Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extent of re-excision, sequence/timing of salvage re-irradiation, and disease-free interval impact upon clinical outcomes in recurrent/progressive ependymoma

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report clinical outcomes of salvage re-irradiation (re-RT) in recurrent/progressive ependymoma.

Methods

Medical records of patients treated with curative-intent re-RT as multi-modality management for recurrent/progressive ependymoma were analyzed retrospectively. The linear-quadratic model was used to provide estimates of biologically effective dose (BED) of irradiation using an α/β value of 2 for late CNS toxicity for each course of irradiation and summated to derive cumulative BED without correcting for the assumed recovery.

Results

A total of 55 patients (median age 10 years at index diagnosis) treated with curative-intent re-RT between 2010 and 2018 were included. Median time to first recurrence was 29 months with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 16–64 months. Majority (n = 46, 84%) of patients underwent surgical re-excision of recurrent disease. Median interval from first course of irradiation (RT1) to second course (RT2) was 35 months (IQR = 26–66 months) with a median re-RT dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions (range 40–60 Gy), resulting in median cumulative equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction (EQD2) of 106.2 Gy (range 92.4–117.6 Gy). Volume of re-RT was based on location and pattern of relapse, comprising uni-focal (n = 49, 89%), multi-focal (n = 3, 5.5%), or craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in 3 (5.5%) patients respectively. Thirty-six (66%) patients received platinum-based salvage chemotherapy either before or after RT2. At a median follow up of 37 months (range 6–80 months), the Kaplan–Meier estimates of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire study cohort were 40% and 51% respectively. Gross total resection at recurrence; early salvage re-RT (prior to chemotherapy, if any); and longer (> 2 years) disease-free interval (DFI) were associated with better survival outcomes. Salvage re-RT was generally well tolerated with only 3 (5.5%) patients developing symptomatic radiation necrosis necessitating corticosteroids.

Conclusion

Extent of re-excision, sequence/timing of re-RT, and DFI impact upon outcomes in curative-intent, multi-modality salvage therapy for recurrent ependymoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References:s

  1. Leece R, Xu J, Ostrom QT, Chen Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS et al (2017) Global incidence of malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors by histology, 2003–2007. Neuro Oncol 19(11):1553–1564. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox091

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Thorp N, Gandola L (2018) Management of ependymoma in children, adolescent, and young adults. Clin Oncol 31(3):167–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2018.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruda R, Reifenberger G, Frappaz D, Pfister SM, Laprie A, Santarius T et al (2018) EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of ependymal tumors. Neuro Oncol 20(4):445–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ducassou A, Padovani L, Chaltiel L, Bolle S, Habrand JL, Claude L et al (2018) Pediatric localized intracranial ependymomas: a multi-centre analysis of the Society Francais de contre les Cancers de l'Enfant (SFCE) from 2000 to 2013. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 102(1):166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Snider CA, Yang K, Mack SC, Suh JH, Chao ST, Merchant TE et al (2018) Impact of radiation therapy and extent of resection for ependymoma in young children: a population-based study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 65(3):e26880. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Merchant TE, Li C, Xiong X, Kun LE, Boop FA, Sanford RA et al (2009) Conformal radiotherapy after surgery for paediatric ependymoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol 10(3):258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70342-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Merchant TE, Bendel AE, Sabin N, Burger PC, Shaw DW, Chang EM et al (2019) Conformal radiation therapy for pediatric ependymoma, chemotherapy for incompletely resected ependymoma, and observation for completely resected, supratentorial ependymoma. J Clin Oncol 37(12):974–983. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Grill J, Le Deley MC, Gambarelli D, Raquin MA, Couanet D, Pierre-Kahn A et al (2011) Postoperative chemotherapy without irradiation for ependymoma in children under 5 years of age: a multicentre trial of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology. J Clin Oncol 19(5):1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grundy RG, Wilne SH, Weston CL, Robinson KJ, Lashford LS, Ironside JW et al (2007) Primary postoperative chemotherapy withour radiotherapy for intracranial ependymoma in children: the UKCCSG/SIOP prospective study. Lancet Oncol 8(8):696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70208-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pajtler KW, Witt H, Sill M, Jones DT, Hovestadt V, Kratochwil F et al (2015) Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups. Cancer Cell 27(5):728–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Khatua S, Ramaswamy V, Bouffet E (2017) Current therapy and the evolving molecular landscape of paediatric ependymoma. Eur J Cancer 70:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Upadhyaya SA, Robinson GW, Onar-Thomas A, Orr BA, Billups CA, Bowers DC et al (2019) Molecular grouping and outcomes of young children with newly diagnosed ependymoma treated on the multi-institutional SJYC07 trial. Neuro Oncol 21(10):1319–1330. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz069

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Messahel B, Ashley S, Saran F, Ellison D, Ironside J, Phipps K et al (2009) Relapsed intracranial ependymoma in children in the UK: patterns of relapse, survival and therapeutic outcome. Eur J Cancer 45(10):1815–1823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.03.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Massimino M, Miceli R, Giangaspero F, Boscheti L, Modena P, Antonelli M et al (2016) Final results of the second prospective AIEOP protocol for pediatric intracranial ependymoma. Neuro-Oncology 18(10):1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Byer L, Kline CN, Coleman C, Allen IE, Whitaker E et al (2019) A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in pediatric, recurrent ependymoma. J Neurooncol 144(3):445–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03255-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruifrok AC, van der Kogel AJ (1993) A “reappraisal” of the LQ model for the understanding of dose-fractionation in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25(5):926–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(93)90328-s

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Merchant TE, Boop FA, Kun LE, Sanford RA (2008) A retrospective study of surgery and reirradiation for recurrent ependymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(1):87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsang DS, Burghen E, Klimo P, Boop FA, Ellison DW, Merchant TE (2018) Outcomes after reirradiation for recurrent pediatric intracranial ependymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 100(2):507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bouffet E, Hawkins CE, Ballourah W, Taylor MD, Bartels UK, Schoenhoff N et al (2012) Survival benefit for pediatric patients with recurrent ependymoma treated with reirradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(5):1541–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsang DS, Murray L, Ramaswamy V, Zapotocky M, Tabori U, Bartels U et al (2019) Craniospinal irradiation as part of re-irradiation for children with recurrent intracranial ependymoma. Neuro-Oncology 21(4):547–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lobón M, Bautista F, Riet F, Dhermain F, Canale S, Dufour C et al (2016) Re-irradiation of recurrent pediatric ependymoma: modalities and outcomes: a twenty-year survey. Springerplus 5(1):879. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2562-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Regnier E, Laprie A, Ducassou A, Bolle S, Supiot S et al (2019) Re-irradiation of locally recurrent pediatric intracranial ependymoma: experience of the French Society of Children's Cancer. Radiother Oncol 132:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Massimino M, Baretta F, Modena P, Giangaspero F, Chiapparini L, Erbetta A et al (2018) Pediatric intracranial ependymoma: correlating signs and symptoms at recurrence with outcome in the second prospective AIEOP protocol follow-up. J Neurooncol 140(2):457–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2974-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mayer R, Sminia P (2008) Re-irradiation tolerance of the human brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(5):1350–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eaton BR, Chowdhry V, Weaver K, Liu L, Ebb D, MacDonald SM et al (2015) Use of proton therapy for re-irradiation in pediatric intracranial ependymoma. Radiother Oncol 116(2):301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nieder C, Grosu AL, Andratschke NH, Molls M (2006) Update of human spinal cord reirradiation tolerance based on additional data from 38 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(5):1446–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu AK, Foreman NK, Gaspar LE, Trinidad E, Handler MH (2009) Maximally safe resection followed by hypofractionated re-irradiation for locally recurrent ependymoma in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 52(7):804–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.21982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoffman L, Plimpton SR, Foreman N, Stence NV, Hankinson TC, Handler MH et al (2014) Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent ependymoma in children. J Neurooncol 116:107–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1259-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bouffet E, Foreman M (1999) Chemotherapy for intracranial ependymomas. Childs Nerv Syst 15(10):563–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brandes AA, Cavallo G, Reni M, Tosoni A, Nicolardi L, Scopece L et al (2005) A multicenter retrospective study of chemotherapy for recurrent intracranial ependymal tumors in adults by the Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia. Cancer 104(1):143–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No source of funding was involved in this retrospective study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tejpal Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, T., Maitre, M., Gupta, P. et al. Extent of re-excision, sequence/timing of salvage re-irradiation, and disease-free interval impact upon clinical outcomes in recurrent/progressive ependymoma. J Neurooncol 147, 405–415 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03434-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03434-7

Keywords

Navigation