzler Shear force) and subjective (e.g. human taste panel) measurements. In both cases, the proposed solution is competitive when compared with other neural (e.g. Multilayer Perceptron) and Multiple Regression approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FS:

Feature Selection

MR:

Multiple Regression

NN:

Neural Network

SVM:

Support Vector Machine

STP:

Sensory Taste Panel

WBS:

Warner–Bratzler Shear

References

  1. Arvanitoyannis I., Houwelingen-Koukaliaroglou M. (2003), Implementation of chemometrics for quality control and authentication of meat and meat products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 43(2): 173–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bengio Y., Delalleau O., Le Roux N. (2005). The curse of dimensionality for local kernel machines. Technical Report 1258, Department IRO, Universitsité de Montréal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bi J. and Bennett, K. Regression error characteristic curves. In: Proceedings of 20 th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Washington DC, USA (2003).

  4. Chang, C., Hsu, C. and Lin, C. A practical guide to support vector classification. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/ cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf. Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University (2003).

  5. Cherkassy V., Ma Y. (2004), Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression. Neural Networks 17(1): 113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diéz, J., Bayón, G., Quevedo, J., Coz, J., Luaces, O., Alonso, J. and Bahamonde, A. Discovering relevancies in very difficult regression problems: applications to sensory data analysis. In Proceedings of ECAI, 993–994, Valencia, Spain, IOS Press (2004).

  7. Flexer, A. Statistical evaluation of neural networks experiments: Minimum requirements and current practice. In Proceedings of the 13th European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, vol 2, pp. 1005–1008, Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna (1996).

  8. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer-Verlag, NY

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Haykin S. (1999). Neural Networks – A Compreensive Foundation. 2nd edn, Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hill B., Jones S., Robertson W., Major I. (2000), Neural network modeling of carcass measurements to predict beef tenderness. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80: 311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huffman K., Miller M., Hoover L., Wu C., Brittin H., Ramsey C. (1997), Effect of beef tenderness on consumer satisfaction with steaks consumed in the home and restaurant. Journal of Animal Science 74(1): 91–97

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kewley R., Embrechts M., Breneman C. (2000), Data strip mining for the virtual design of pharmaceuticals with neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 11(3): 668–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohavi, R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Montreal, Canada (1995).

  14. Lavrac N., Motoda H., Fawcett T., Langley P., Adriaans P. (2004), Introduction: lessons learned from data mining applications and collaborative problem solving. Machine Learning 57(1–2): 13–32

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Li J., Tan J., Martz F., Heymann H. (1999), Image texture features as indicators of beef tendernes. Meat Science 53(1): 17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitra S., Pal S., Mitra P. (2002), Data mining in soft computing framework: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 13(1): 3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org, ISBN 3-900051-07-0 (2005).

  18. Smola A., Scholkopf B. (1998). A tutorial on support vector regression. Technical Report NC2-TR-1998-030, University of London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  19. Turban E., Aronson J., Liang T. (2004). Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vapnik V. (1999). The Nature of Satistical Learning Theory, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Cortez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortez, P., Portelinha, M., Rodrigues, S. et al. Lamb Meat Quality Assessment by Support Vector Machines. Neural Process Lett 24, 41–51 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-006-9009-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-006-9009-6

Keywords

Navigation