Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Individual Features on the Ability of Humans to Produce Voluntary Control of the Expression of the Alpha and Beta EEG Rhythms

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Studies on 17 volunteers addressed the ability to carry out voluntary control of the expression of the α and β2 frequency bands in the parietal and frontal areas of the cortex using a biofeedback method. The effects of a number of psychological properties on the effectiveness control were studied. The study results showed that in these experiments, decreases in the expression of β2 frequencies in the frontal areas of the cortex were more easily produced than decreases in the power of the α frequencies in the parietal areas. The effectiveness of the voluntary control of brain activity was affected by personality factors such as extraversion, psychoticism, neuroticism, mobility, the balance of nervous processes, and the level of trait anxiety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. V. Aslanyan, V. N. Kiroi, D. M. Lazurenko, and O. M. Bakhtin, “The properties of nerve processes and the effectiveness of BioFB training,” Psikhol. Zh., 34, No. 2, 108–116 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. T. Bondar’ and A. I. Fedotchev, “More on the fi ne structure of the human EEG α rhythm: two spectral components in the resting state,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 27, No. 4, 15 (2001).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A. S. Gorev and E. N. Panova, “The effectiveness of BioFB training in controlling functional status depending on individual psychological characteristics,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 35, No. 5, 25–31 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. V. N. Kiroi, Brain-Computer Interfaces, Rostov-on-Don (2011).

  5. A. R. Luriya, Basic Neuropsychology, Moscow (2004).

  6. E. S. Mikhailov, “Neurobiological bases of the recognition of emotions from facial expressions by humans,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 55, No. 2, 149–162 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. S. Nikishena, V. A. Ponomarev, V. A. Grin’-Yatsenko, and Yu. Kropotov, “Topography of changes in the spectral density of the EEG during sessions of biological feedback using the β rhythm,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 30, No. 4, 19–24 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. L. P. Pavlova and A. F. Romanenko, A Systems Approach to Psychophysiological Studies of the Human Brain, Nauka, Leningrad (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. I. Soroko and V. V. Trubachev, Neurophysiological and Psychophy siological Bases of Adaptive Biocontrol, Politekhnika Servis, St. Pe tersburg (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. I. Fedotova and E. V. Kim, “Correction of psychoemotional disorders in pregnancy by biocontrol with EEG feedback,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 32, No. 6, 28–32 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Bar, E. Aminoff, and A. Ishai, “Famous faces activate contextual associations in the parahippocampal cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1233–1238 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Boynton, “Applied research using alpha/theta training for enhancing creativity and well-being,” J. Neurother., 5, No. 1–2, 5–18 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. H. M. Breteler, M. Arns, S. Peters, et al., “Improvements in spelling after QEEG-based neurofeedback in dyslexia: A randomized controlled treatment study,” Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 35, No. 1, 5–11 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. T. J. Buschman and E. K. Miller, “Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices,” Science, 315, 1860–1862 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. C. S. Carter, M. Mintun, and J. D. Cohen, “Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: an H2 15O PET study of Stroop task performance,” Neuroimage, No. 2, 264–272 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J. A. Frederick, “Psychophysics of EEG alpha state discrimination,” Conscious Cogn., 21, No. 3, 1345–1354 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Gevensleben, B. Holl, B. Albrecht, et al., “Distinct EEG effects related to neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: a randomized controlled trial,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 74, No. 2, 149–157 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. M. A. Goodale, D. A. Westwood, and A. D. Milner, “Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action,” Progr. Brain Res., 144, 131–144 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. H. Gruzelier, “Differential effects on mood of 12–15 (SMR) and 15–18 (beta 1) Hz neurofeedback,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 93, No. 1, 112–115 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Kamiya, “The fi rst communications about operant conditioning of the EEG,” J. Neurother., 15, No. 1, 65–73 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. W. Keizer, R. S. Verment, and B. Hommel, “Enhancing cognitive control through neurofeedback: a role of gamma-band activity in managing episodic retrieval,” Neuroimage, 49, 3404–3413 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Lagopoulos, J. Xu, I. Rasmussen, et al., “Increased theta and alpha EEG activity during nondirective meditation,” J. Altern. Complement Med., 15, 1187–1192 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. M. C. Maldonado, “Neurofeedback around the world,” J. Neurother., 10, No. 4, 63 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Neuper, R. Scherer, S. Wriessnegger, and G. Pfurtscheller, “Motor imagery and action observation: Modulation of sensorimotor brain rhythms during mental control of a brain-computer interface,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 120, No. 2, 239–247 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Perelmouter and N. Birbaumer, “A binary spelling interface with random errors,” IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., 8, 227–232 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Reiner, R. Rozengurt, and A. Barnea, “Better than sleep: Theta neurofeedback training accelerates memory consolidation,” Biol. Psychol., 95, 45–53 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. H. E. Schendan and M. Kutas, “Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 19, No. 5, 734–749 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. J. G. Taylor, B. Horwitz, N. J. Shah, et al., “Decomposing memory: functional assignments and brain traffi c in paired word associate learning,” Neural Netw., 13, No. 8–9, 923–940 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. G. J. M. Van Boxtel, A. Denissen, M. Jager, et al., “A novel self-guided approach to alpha activity training,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 83, No. 3, 282–294 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Vernon, F. Ahmed, and J. Gruzelier, “The effect of low-beta EEG biofeedback training on cognitive performance: A null result,” Paper presented at the International Society for Neuronal Regulation, Winterthur, Switzerland, Feb. 24–28, 2004.

  31. D. Vernon, T. Egner, N. Cooper, et al., “The effect of distinct neurofeedback training protocols on working memory, mental rotation and attention performance,” J. Neurother., 8, No. 1, 100–101 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Vernon, A. Frick, and J. Gruzelier, “Neurofeedback as a treatment for ADHD: A methodological review with implications for future research,” J. Neurother., 8, No. 2, 53–82 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. E. Walker, “Case report: Dyslexia remediated with QEEG-guided neurofeedback,” Neuro-Connections, 28 (2010).

  34. J.-R. Wang and Sh. Hsieh, “Neurofeedback training improves attention and working memory performance,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 124, No. 12, 2406–2420 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Aslanyan.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 101, No. 5, pp. 599–613, May, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aslanyan, E.V., Kiroi, V.N., Stoletnii, A.S. et al. Effects of Individual Features on the Ability of Humans to Produce Voluntary Control of the Expression of the Alpha and Beta EEG Rhythms. Neurosci Behav Physi 46, 916–925 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-016-0332-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-016-0332-8

Keywords

Navigation