Skip to main content
Log in

Refining endpoints in brain tumor clinical trials

  • Methods and Clinical Tools for Outcome Assessments
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As targeted therapies advance treatment for brain tumors, standard clinical trial endpoints of survival, progression free survival and radiographic response have become insufficient to capture clinical benefit. Brain cancer is a malignancy with neurodegenerative features. In this setting prolongation of life and/or radiographic stability are less clinically meaningful if neurocognitive function substantially declines. Hence evaluation of new therapeutic strategies should routinely include periodic assessment of neurocognitive function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meyers CA, Hess KR, Yung WKA, Levin VA (2000) Cognitive function as a predictor of survival in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 18:646–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyers CA, Hess KR (2003) Multifaceted end points in brain tumor clinical trials: cognitive deterioration precedes MRI progression. Neuro Oncol 5:89–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1943–1972

    Google Scholar 

  4. O’Shaughnessy JA, Wittes RE, Burke G et al (1991) Commentary concerning demonstration of safety and efficacy of investigational anticancer agents in clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 9:2225–2232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown PD, Jensen AW, Felton SJ et al (2006) Detrimental effects of tumor progression on cognitive function of patients with high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 24:5427–5433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wefel JS, Cloughsey TF, Zazzali JL et al (2011) Neurocognitive function in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Neuro Oncol 13:660–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyers CA, Brown PD (2006) The role and relevance of neurocognitive assessment in clinical trials of patients with central nervous system tumors. J Clin Oncol 24:1305–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyers CA, Wefel JS (2003) The use of the Mini Mental State Examination to assess cognitive functioning in cancer trials: no ifs, ands, buts, or sensitivity. J Clin Oncol 21:3557–3558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meyers CA, Smith JA, Bezjak A et al (2004) Neurocognitive function and progression in patients with brain metastases treated with whole brain radiation and motexafin gadolinium: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 22:157–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolfson AH, Bae K, Komaki R et al (2011) Primary analysis of a phase II randomized trial radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) 0212: impact of different total doses and schedules of prophylactic cranial irradiation on chronic neurotoxicity and quality of life for patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Correa DD, Maron L, Harder H et al (2007) Cognitive functions in primary central nervous system lymphoma: literature review and assessment guidelines. Ann Oncol 18:1145–1151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wefel JS, Vardy J, Ahles T, Schagen SB (2011) International Cognition and Cancer Task Force recommendations to harmonise studies of cognitive function in patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol 12:703–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L, Brandt J (1998) Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised: normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability. Clin Neuropsychol 12:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Benton AL, KdeS Hamsher (1989) Multilingual aphasia examination. AJA Associates, Iowa City

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW (2004) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina A. Meyers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyers, C.A., Rock, E.P. & Fine, H.A. Refining endpoints in brain tumor clinical trials. J Neurooncol 108, 227–230 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0813-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0813-8

Keywords

Navigation