A complex study of the characteristics of the mu rhythm with subjects in different states was performed: during observation of movements and during execution of their own movements. Stimuli for movement observation were presented on a monitor screen and consisted of a set of movements for which published data show that mirror neurons mount different responses. In particular, these are movements with or without an expressed goal and various tool manipulations. Studies of the effects of the subjects’ movements on the mu rhythm were performed using situations in which subjects executed their own movements and situations in which they imitated movements seen on a monitor screen. Different methods of processing EEG traces and analyzing evoked desynchronization (suppression) of the mu rhythm were used. These experiments showed that presentation of video recordings of different types of movements induced moderate suppression of the spectral power of the mu rhythm. There were no significant differences in the depression of the mu rhythm on observation of movements performed with or without a clear movement goal or movements for which the goal was reached with a tool. Thus, changes in the mu rhythm and suppression of the mirror neuron system on observation of an executed movement were significantly different. Analysis of the time development of mu rhythm depression showed that changes which were quite clearly apparent at the beginning of observation gradually weakened, generally decreasing to statistically insignificant values at the final stages. The “habituation” effect seen in changes in the mu rhythm indicates a possible role for the mechanisms of involuntary and voluntary attention in mu rhythm depression. The “habituation” effect was also characteristic of more marked changes in the mu rhythm seen on execution of movements by the subjects. Significant differences were seen between depression of the mu rhythm evoked by the subjects’ own movements and on imitation of movements. The habituation effect was more marked in the latter case. These differences in the nature of mu rhythm depression may be associated with differences in activation of those areas of the cortex responsible for movement preparation and programming and with changes associated with the rapid development of motor automation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Bernier, G. Dawson, S. Webb, and M. Murias, “EEG mu rhythm and imitation impairments in individuals with autism spectrum disorder,” Brain Cogn., 64, 228–237 (2007).
G. Buccino, F. Binkofski, G. R. Fink, L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi,V. Gallese, R. J. Seitz, K. Zilles, G. Rizzolatti, and H. J. Freund, “Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 13, 400–404 (2001).
G. Buccino, F. Lui, N. Canessa, I. Patteri, G. Lagravinese, F. Benuzzi, C. A. Porro, and G. Rizzolatti, “Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by non-conspecifics: an fMRI study,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 16, 114–126 (2004).
F. Cassim,W. Szurhaj, H. Sediri, D. Devos, J.-L. Bourriez, I. Poirot, P. Derambure, L. Defebvre, and J.-D. Guieu, “Brief and sustained movements: differences in event-related (de)synchronization (ERD/ERS) patterns,” Clin. Neurophysiology, 111, 2032–2039 (2000).
G. E. Chatrian, M. C. Petersen, and J. A. Lazarte, “The blocking of the rolandic wicket rhythm and some central changes related to movement,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 11, Supplement 497–510 (1959).
S. Cochin, C. Barthelemy, B. Lejeune, S. Rouz, and J. Martineau, “Perception of motion and qEEG activity in human adults,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 107, 287–295 (1998).
S. Cochin, C. Barthelemy, S. Roux, and J. Martineau, “Observation and execution of movement: similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalography,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 11, 1839–1842 (1999).
A. Covello, M. de Barros-Ferreira, and G. C. Lairy, “A telemetric study of central rhythms in children,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 38, 307–319 (1975).
J. Decety, J. Grezes, N. Costes, D. Perani, M. Jeannerod, E. Procyk, F. Grassi, and F. Fazio, “Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subjects strategy,” Brain, 120, 1763–1777 (1997).
G. Di Pelletrino, L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, V. Gallese, and G. Rizzolatti, “Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study,” Exp. Brain Res., 91, 176–180 (1992).
N. Erbil and P. Ungan, “Changes in the alpha and beta amplitudes of the central EEG during the onset, continuation, and offset of longduration repetitive hand movements,” Brain Res., 1169, 44–56 (2007).
V. Gallese, L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, and G. Rizzolatti, “Action recognition in the premotor cortex,” Brain, 119, 593–609 (1996).
H. J. Gastaut and J. Bert, “EEG changes during cinematographic presentation,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 6, 433–444 (1954).
J. Grezes, N. Costes, and J. Decety, “Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a PET investigation,” Cogn. Neuropsychology, 15, 553–582 (1998).
L. Leocani, C. Toro, P. Manganotti, P. Zhuang, and M. Hallett, “Event-related coherence and event-related desynchronization/synchronization in the 10 Hz and 20 Hz EEG during self-paced movements,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 104, 199–206 (1997).
S. D. Muthukumarasmwamy, B. W. Johnson, and N. A. McNair, “Mu rhythm modulation during observation of an object-directed grasp,” Cogn. Brain Res., 19, 195–201 (2004).
S. D. Muthukumarasmwamy and B. W. Johnson, “Changes in rolandic mu rhythm during observation of a precision grip,” Psychophysiology, 41, 152–156 (2004).
L. M. Oberman, E. M. Hubbard, J. P. McCleary, E. L. Altschuler, V. S. Ramachandran, and J. A. Pineda, “EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders,” Cogn. Brain Res., 24, 190–198 (2005).
L. M. Oberman, J. P. McCleery,V. S. Ramachandran, and J. A. Pineda, “EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Towards an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots,” Neurocomputing, 70, 2194–2203 (2007).
D. Perani, F. Fazio, N. A. Borghese, M. Tettamanti, S. Ferrari, J. Decety, and M. C. Gilardi, “Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions,” Neuroimage, 14, 749–758 (2001).
G. Pfurtscheller, C. Neuper, C. Andrew, and G. Edlinger, “Foot and hand area mu rhythms,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 26, 121–135 (1997).
G. Pfurtscheller and C. Neuper, “Functional dissociation of lower and upper frequency mu rhythms in relation to voluntary limb movement,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 111, 1873–1879 (2000).
G. Pfurtscheller, C. Brunner, A. Schlogl, and F. H. Lopes da Silva, “Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks,” NeuroImage, 31, 153–159 (2006).
J. A. Pineda, “The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating ‘seeing’ and ‘hearing’ into ‘doing,’” Brain Res. Rev., 50, 57–68 (2005).
G. Rizzolatti, L. Fadiga, V. Gallese, and L. Fogassi, “Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions,” Cogn. Brain Res., 3, 131–141 (1996).
G. Rizzolatti and L. Craighero, “The mirror-neuron system,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 27, 169–192 (2004).
C. Toro, G. Deuschl, R. Thatcher, S. Sato, C. Kufta, and M. Hallett, “Event-related desynchronization and movement-related cortical potentials on the ECoG and EEG,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 93, 380–389 (1994).
W. van Winsum, J. Sergeant, and R. Geuze, “The functional significance of event-related desynchronization of alpha rhythm in attentional and activating tasks,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 58, 519–524 (1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 96, No. 11, pp. 1088–1096, November, 2010.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aleksandrov, A.A., Tugin, S.M. Changes in the Mu Rhythm in Different Types of Motor Activity and on Observation of Movements. Neurosci Behav Physi 42, 302–307 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-012-9566-2
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-012-9566-2