Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic role for diffusion-weighted imaging of pediatric optic pathway glioma

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optic pathway glioma (OPG) has an unpredictable course, with poor correlation between conventional imaging features and tumor progression. We investigated whether diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) predicts the clinical behavior of these tumors. Twelve children with OPG (median age 2.7 years; range 0.4–6.2 years) were followed for a median 4.4 years with DWI. Progression-free survival (time to requiring therapy) was compared between tumors stratified by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from initial pre-treatment scans. Tumors with baseline ADC greater than 1,400 × 10−6 mm2/s required treatment earlier than those with lower ADC (log-rank p = 0.002). In some cases, ADC increased leading up to treatment, and declined following treatment with surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. Baseline ADC was higher in tumors that eventually required treatment (1,562 ± 192 × 10−6 mm2/s), compared with those conservatively managed (1,123 ± 114 × 10−6 mm2/s) (Kruskal–Wallis test p = 0.013). Higher ADC predicted earlier tumor progression in this cohort and in some cases declined after therapy. Evaluation of OPG with DWI may therefore be useful for predicting tumor behavior and assessing treatment response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Binning MJ, Liu JK, Kestle JRW et al (2007) Optic pathway gliomas: a review. Neurosurg Focus 23:E2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn Y, Cho B-Y, Kim S-K et al (2006) Optic pathway glioma: outcome and prognostic factors in a surgical series. Child Nerv Syst 22:1136–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D et al (1996) MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 161:401–407

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tien RD, Felsberg GJ, Friedman H et al (1994) MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas: value of diffusion-weighted echoplanar pulse sequences. AJR 162:671–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M et al (1999) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:53–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Filippi CG, Bos A, Nickerson JP et al (2012) Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MRDTI) of the optic nerve and radiations at 3T in children with neurofibromatosis type I (NF-1). Pediatr Radiol 42:168–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jost SC, Ackerman JW, Garbow JR et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging as markers of clinical behavior in children with optic pathway glioma. Pediatr Radiol 38:1293–1299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crouse NR, Dahiya S, Gutmann DH (2011) Rethinking pediatric gliomas as developmental brain abnormalities. Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 94. Elsevier/Academic Press, New York

  9. Hoyt WF, Baghdassarian SA (1969) Optic glioma of childhood. Natural history and rationale for conservative management. Br J Ophthalmol 53:793–798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This study was performed without grant support or industry sponsorship. There are no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. M. Lober.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeom, K.W., Lober, R.M., Andre, J.B. et al. Prognostic role for diffusion-weighted imaging of pediatric optic pathway glioma. J Neurooncol 113, 479–483 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1140-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1140-4

Keywords

Navigation