Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of the estrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant on F344 rat prolactinoma models

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between estrogen and prolactinoma is well documented. But the anti-tumor effects of a pure estrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant on prolactinomas, especially in vivo, and the possible mechanisms are still unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fulvestrant and the involvement of the Wnt signaling pathway on rat prolactinoma models. Forty female F344 rat prolactinoma models were established by subcutaneous administration of 10 mg 17β-estradiol for 6 weeks. Rats were intramuscularly injected with fulvestrant (0, 0.5, 3, 20, 40 mg/kg), and tumor size, weight and serum prolactin (PRL) levels were evaluated before and after fulvestrant treatment at 3, 7 and 14 days. Expression of estrogen receptor α (ERα), β-catenin and Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF-1) in prolactinomas was measured using quantitative PCR and western blotting, and methylation of the WIF-1 promoter was investigated using pyrosequencing. Tumor size, weight and serum PRL levels were inhibited in dose-dependent and time-dependent manners after fulvestrant treatments. β-catenin expression was downregulated but WIF-1 expression was upregulated following fulvestrant treatment. The methylation of the CpG site of the WIF-1 promoter was negatively correlated to the expression of WIF-1. In addition, the anti-cell proliferation of fulvestrant on GH3 cells was partly disrupted by Wnt signaling pathway agonist SB 216763. In conclusion, fulvestrant inhibited tumor proliferation and PRL secretion of prolactinomas via ERα, and the Wnt signaling pathway was involved in this anti-tumor effect. Therefore, fulvestrant may be a potential new drug for prolactinomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colao A, Lombardi G (1998) Growth-hormone and prolactin excess. Lancet 352:1455–1461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Serri O, Noiseux D, Robert F, Hardy J (1996) Lactotroph hyperplasia in an estrogen treated male-to-female transsexual patient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3177–3179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lloyd RV (1983) Estrogen-induced hyperplasia and neoplasia in the rat anterior pituitary gland. Am J Pathol 113:198–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ergote I, Abram P (2006) Fulvestrant, a new treatment option for advanced breast cancer: tolerability versus existing agents. Ann Oncol 17:200–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lv H, Li C, Gui S, Sun M, Li D, Zhang Y (2011) Effects of estrogen receptor antagonist on biological behavior and expression of growth factors in the prolactinoma MMQ cell line. J Neurooncol 102:237–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Willert K, Jones KA (2006) Wnt signaling: is the party in the nucleus? Genes Dev 20:1394–1404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giles RH, van Es JH, Clevers H (2003) Caught up in a Wnt storm: Wnt signaling in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1653:1–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Varea O, Garrido JJ, Dopazo A, Mendez P, Garcia-Segura LM, Wandosell F (2009) Estradiol activates beta-catenin dependent transcription in neurons. PLoS ONE 4:e5153

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bai J, Gui S, Zhang Y (2013) Suppression of MMQ cells by fulvestrant: possible mechanism of action and potential application for bromocriptine-resistant prolactinomas. J Clin Neurosci 20:721–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giles A, MadecF Friedrichsen S, Featherstone K, Chambers T, Harper CV, Resch J, Brabant G, Davis JR (2011) Wnt signaling in estrogen-induced lactotroph proliferation. J Cell Sci 124:540–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Colella S, Shen L, Baggerly KA, Issa JP, Krahe R (2003) Sensitive and quantitative universal pyrosequencing methylation analysis of CpG sites. Biotechniques 35:146–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillam MP, Molitch ME, Lombardi G, Colao A (2006) Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas. Endocr Rev 27:485–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kansra S, Yamagata S, Sneade L, Foster L, Ben-Jonathan N (2005) Differential effects of estrogen receptor antagonists on pituitary lactotroph proliferation and prolactin release. Mol Cell Endocrinol 239:27–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li C, Sun Z, Gui S, Liu F, Zhang Y (2009) Effects of fulvestrant, an estrogen receptor antagonist, on MMQ cells and its mechanism. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 30:268–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leng L, Zhang Y (2011) Effects of an estrogen receptor antagonist on proliferation, prolactin secretion and growth factor expression in the MMQ pituitary prolactinoma cell line. J Clin Neurosci 18:1694–1698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wijayaratne AL, McDonnell DP (2001) The human estrogen receptor-alpha is a ubiquitinated protein whose stability is affected differentially by agonists, antagonists, and selective estrogen receptor modulators. J Biol Chem 276:35684–35692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wardell SE, Marks JR, McDonnell DP (2011) The turnover of estrogen receptor a by the selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) fulvestrant is a saturable process that is not required for antagonist efficacy. Biocheml Pharmacol 82:122–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dauvois S, White R, Parker MG (1993) The antiestrogen ICI 182780 disrupts estrogen receptor nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. J Cell Sci 106:1377–1388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mulholland DJ, Dedhar S, Coetzee GA, Nelson CC (2005) Interaction of nuclear receptors with the Wnt/β-Catenin/Tcf signaling axis: Wnt you like to know? Endocr Rev 26:898–915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Semba S, Han SY, Ikeda H, Horii A (2001) Frequent nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin in pituitary adenoma. Cancer 91:42–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Varea O, Arevalo MA, Garrido JJ, Garcia-Segura LM, Wandosell F, Mendez P (2010) Interaction of estrogen receptors with insulin-like growth factor-I and Wnt signaling in the nervous system. Steroids 75:565–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ai L, Tao Q, Zhong S, Fields CR, Kim WJ, Lee MW, Cui Y, Brown KD, Robertson KD (2006) Inactivation of Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF1) expression by epigenetic silencing is a common event in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 27:1341–1348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Elston MS, Gill AJ, Conaglen JV, Clarkson A, Shaw JM, Law AJ, Cook RJ, Little NS, Clifton-Bligh RJ, Robinson BG, McDonald KL (2008) Wnt pathway inhibitors are strongly down-regulated in pituitary tumors. Endocrinol 149:1235–1242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Herman JG, Baylin SB (2003) Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N Engl J Med 349:2042–2054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271627, 30971005, 31000498, 81272522 and 81072075), the Key Program of the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (7121004), and the Ladder Program of the Key Lab in Beijing (Z121107002812031).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yazhuo Zhang.

Additional information

Lei Cao and Hua Gao contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Fig. 1

The cell proliferation and β-catenin expressions of GH3 cells after FVT and SB 216763 treatments. The cell proliferation of GH3 cells was inhibited by fulvestrant (FVT) and promoted by SB 216763(SB). But the anti-cell proliferation effect of FVT on GH3 cells was partly disrupted by SB treatment (a). Also, the mRNA and protein levels of β-catenin were down-regulated by FVT and up-regulated by SB. The downregualtion of β-catenin by fulvestrant could be reversed by SB treatment (b) (**, P < 0.01)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, L., Gao, H., Gui, S. et al. Effects of the estrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant on F344 rat prolactinoma models. J Neurooncol 116, 523–531 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1351-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1351-8

Keywords

Navigation