Skip to main content
Log in

Modifications of EEG Related to Directed Perception and Analysis of Olfactory Information in Humans

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

We recorded EEG in adult volunteers in the course of perception of smells of plant essential oils under conditions of directed attention. It was found that perception of olfactory information, even in the case of mild intensity of the smells inducing no aversive effects, correlates with noticeable changes in the EEG characteristics mostly typical of the reaction of nonspecific EEG activation induced by sensory stimulation and manifested in a decrease in the spectral power, SP, of low-frequency EEG components (6–10 Hz)). In addition, the SP of relatively high-frequency EEG components (11–25 Hz) increased; this effect was most pronounced in the occipital regions of the neocortex. Perception of the smells of essential oils was also accompanied by increases in the coherence of EEG oscillations, most intense in the β2 range (20–25 Hz). Such modifications were maximum in the left temporal/parietal region; this is interpreted as an indication of the special role of these cortical areas in the processes of interaction between the neocortical part of the olfactory analyzer and the respective structures of other analyzer systems. It is hypothesized that such interaction is necessary for the formation of a semantic image of the analyzed stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Е. Makarchouk and A. V. Kaluyev, Olfaction and Behavior [in Russian], KSF, Kyiv (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. H. Zald, J. V. Pardo, “Emotion, olfaction and the human amygdala: Amygdala activation during aversive olfactory stimulation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, No. 8, 4119–4124 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. А. Qureshy, R. Kawasama, M. B. Imran, et al., “Functional mapping of human brain in olfactory processing: A PET study,” J. Neurophysiol., 84, No. 3, 1656–1666 (2000).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. K. V. Sudakov, “Systemic organization of functions in humans,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk, 31, No. 1, 81–96 (2000).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. S. Lorig, ”Human EEG and odor response,” Prog. Neurobiol., 33, Nos. 5/6, 387–398 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. N. Martin, “Human electroencephalographic (EEG) response to olfactory stimulation: Two experiments using the aroma of food,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 30, No. 1, 287–302 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. A. Kryzhanovskii, I. G. Zima, N. Ye. Makarchouk, et al., “Attention state and electrophysiological indices of brain activity in humans upon the action of smelling lemon essential oil,” Fiz. Zhiv. (Biofiz. Dali), 12, No. 1, 111–120 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. G. Zima, S. A. Kryzhanovskii, N. G. Piskorskaya, et al., “EEG characteristics of the relaxed state in humans under conditions of odoration essential oils of melissa and lemon,” Nauk. Visn. Lesya Ukrayinka Volyn. State Univ., No. 7, 30–34 (2005).

  9. N. E. Sviderskaya and T. A. Korol’kova, “Spatial synchronization of the brain electrical processes: problems and solutions,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 47, No. 5, 792–811 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu. K. Kornilov, “Peculiarities of description techniques depending on the object described,” in: Psychological Problems of Rationalization of the Activity [in Russian], Yar. State Univ., Yaroslavl’ (1979), pp. 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. A. Cherninskii, I. G. Zima, N. Ye. Makarchouk, et al., “Peculiarities of subjective estimation of the smells of plant essential oils in humans,” Neironauki, No. 2, 26–28 (2002).

  12. I. G. Zima, S. A. Kryzhanovskii, and A. A. Cherninskii, “Changes in EEG of humans upon perception of smells depending on the level of their subjective pleasant vs unpleasant pattern,” Visn. Taras Shevchenko Kyiv Nat. Univ., Ser. Biol., No. 36, 31–35 (2002).

  13. I. G. Zima, A. A. Cherninskii, N. G. Piskorskaya, and S. A. Kryzhanovskii, “Dependence of changes in the distant synchronization of EEG in the course of perception of hedonically estimated smells on the level of emotional stability in humans,” Visn. Taras Shevchenko Kyiv Nat. Univ., Ser. Biol., No. 39, 30–31 (2003).

  14. A. A. Cherninskii, I. G. Zima, N. Ye. Makarchouk, et al., “Determination of different patterns of activation of the autonomic nervous system in humans by the type of subjective estimate of plant aromates,” Visn. Taras Shevchenko Kyiv Nat. Univ., Ser. Probl. Regul. Physiol. Functions, No. 11, 4–6 (2006).

  15. Т. Е. Mishchouk, Dependence of the Individual/Typological Properties and Efficacy of Intellectual Activity on the Level of Brain Activation (Electroencephalographic Examination) [in Ukrainian], Abstr. of Cand. Thesis, Biol. Sci., Kyiv (1995).

  16. O. S. Vinogradova, V. F. Kitchigina, and C. I. Zenchenko, “Pacemaker neurons of the forebrain medial septal area and theta rhythm of the hippocampus,” Membr. Cell Biol., 11, No. 6, 715–725 (1998).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. R. S. Sainsbury, “Hippocampal theta: a sensory-inhibition theory of function,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 22, No. 2, 237–241 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Naatanen, Attention and Brain Functions [in Russian], Publ. House of the Moscow State Univ., Moscow (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. N. Rusalova and M. B. Kostyunina, “Frequency/amplitude EEG characteristics in the left and right hemispheres upon mental reproduction of emotionally colored images,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 25, No. 5, 50–56 (1999).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. I. Machinskaya, “Neurophysiological mechanisms of voluntary attention (an analytical review),” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 53, No. 2, 133–150 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Klimesch, “EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis,” Brain Res. Rev., 29, Nos. 2/3, 169–195 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. V. N. Kiroyi, Mechanisms of Formation of the Functional State of the Human Brain [in Russian], Publ. House of the Rostov State Univ., Rostov-on-Don (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Herz and J. von Clef, “The influence of verbal labeling on the perception of odors: Evidence for olfactory illusions?” Perception, 30, No. 3, 381–391 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. V. Ya. Sergin, “Perceptive interconnection of sensory events: a hypothesis of inclusive characteristics,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 52, No. 6, 645–655 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. S. Mayberg, J. S. Silva, S. K. Brannan, et al., “The functional neuroanatomy of the placebo effect,” Am. J. Psychiat., 159, No. 5, 728–737 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Kobal and B. Kettenman, “Olfactory functional imaging and physiology,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 36, No. 2, 157–163 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B. M. Pause and K. Krauel, “Chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP) as a key to the psychology of odors,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 36, No. 2, 105–122 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. A. von Stein and J. Sarnthein, “Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: from local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 38, No. 3, 301–313 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Cherninskii.

Additional information

Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 70–78, January–February, 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cherninskii, A.A., Zima, I.G., Makarchouk, N.Y. et al. Modifications of EEG Related to Directed Perception and Analysis of Olfactory Information in Humans. Neurophysiology 41, 63–70 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-009-9078-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-009-9078-z

Keywords

Navigation