Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Time course of imaging changes of GBM during extended bevacizumab treatment

  • Clinical-Patient Studies
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are morphologically heterogeneous tumors, with varying amounts of necrosis, and edema. Previous studies have shown that treatments incorporating the VEGF antibody bevacizumab can reduce edema and tumor burden in GBM. Additionally it has been suggested that bevacizumab regimen treatment reduces the percent of tumoral necrosis. Therefore we sought to (1) determine the time course of change in necrosis, tumor, and edema volume in patients who respond to bevacizumab regimen treatment and (2) determine if GBM that progress following a response to bevacizumab regimen treatment are morphologically different from their appearance at prior tumor progression. Therefore, we retrospectively assessed tumor, necrosis, and edema volumes on MRI scans from 15 patients with recurrent GBM who responded to bevacizumab regimen treatment, and had extended (>7 month) follow-up. We found that the median time to best tumor response was 158 days (range, 16–261, SD = 63). The median best response was 72.1% reduction in tumor volume and 72.8% reduction in peritumoral edema. Most tumors (77.8%) showed resolution of necrotic areas. The relative reduction of edema and necrosis was sustained, even in patients (n = 7) who developed tumor progression. Thus the mean ratio of edema-to-tumor volume at progression on bevacizumab regimen treatment was 38.4% lower than that for the same tumors seen on progression scans following prior chemotherapy. The percentage of necrotic tumor also was diminished following progression on bevacizumab regimen treatment. These findings illustrate the time course of changes in edema and tumor volume with prolonged bevacizumab regimen treatment, and support the conclusion that the morphology of recurrent GBM following bevacizumab regimen therapy is distinct from that on other chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GBM:

Glioblastoma multiforme

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

TTR:

Time to partial tumor response

TTP:

Time to tumor progression

RT:

Radiation therapy

RECIST:

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for GBM. N Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang H, Held-Feindt J, Buhl R et al (2005) Expression of VEGF and its receptors in different brain tumors. Neurol Res 27(4):371–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hicklin DJ, Ellis LM (2005) Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol 23:1011–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pope WB, Sayre J, Perlina A et al (2005) MR imaging correlates of survival in patients with high-grade gliomas. Am J Neuroradiol 26:2466–2474

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rong Y, Durden DL, Van Meir EG, Brat DJ (2006) ‘Pseudopalisading’ necrosis in glioblastoma: a familiar morphologic feature that links vascular pathology, hypoxia, and angiogenesis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 65(6):529–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou YH, Tan F, Hess KR, Yung WK (2003) The expression of PAX6, PTEN, vascular endothelial growth factor, and epidermal growth factor receptor in gliomas: relationship to tumor grade and survival. Clin Cancer Res 15:3369–3375

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR et al (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95(2):190–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Duda DG, Batchelor TT, Willett CG et al (2007) VEGF-targeted cancer therapy strategies: current progress, hurdles and future prospects. Trends Mol Med 13(6):223–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pope WB, Lai A, Nghiemphu P et al (2006) MRI in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy. Neurology 66:1258–1260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE et al (2007) Phase II trial of bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res 13(4):1253–1259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rees JH, Smirniotopoulos JG, Jones RV, Wong K (1996) Glioblastoma multiforme: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 16:1413–1438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sorenson AG, Patel S, Harmath C et al (2001) Comparison of diameter and perimeter methods for tumor volume calculation. J Clin Oncol 19:551–557

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galanis E, Buckner JC, Maurer MJ et al (2006) Validation of neuroradiologic response assessment in gliomas: measurement by RECIST, two-dimensional, computer-assisted tumor area, and computer-assisted tumor volume methods. Neuro-Oncology 8:156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah GD, Kesari S, Xu R, Batchelor TT, O’Neill AM, Hochberg FH, Levy B, Bradshaw J, Wen PY (2006) Comparison of linear and volumetric criteria in assessing tumor response in adult high-grade gliomas. Neuro-Oncology 8:38–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Therasse P (2002) Evaluation of response: new and standard criteria. Eur Soc Ann Oncol 13(Suppl 4):127–129

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cloughesy TF, Filka E, Kuhn J et al (2003) Two studies evaluating irinotecan treatment for recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. Cancer 97:2381–2386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ (1999) Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 17:2572–2578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. de Wit MCY, de Bruin HG, Eijkenboom W, Sillevis-Smitt PAE, van den Bent MJ (2004) Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression. Neurology 63(535):537

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gonzalez J, Kumar AJ, Conrad CA, Levin VA (2006) Effect of bevacizumab on radiation necrosis of the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:323–326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen RL, Ragel BT, Whang K, Gillespie D (2006) Inhibition of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) decreases vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion and tumor growth in malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 78(3):233–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Korkolopoulou P, Patsouris E, Konstantinidou AE et al (2004) Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha/vascular endothelial growth factor axis in astrocytomas. Associations with microvessel morphometry, proliferation and prognosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 30(3):267–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlson MRJ, Pope WB, Horvath S et al (2007) Relationship between survival and edema in malignant gliomas: role of vascular endothelial growth factor and neuronal pentraxin 2. Clin Cancer Res 13(9):2592–2598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Whitney B. Pope.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ananthnarayan, S., Bahng, J., Roring, J. et al. Time course of imaging changes of GBM during extended bevacizumab treatment. J Neurooncol 88, 339–347 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9573-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9573-x

Keywords

Navigation