Abstract
Objective
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status is recommended used for diagnosis and prognostication of glioblastoma patients. We studied efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with recurrent IDH-wt glioblastoma.
Methods
Consecutive patients treated with SRS for IDH-wt glioblastoma were pooled for this retrospective observational international multi-institutional study from institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation.
Results
Sixty patients (median age 61 years) underwent SRS (median dose 15 Gy and median treatment volume: 7.01 cm3) for IDH-wt glioblastoma. All patients had histories of surgery and chemotherapy with temozolomide, and 98% underwent fractionated radiation therapy. MGMT status was available for 42 patients, of which half of patients had MGMT mutant glioblastomas. During median post-SRS imaging follow-up of 6 months, 52% of patients experienced tumor progression. Median post-SRS progression free survival was 4 months. SRS prescription dose of > 14 Gy predicted longer progression free survival [HR 0.357 95% (0.164–0.777) p = 0.009]. Fifty-percent of patients died during post-SRS clinical follow-up that ranged from 1 to 33 months. SRS treatment volume of > 5 cc emerged as an independent predictor of shorter post-SRS overall survival [HR 2.802 95% CI (1.219–6.444) p = 0.02]. Adverse radiation events (ARE) suggestive of radiation necrosis were diagnosed in 6/55 (10%) patients and were managed conservatively in the majority of patients.
Conclusions
SRS prescription dose of > 14 Gy is associated with longer progression free survival while tumor volume of > 5 cc is associated with shorter overall survival after SRS for IDH-wt glioblastomas. AREs are rare and are typically managed conservatively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H et al (2019) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016. Neuro Oncol 21(Suppl_5):v1–v100. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz150
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330
Sulman EP, Ismaila N, Armstrong TS et al (2017) Radiation therapy for glioblastoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the American Society for Radiation Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol 35(3):361–369. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.70.7562
Tan AC, Ashley DM, López GY, Malinzak M, Friedman HS, Khasraw M (2020) Management of glioblastoma: state of the art and future directions. CA Cancer J Clin 70(4):299–312. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21613
Weller M, van den Bent M, Preusser M et al (2021) EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 18(3):170–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X et al (2008) An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 321(5897):1807–1812. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164382
Yan J-L, Chang C-N, Chuang C-C et al (2013) Long-term follow-up of patients with surgical intractable acromegaly after linear accelerator radiosurgery. J Formos Med Assoc 112(7):416–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2012.01.020
Bunevicius A, Miller J, Parsons M (2020) Isocitrate dehydrogenase, patient-reported outcomes, and cognitive functioning of glioma patients: a systematic review. Curr Oncol Rep 22(12):120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-020-00978-9
Molinaro AM, Taylor JW, Wiencke JK, Wrensch MR (2019) Genetic and molecular epidemiology of adult diffuse glioma. Nat Rev Neurol 15(7):405–417. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0220-2
Gessler F, Bernstock JD, Braczynski A et al (2019) Surgery for glioblastoma in light of molecular markers: impact of resection and MGMT promoter methylation in newly diagnosed IDH-1 wild-type glioblastomas. Neurosurgery 84(1):190–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy049
Kreth F-W, Thon N, Simon M et al (2013) Gross total but not incomplete resection of glioblastoma prolongs survival in the era of radiochemotherapy††This study was presented in part (as oral presentations) at the 10th Meeting of the European Association of NeuroOncology (EANO), 6–9 September 2012, Marseille, France and at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Society for NeuroOncology (SNO), 15–18 November 2012, Washington, DC, USA. Ann Oncol 24(12):3117–3123. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt388
Marchi F, Sahnane N, Cerutti R et al (2019) The impact of surgery in IDH 1 wild type glioblastoma in relation with the MGMT deregulation. Front Oncol 9:1569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01569
Van Den Bent MJ, Erridge S, Vogelbaum MA et al (2019) Second interim and first molecular analysis of the EORTC randomized phase III intergroup CATNON trial on concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in anaplastic glioma without 1p/19q codeletion. JCO 37(15_suppl):2000–2000. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.2000
Kamson DO, Grossman SA (2021) The role of temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed wild-type IDH, unmethylated MGMT p glioblastoma during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Oncol 7(5):675. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6732
Tran AN, Lai A, Li S et al (2014) Increased sensitivity to radiochemotherapy in IDH1 mutant glioblastoma as demonstrated by serial quantitative MR volumetry. Neuro Oncol 16(3):414–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not198
Kong D-S, Lee J-I, Park K, Kim JH, Lim D-H, Nam D-H (2008) Efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery as a salvage treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas. Cancer 112(9):2046–2051. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23402
Niranjan A, Monaco EA, Kano H, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2018) Stereotactic radiosurgery in the multimodality management of residual or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Prog Neurol Surg 31:48–61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000466998
Imber BS, Kanungo I, Braunstein S et al (2017) Indications and efficacy of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma: 2 decades of institutional experience. Neurosurgery 80(1):129–139. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001344
Kim BS, Kong D-S, Seol HJ, Nam D-H, Lee J-I (2017) MGMT promoter methylation status as a prognostic factor for the outcome of gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 133(3):615–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2478-9
Cuneo KC, Vredenburgh JJ, Sampson JH et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery and adjuvant bevacizumab in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(5):2018–2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.074
Sharma M, Schroeder JL, Elson P et al (2018) Outcomes and prognostic stratification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with salvage stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 131(2):489–499. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.JNS172909
Skeie BS, Enger PØ, Brøgger J et al (2012) γ knife surgery versus reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. World Neurosurg 78(6):658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.024
Morris SAL, Zhu P, Rao M et al (2019) Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. World Neurosurg. 127:e523–e533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.193
Bunevicius A, Sheehan JP (2021) Radiosurgery for glioblastoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 32(1):117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2020.08.007
Azoulay M, Chang SD, Gibbs IC et al (2020) A Phase I/II trial of 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with 5-mm margins with concurrent temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: primary outcomes. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa019
Frischer JM, Marosi C, Woehrer A et al (2016) Gamma knife radiosurgery in recurrent glioblastoma. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 94(4):265–272. https://doi.org/10.1159/000448924
Dono A, Amsbaugh M, Martir M et al (2021) Genomic alterations predictive of response to radiosurgery in recurrent IDH-WT glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 152(1):153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03689-0
Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. JCO 28(11):1963–1972. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541
Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L et al (2000) Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90–05. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(2):291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00507-6
Elliott RE, Parker EC, Rush SC et al (2011) Efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery for small-volume recurrent malignant gliomas after initial radical resection. World Neurosurg. 76(1_2):128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.12.053 (discussion 61-62)
Hegi ME, Diserens A-C, Gorlia T et al (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043331
Herrlinger U, Tzaridis T, Mack F et al (2019) Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 393(10172):678–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31791-4
Park K-J, Kano H, Iyer A et al (2012) Salvage gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery followed by bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a case-control study. J Neurooncol 107(2):323–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0744-9
Clark GM, McDonald AM, Nabors LB et al (2014) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: the University of Alabama at Birmingham experience. Neuro-Oncol Pract 1(4):172–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npu028
Bunevicius A, Sheehan D, Lee Vance M, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP (2020) Outcomes of Cushing’s disease following Gamma Knife radiosurgery: effect of a center’s growing experience and era of treatment. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.12.JNS192743
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study design: AB and JS. Material preparation and data collection: all authors. Statistical analysis: AB. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AB and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author Dr. REW is a member of the Novalis Circle Expert Board. Other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was waived given the study design.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bunevicius, A., Pikis, S., Kondziolka, D. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for IDH wild type glioblastoma: an international, multicenter study. J Neurooncol 155, 343–351 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03883-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03883-8