Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of land prices, transportation costs, and site productivity on timber investment returns for pine plantations in Colombia

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative importance of land costs, site quality, and forest location are major concerns in forestry investments, but little research has been done to assess the impacts of these or other factors on financial returns. In response to this issue, the effects of land prices, wood transportation costs, site productivity, and discount rates on timber investment returns for pine plantations in the Andean Region in Colombia were estimated. For all the scenarios analyzed, the internal rate of return varied between 6.4 and 15.6%. High site quality with high growth rates were profitable in all scenarios at real discount rates ranging from 8 to 12%, but low site qualities seldom had positive net present values. Less expensive land and locations close to mills had better rates of return. More distant locations, poor quality sites, or areas with high land costs generally did not meet the discount hurdle rates. Site quality, which is the factor most easily manipulated by intensive forest management and improved technology, was substantially more important than land prices and transportation differences in determining timber investment returns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banco de la Republica—Colombia (2008) Spot exchange rate. Monthly average data series, information available from 1950. http://www.banrep.gov.co/statistics/sta_exchange_d.htm

  • Carlisle A, Teich AH (1978) Analysing benefits and costs of tree-breeding programmes. Unasylva 30(119–120):34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter R (2007) Positive dynamics for U.S. timberland investing. Presented at 2nd IQPC timberland investment summit. New York, NY, October

  • Cubbage F, Mac Donagh P, Sawinski J, Rubilar R, Donoso P, Ferreira A, Hoeflich V, Morales V, Ferreira G, Balmelli G, Siry J, Baez M, Alvarez J (2007) Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States. New For 33(3):237–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Daigneault A, Sohngen B, Sedjo R (2008) Exchange rates and the competitiveness of the United States timber sector in a global economy. For Pol Econ 10(3):108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak W, Hodge GR, Gutierrez EA, Osorio LF, Malan FS, Stanger T (2000a) Pinus maximinoi. In: Conservation and testing of tropical & subtropical forest tree species by the Camcore Cooperative, Raleigh, North Carolina

  • Dvorak W, Hodge GR, Gutierrez EA, Osorio LF, Malan FS, Stanger T (2000b) Pinus tecunumanii. In: Conservation and testing of tropical & subtropical forest tree species by the Camcore Cooperative, Raleigh, North Carolina

  • FAO (2002) MELINA (Gmelina arborea) IN CENTRAL AMERICA. Forest plantations working papers. Working paper FP/20. Forestry Department, FAO, Rome (Italy)

  • FAO and CONIF (2006) El Manejo Sostenible de los Recursos Forestales. Políticas, Estrategias, Instituciones y Acciones Prioritarias Análisis de País Colombia, Bogotá, p 81

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgach J (2008) “…Why Latin America?” Presented at the timberland investing Latin America summit. IQPC. São Paulo, Brazil, March

  • Gonzalez RW, Saloni D, Dasmohapatra S, Cubbage F (2008) South America: industrial roundwood supply potential. BioResources 3(1):255–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal J (2008) How to maximize gains and diversify risk in forest investments in Brazil. Presented at the timberland investing Latin America summit. IQPC. São Paulo, Brazil, March

  • Li B, McKeand S, Weir R (1999) Tree improvement and sustainable forestry—impact of two cycles of loblolly pine breeding in the U.S.A. For Genet 6:229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendell BC, De La Torre R, Sydor T (2006) Timberland investments in South America: a profile of Colombia. Timber Mart-South Market News Quarterly, 3rd Quarter 2006

  • Porterfield RL (1979) Southern tree improvement impact on forest products—thoughts on the future. In: Fifteenth southern forest tree improvement conference, Starkville, MS

  • SAS Institute Inc (2008) SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 8, 4th edn. Cary, N.C [computer manual]

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo RA (1999) The potential of high-yield forestry for meeting timber needs. New For 17:339–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo RA (2001) The role of forest plantations in the world’s future timber supply. For Chron 77(2):221–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Stape J (2008) Prospecção de Locais para Plantações Florstais no Brasil: uma Perspectiva Ecofisiológica. Presented at the timberland investing Latin America summit. IQPC. São Paulo, Brazil, March

  • Talbert JT, Weir RJ, Arnold RD (1985) Costs and benefits of a mature first-generation loblolly pine tree improvement program. J For 83(3):162–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomberlin D, Buongiorno J (2001) Timber plantations, timber supply, and forest conservation. In: Palo M, Uusivuori J, Mery G (eds) World forests, markets, and polices. World forests volume III. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 85–94

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Lopez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopez, J., De La Torre, R. & Cubbage, F. Effect of land prices, transportation costs, and site productivity on timber investment returns for pine plantations in Colombia. New Forests 39, 313–328 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9173-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9173-4

Keywords

Navigation