Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Post-fire salvage logging increases restoration costs in a Mediterranean mountain ecosystem

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Post-fire salvage logging (i.e. felling and removing burnt trees, often eliminating the remaining woody debris) is a practice routinely performed by forest managers worldwide. In Mediterranean-type ecosystems, salvage logging is considered a measure to reduce future reforestation costs, but this assumption remains largely untested. We made a cost analysis of different management schemes, addressing the immediate post-fire burnt-wood management as well as the costs and success of subsequent reforestation efforts. Two experimental 25-ha plots were established in a burnt pine reforestation of SE Spain, in which three replicates of three post-fire treatments were applied: non-intervention (NI), partial cut plus lopping (PCL; felling and lopping off the branches from most of the trees, leaving all biomass in situ), and salvage logging (SL). After 4 years, a mechanised reforestation was undertaken, and seedling mortality was monitored for 2 years. The cost of all management operations was recorded in situ, and the cost of re-planting the dead seedlings was estimated according to the expenses of previous reforestation. Initial cost of wood management was greatest in SL and zero in NI. Reforestation cost was highest in NI and lowest in SL, and seedling-mortality rates proved lowest in PCL (43 % vs. 51 % and 52 % in SL and NI, respectively). Considering all the post-fire management operations, salvage logging did not provide particular economic advantages for forest restoration, and had an overall cost of 3,436 ± 340 €/ha. By contrast, NI and PCL reduced total restoration costs by 50 and 35 %, respectively, and PCL indeed promoted restoration success. We suggest that the full cost of management operations needs to be considered when evaluating the economic implications of post-fire salvage logging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahtikoski A, Alenius V, Mäkitali K (2009) Scots pine stand establishment with special emphasis on uncertainty and cost-effectiveness, the case of northern Finland. New For 40:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbati A, Arianoutsou M, Corona P, De Las Heras J, Fernandes P, Moreira F, Papageorgiou K, Vallejo R, Xanthopoulos G (2010) Post-fire forest management in southern Europe: a COST action for gathering and disseminating scientific knowledge. iForest 3:5–7

  • Bautista S, Gimeno T, Mayor AG, Gallego D (2004) Los tratamientos de la madera quemada tras los incendios forestales. In: Vallejo VR, Alloza JA (eds) La gestión del bosque mediterráneo. Fundación Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo, Valencia, pp 547–570

  • Bowman DMJS, Balch JK, Artaxo P et al (2009) Fire in the earth system. Science 324:481–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bros V, Moreno-Rueda G, Santos X (2011) Does postfire management affect the recovery of Mediterranean communities? The case study of terrestrial gastropods. For Ecol Manage 261:611–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JK, Reinhardt ED, Kramer KA (2003) Coarse woody debris: managing benefits and fire hazard in the recovering forest. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-105. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT

  • Castro J, Navarro R, Guzmán JR, Zamora R, Bautista S (2009) ¿Es conveniente retirar la madera quemada tras un incendio forestal? Quercus 281:34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro J, Marañón-Jiménez S, Sánchez-Miranda A, Lorite J (2010a) Efecto del manejo de la madera quemada sobre la regeneración forestal post-incendio: desarrollo de técnicas blandas de restauración ecológica. In: Ramírez L, Asensio B (eds) Proyectos de investigación en parques nacionales: 2006-2009. Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, Spain, pp 139–157

  • Castro J, Moreno-Rueda G, Hódar JA (2010b) Experimental test of postfire management in pine forests: impact of salvage logging versus partial cutting and nonintervention on bird-species assemblages. Conserv Biol 24:810–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castro J, Allen CD, Molina-Morales M, Marañón-Jiménez S, Sánchez-Miranda A, Zamora R (2011) Salvage logging versus the use of burnt wood as a nurse object to promote post-fire tree seedling establishment. Restor Ecol 19:537–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catry FX, Moreira F, Cardillo E, Pausas JG (2012) Post-fire management of cork oak forests. In: Moreira F, Arianoustou M, Corona P, De las Heras J (eds) Post-fire management and restoration of southern European forests. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–222

  • Costanza R, dArge R, deGroot R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, England

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DellaSala DA, Karr JR, Schoennagel T, Perry D, Noss RF, Lindenmayer D, Beschta R, Hutto RL, Swanson ME, Evans J (2006) Post-fire logging debate ignores many issues. Science 314:51–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denham AJ (2008) Seed predation limits post-fire recruitment in the waratah (Telopea speciosissima). Plant Ecol 199:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donato D, Fontaine J, Campbell J et al (2006) Post-wildfire logging hinders regeneration and increases fire risk. Science 311:352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2007) State of the world’s forest 2007. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

  • Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA (2002) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:375–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haim A, Izhaki I (1994) Changes in rodent community during recovery from fire—relevance to conservation. Biodivers Conserv 3:573–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal G (2000) Valuing ecosystem services. Ecosystems 3:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebblewhite M, Munro RH, Merrill EH (2009) Trophic consequences of postfire logging in a wolf-ungulate system. For Ecol Manage 257:1053–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hougner C, Colding J, Soderqvist T (2006) Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park, Sweden. Ecol Econ 59:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar M, Wittenberg L, Tamir M (1997) Soil erosion and forestry management after wildfire in a Mediterranean woodland, Mt. Carmel, Israel. Int J Wildland Fire 7:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins MJ, Hebertson E, Page W, Jorgensen CA (2008) Bark beetles, fuels, fires and implications for forest management in the intermountain west. For Ecol Manage 254:16–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr J, Rhodes J, Minshall G, Hauer F, Beschta R, Frissell C, Perry D (2004) The effects of postfire salvage logging on aquatic ecosystems in the American west. Bioscience 54:1029–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Noss RF (2006) Salvage logging, ecosystem processes, and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 20:949–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Burton PJ, Franklin JF (2008) Salvage logging and its ecological consequences. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallik AU, Bloom RG, Whisenant SG (2010) Seedbed filter controls post-fire succession. Basic Appl Ecol 11:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marañón-Jiménez S (2011) Efecto del manejo de la madera quemada después de un incendio sobre el ciclo del carbono y nutrientes en un ecosistema de montaña mediterránea. Doctoral Thesis

  • Mavsar R, Varela E, Corona P, Barbati A, Marsh G (2012) Economic, legal and social aspects of post-fire management. In: Moreira F, Arianoustou M, Corona P, De las Heras J (eds) Post-fire management and restoration of southern European forests. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 45–78

  • McIver JD, Starr L (2000) Environmental effects of post-fire logging: literature review and annotated bibliography. USDA Technical Report PNW-GTR-486

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira F, Arianoustou M, Vallejo VR, De las Heras J, Corona P, Xanthopoulos G, Fernandes P, Papageorgiou K (2012) Setting the scene for post-fire management. In: Moreira F, Arianoustou M, Corona P, De las Heras J (eds) Post-fire management and restoration of southern European forests. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–20

  • Noss RF, Lindenmayer DB (2006) The ecological effects of salvage logging after natural disturbance—introduction. Conserv Biol 20:946–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordóñez J, Retana J (2004) Early reduction of post-fire recruitment of Pinus nigra by post-dispersal seed predation in different time-since-fire habitats. Ecography 27:449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puerta-Piñero C, Sánchez-Miranda A, Leverkus A, Castro J (2010) Management of burnt wood after fire affects post-dispersal acorn predation. For Ecol Manage 260:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Ripple WJ, Larsen EJ (2001) The role of post-fire coarse woody debris in aspen regeneration. West J Appl For 16:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross D (1997) Bark beetle response to wildfire. Nat Resour News 7:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost J, Pons P, Bas JM (2009) Can salvage logging affect seed dispersal by birds into burned forests? Acta Oecol Int J Ecol 35:763–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost J, Clavero M, Bas JM, Pons P (2010) Building wood debris piles benefits avian seed dispersers in burned and logged Mediterranean pine forests. For Ecol Manage 260:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savill P, Evans J, Auclair D, Falck J (1997) Plantation silviculture in Europe. Oxford University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Ortiz P, Marañón-Jiménez S, Reverter BR, Sánchez-Cañete EP, Castro J, Zamora R, Kowalski AS (2011) Post-fire salvage logging reduces carbon sequestration in Mediterranean coniferous forest. For Ecol Manage 262:2287–2296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tercero-Bucardo N, Kitzberger T, Veblen TT, Raffaele E (2007) A field experiment on climatic and herbivore impacts on post-fire tree regeneration in north-western Patagonia. J Ecol 95:771–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JR, Spies TA, Ganio LM (2007) Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire. PNAS 104:10743–10748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, Mosseler A (2009) Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change: a synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal

  • Toivanen T, Liikanen V, Kotiaho JS (2009) Effects of forest restoration treatments on the abundance of bark beetles in Norway spruce forests of southern Finland. For Ecol Manage 257:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (2010) Guidance manual for the valuation of regulating services

  • Vallejo JR, Arianoutsou M, Moreira F (2012) Fire ecology and post-fire restoration approaches in Southern European forest types. In: Moreira F, Arianoustou M, Corona P, De las Heras J (eds) Post-fire management and restoration of southern European forests. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 93–119

  • Van Nieuwstadt M, Sheil D, Kartawinata K (2001) The ecological consequences of logging in the burned forests of East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Conserv Biol 15:1183–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco FO, Hernández Y (2012) Transporte de madera por carretera en España: situación actual y conclusiones. Revista Montes 108:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar J (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JW, Webster J, Powers RF, Mills J (2008) Reforestation after the fountain fire in Northern California: an untold success story. J For 106:425–430

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, and the Direction of the Natural and National Park of Sierra Nevada for fieldwork permission, treatment implementation, and facilities. We thank Francisco Vílchez Álvarez and Ernesto Punzano Nieto (Andalusian Water and Environment Agency) for cost data provision. Ángela Sánchez Miranda and Carlos Serrano Hermo provided invaluable fieldwork. This study was supported by Project CGL2008-01671 from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Project 10/2005 from the Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales. CP-P had a postdoctoral fellowship (EX2009-0703) and AL had a Ph. D. grant from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (Ref: AP2010-0272).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandro B. Leverkus.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Costs per hectare of the different management operations in the experimental replicates

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leverkus, A.B., Puerta-Piñero, C., Guzmán-Álvarez, J.R. et al. Post-fire salvage logging increases restoration costs in a Mediterranean mountain ecosystem. New Forests 43, 601–613 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9327-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9327-7

Keywords

Navigation