Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of clinically relevant temozolomide dosing schemes in glioblastoma cancer stem cell lines

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness of temozolomide (TMZ) dosing schemes and the “rechallenge” of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with TMZ are controversial. We therefore compared the efficacy of different TMZ dosing schemes against GBM cancer stem cell (CSC) lines in vitro. In O6-methyl-guanidine-methyl-transferase (MGMT)-negative CSC lines, all schedules (1 day on/27 days off, 5 days on/23 days off, 7 days on/7 days off, 21 days on/7 days off, continuous low-dose TMZ) depleted clonogenic cells. In TMZ-resistant CSC lines, the 7 days on/7 days off scheme showed higher toxicity as compared with the other schemes. However, clinically feasible concentrations remained ineffective in highly resistant CSC lines. In addition, none of the schedules induced long-term depletion of clonogenic cells even at the highest concentrations (up to 250 μM). After sublethal TMZ treatment for 5 days, TMZ rechallenge of recovering CSC lines remained effective. Our data advocate CSC lines as in vitro model to address clinical questions. Using this model, our data suggest the effectiveness of TMZ in MGMT-negative CSC lines and support the concept of TMZ rechallenge. The 7 days on/7 days off scheme consistently showed the best activity of all schedules in TMZ-resistant CSC lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beier CP, Schmid C, Gorlia T, Kleinletzenberger C, Beier D, Grauer O, Steinbrecher A, Hirschmann B, Brawanski A, Dietmaier C, Jauch-Worley T, Pietsch T, Proescholdt M, Rummele P, Muigg A, Stockhammer G, Hegi M, Bogdahn U, Hau P (2009) RNOP-09: pegylated liposomal doxorubicine and prolonged temozolomide in addition to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma—a phase II study. BMC Cancer 9:308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, Kros JM, Hainfellner JA, Mason W, Mariani L, Bromberg JE, Hau P, Mirimanoff RO, Cairncross JG, Janzer RC, Stupp R (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brada M, Judson I, Beale P, Moore S, Reidenberg P, Statkevich P, Dugan M, Batra V, Cutler D (1999) Phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide (SCH 52365) for refractory or relapsing malignancies. Br J Cancer 81:1022–1030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosso L, Brock CS, Gallo JM, Saleem A, Price PM, Turkheimer FE, Aboagye EO (2009) A new model for prediction of drug distribution in tumor and normal tissues: pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in glioma patients. Cancer Res 69:120–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinn JA, Jiang SX, Reardon DA, Desjardins A, Vredenburgh JJ, Rich JN, Gururangan S, Friedman AH, Bigner DD, Sampson JH, McLendon RE, Herndon JE, Walker A, Friedman HS (2009) Phase II trial of temozolomide plus O-6-benzylguanine in adults with recurrent, temozolomide-resistant malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 27:1262–1267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beier D, Rohrl S, Pillai DR, Schwarz S, Kunz-Schughart LA, Leukel P, Proescholdt M, Brawanski A, Bogdahn U, Trampe-Kieslich A, Giebel B, Wischhusen J, Reifenberger G, Hau P, Beier CP (2008) Temozolomide preferentially depletes cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Cancer Res 68:5706–5715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wedge SR, Porteous JK, May BL, Newlands ES (1996) Potentiation of temozolomide and BCNU cytotoxicity by O-6-benzylguanine: a comparative study in vitro. Br J Cancer 73:482–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Margison GP, Povey AC, Kaina B, Koref MFS (2003) Variability and regulation of O-6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Carcinogenesis 24:625–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tolcher AW, Gerson SL, Denis L, Geyer C, Hammond LA, Patnaik A, Goetz AD, Schwartz G, Edwards T, Reyderman L, Statkevich P, Cutler DL, Rowinsky EK (2003) Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules. Br J Cancer 88:1004–1011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Spiro TP, Liu L, Majka S, Haaga J, Willson JK, Gerson SL (2001) Temozolomide: the effect of once- and twice-a-day dosing on tumor tissue levels of the DNA repair protein O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase. Clin Cancer Res 7:2309–2317

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Cavallo G, Bertorelle R, Gioia V, Franceschi E, Biscuola M, Blatt V, Crino L, Ermani M (2006) Temozolomide 3 weeks on and 1 week off as first-line therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: phase II study from gruppo italiano cooperativo di neuro-oncologia (GICNO). Br J Cancer 95:1155–1160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wick A, Felsberg J, Steinbach JP, Herrlinger U, Platten M, Blaschke B, Meyermann R, Reifenberger G, Weller M, Wick W (2007) Efficacy and tolerability of temozolomide in an alternating weekly regimen in patients with recurrent glioma. J Clin Oncol 25:3357–3361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spence AM, Kiem HP, Partap S, Schuetze S, Silber JR, Peterson RA (2006) Complications of a temozolomide overdose: a case report. J Neurooncol 80:57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blough MD, Westgate MR, Beauchamp D, Kelly JJ, Stechishin O, Ramirez AL, Weiss S, Cairncross JG (2010) Sensitivity to temozolomide in brain tumor initiating cells. Neuro Oncol 12(7):756–760

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mihaliak AM, Gilbert CA, Li L, Daou MC, Moser RP, Reeves A, Cochran BH, Ross AH (2010) Clinically relevant doses of chemotherapy agents reversibly block formation of glioblastoma neurospheres. Cancer Lett 296:168–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bleau AM, Hambardzumyan D, Ozawa T, Fomchenko EI, Huse JT, Brennan CW, Holland EC (2009) PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathway regulates the side population phenotype and ABCG2 activity in glioma tumor stem-like cells. Cell Stem Cell 4:226–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu G, Yuan X, Zeng Z, Tunici P, Ng H (2006) Abdulkadir IR, Lu L, Irvin D, Black KL, Yu JS: Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer 5:67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pollard SM, Yoshikawa K, Clarke ID, Danovi D, Stricker S, Russell R, Bayani J, Head R, Lee M, Bernstein M, Squire JA, Smith A, Dirks P (2009) Glioma stem cell lines expanded in adherent culture have tumor-specific phenotypes and are suitable for chemical and genetic screens. Cell Stem Cell 4:568–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li A, Walling J, Kotliarov Y, Center A, Steed ME, Ahn SJ, Rosenblum M, Mikkelsen T, Zenklusen JC, Fine HA (2008) Genomic changes and gene expression profiles reveal that established glioma cell lines are poorly representative of primary human gliomas. Mol Cancer Res 6:21–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Beier D, Hau P, Proescholdt M, Lohmeier A, Wischhusen J, Oefner PJ, Aigner L, Brawanski A, Bogdahn U, Beier CP (2007) CD133+ and CD133− glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cells show differential growth characteristics and molecular profiles. Cancer Res 67:4010–4015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perry JR, Belanger K, Mason WP, Fulton D, Kavan P, Easaw J, Shields C, Kirby S, Macdonald DR, Eisenstat DD, Thiessen B, Forsyth P, Pouliot JF (2010) Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. J Clin Oncol 28:2051–2057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roos WP, Batista LF, Naumann SC, Wick W, Weller M, Menck CF, Kaina B (2007) Apoptosis in malignant glioma cells triggered by the temozolomide-induced DNA lesion O6-methylguanine. Oncogene 26:186–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirose Y, Berger MS, Pieper RO (2001) p53 effects both the duration of G2/M arrest and the fate of temozolomide-treated human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res 61:1957–1963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Perry JR, Rizek P, Cashman R, Morrison M, Morrison T (2008) Temozolomide rechallenge in recurrent malignant glioma by using a continuous temozolomide schedule: the “rescue” approach. Cancer 113:2152–2157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee J, Kotliarova S, Kotliarov Y, Li A, Su Q, Donin NM, Pastorino S, Purow BW, Christopher N, Zhang W, Park JK, Fine HA (2006) Tumor stem cells derived from glioblastomas cultured in bFGF and EGF more closely mirror the phenotype and genotype of primary tumors than do serum-cultured cell lines. Cancer Cell 9:391–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lottaz C, Beier D, Meyer K, Kumar P, Hermann A, Schwarz J, Junker M, Oefner PJ, Bogdahn U, Wischhusen J, Spang R, Storch A, Beier CP (2010) Transcriptional profiles of CD133+ and CD133− glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cell lines suggest different cells of origin. Cancer Res 70:2030–2040

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD, Stupp R, Hegi M, Jaeckle KA, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Won M, Blumenthal DT, Mahajan A, Schultz CJ, Erridge SC, Brown PD, Chakravarti A, Curran WJ, Mehta MP (2011) RTOG 0525: a randomized phase III trial comparing standard adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) with a dose-dense (dd) schedule in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 29:15_suppl

  29. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Neyns B, Goldbrunner R, Schlegel U, Clement PM, Grabenbauer GG, Ochsenbein AF, Simon M, Dietrich PY, Pietsch T, Hicking C, Tonn JC, Diserens AC, Pica A, Hermisson M, Krueger S, Picard M, Weller M (2010) Phase I/IIa study of cilengitide and temozolomide with concomitant radiotherapy followed by cilengitide and temozolomide maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 28:2712–2718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Beier D (2011) Schulz JB, Beier CP: Chemoresistance of glioblastoma cancer stem cells - much more complex than expected. Mol Cancer 10:128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wick W, Steinbach JP, Kuker WM, Dichgans J, Bamberg M, Weller M (2004) One week on/one week off: a novel active regimen of temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma. Neurology 62:2113–2115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant of the Bavarian Research Foundation to D.B., by the START Program (RWTH Aachen, Medical School) to D.B., the NGFNplus BTN (subproject 7A and B no. 01GS0887) to C.P.B. and P.H., and by the career award for young female scientists (RWTH Aachen, Medical School) to D.B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph P. Beier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beier, D., Schriefer, B., Brawanski, K. et al. Efficacy of clinically relevant temozolomide dosing schemes in glioblastoma cancer stem cell lines. J Neurooncol 109, 45–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0878-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0878-4

Keywords

Navigation