Abstract
The behavior of gas flow in fractures is crucial for evaluating shale gas production. This study focused on the coupling relationships between effective stress, surface roughness, and gas flow behavior in shale fractures. Three fractured shale specimens were generated using Brazilian splitting tests. The fracture surfaces were then scanned using a 3D profilometer to quantify surface roughness in two and three dimensions. Gas flow tests were conducted on the fractured shale specimens under varying effective stresses (1–15 MPa). The results showed that the Spc (arithmetic mean curvature of crest points) had little effect on nonlinear flow at low effective stress (1–5 MPa) but it became more pronounced at high effective stress (10–15 MPa) due to fracture channel narrowing. Then, the inertial force effect regulated by effective stress and roughness was enhanced as the Reynolds number increased. A friction coefficient model based on the nonlinear effect factor and Reynolds number is proposed and it fits the experimental data well. Furthermore, that effective stress plays a dominant role in permeability loss compared to fracture surface roughness and fluid properties, and exponential function better describes fractured shale permeability under effective stress than power function. Finally, during fracture closure under effective stress, Ra (arithmetic mean roughness) correlated positively with the self-supporting effect of fracture surfaces. As Spc increased, fracture surface peaks became sharper and more easily damaged due to excessive extrusion between contact surfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Yaarubi, A. H., Pain, C. C., Grattoni, C. A., & Zimmerman, R. W. (2004). Navier-Stokes simulations of fluid flow through a rock fracture. Dynamics of Fluids in Fractured Rock, 201.
Bazaz, S. R., Mashhadian, A., Ehsani, A., Saha, S. C., Krüger, T., & Warkiani, M. E. (2020). Computational inertial microfluidics: A review. Lab on a Chip, 20(6), 1023–1048.
Brown, S. R. (1987). Fluid flow through rock joints: The effect of surface roughness. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 92(B2), 1337–1347.
David, C., Wong, T., Zhu, W., & Zhang, J. (1994). Laboratory measurement of compaction-induced permeability change in porous rocks: Implications for the generation and maintenance of pore pressure excess in the crust. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 143, 425–456.
Earl, M., Qi, Z., & Giovanni, G. (2019). 2D and 3D roughness characterization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01977-4
Fakherdavood, M. J. N., Ramezanzadeh, A., & Jenabi, H. (2019). Laboratory investigation of nonlinear flow characteristics through natural rock fractures. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 52(4), 519–528.
Forchheimer, P. H. (1901). Wasserbewegung durch boden. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure, 45(50), 1781–1788.
Francois, B. (2006). 3D parameters and new filtration techniques. Japan Society for Precision Engineering Spring Meeting Symposium Materials, 2006, 21–27.
Ghabezloo, S., Sulem, J., & Saint-Marc, J. (2009). Evaluation of a permeability–porosity relationship in a low-permeability creeping material using a single transient test. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46(4), 761–768.
Gui, Y., Xia, C., Ding, W., Qian, X., & Du, S. (2017). A new method for 3d modeling of joint surface degradation and void space evolution under normal and shear loads. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 50(10), 2827–2836.
Guo, P., Wang, M., He, M., Wang, Y., Gao, K., & Gong, W. (2020). Experimental investigation on macroscopic behavior and microfluidic field of nonlinear flow in rough-walled artificial fracture models. Advances in Water Resources, 142, 103637.
Guo, T. K., Zhang, S. C., Qu, Z. Q., Zhou, T., Xiao, Y. S., & Gao, J. (2014). Experimental study of hydraulic fracturing for shale by stimulated reservoir volume. Fuel, 128, 373–380.
Hou, L., Zhang, S., Elsworth, D., Liu, H., Sun, B., & Geng, X. (2021). Review of fundamental studies of CO2 fracturing: fracture propagation, propping and permeating. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 205, 108823.
Huang, Z., Zhang, S., Yang, R., Wu, X., Li, R., Zhang, H., & Hung, P. (2020). A review of liquid nitrogen fracturing technology. Fuel, 266, 117040.
Javadi, M., Sharifzadeh, M., Shahriar, K., & Mitani, Y. (2014). Critical Reynolds number for nonlinear flow through rough-walled fractures: The role of shear processes. Water Resources Research, 50(2), 1789–1804.
Jiang, J. M., & Younis, R. M. (2015). A multimechanistic multicontinuum model for simulating shale gas reservoir with complex fractured system. Fuel, 161, 333–344.
Jiang, K., Deng, S., Jiang, X., & Li, H. (2023). Calculation of fracture number and length formed by methane deflagration fracturing technology. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 180, 104701.
Jin, J. W., Li, C. L., Guo, H. Z., & Xiao, S. C. (2012). Research and exploration of high energy gas fracturing stimulation integrated technology in chinese shale gas reservoir. Advanced Materials Research, 524, 1532–1536.
Kalam, S., Afagwu, C., Al Jaberi, J., Siddig, O. M., Tariq, Z., Mahmoud, M., & Abdulraheem, A. (2021). A review on non-aqueous fracturing techniques in unconventional reservoirs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 95, 104223.
Konzuk, J. S., & Kueper, B. H. (2004). Evaluation of cubic law based models describing single-phase flow through a rough-walled fracture. Water Resources Research, 40(2).
Li, B., Liu, R., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Influences of hydraulic gradient, surface roughness, intersecting angle, and scale effect on nonlinear flow behavior at single fracture intersections. Journal of Hydrology, 538, 440–453.
Li, B., Wang, J., Liu, R., & Jiang, Y. (2021). Nonlinear fluid flow through three-dimensional rough fracture networks: Insights from 3D-printing, CT-scanning, and high-resolution numerical simulations. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 13(5), 1020–1032.
Li, B., Xu, W., Yan, L., Xu, J., He, M., & Xie, W. C. (2020). Effect of Shearing on non-Darcian fluid flow characteristics through Rough-Walled fracture. Water, 12(11), 3260.
Li, D., Chen, Y., Liu, L., Sun, W., & Wang, C. (2023). Experimental study on enhancing methane explosion characteristics by Al and KMnO4 powders under large pipelines. Fuel, 342, 127810.
Li, H., Lu, Y., Zhou, L., Tang, J., Han, S., & Ao, X. (2018). Experimental and model studies on loading path-dependent and nonlinear gas flow behavior in shale fractures. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 51, 227–242.
Liu, R., Li, B., Jiang, Y., & Yu, L. (2018). A numerical approach for assessing effects of shear on equivalent permeability and nonlinear flow characteristics of 2-D fracture networks. Advances in Water Resources, 111, 289–300.
Liu, R., Yu, L., & Jiang, Y. (2017). Quantitative estimates of normalized transmissivity and the onset of nonlinear fluid flow through rough rock fractures. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 50, 1063–1071.
Manuel, J. P., Ruben, D. C., & Sol, A. M. (2012). High energy gas fracturing: a technique of hydraulic prefracturing to reduce the pressure losses by friction in the near wellbore—a colombian field application. SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference (pp. SPE-152886). https://doi.org/10.2118/152886-ms
Min, K., Rutqvist, J., Tsang, C., & Jing, L. (2004). Stress-dependent permeability of fractured rock masses: A numerical study. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 41(7), 1191–1210.
Morrow, C. A., Shi, L. Q., & Byerlee, J. D. (1984). Permeability of fault gouge under confining pressure and shear stress. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 89(B5), 3193–3200.
Oron, A. P., & Berkowitz, B. (1998). Flow in rock fractures: The local cubic law assumption reexamined. Water Resources Research, 34(11), 2811–2825.
Quinn, P. M., Cherry, J. A., & Parker, B. L. (2020). Relationship between the critical Reynolds number and aperture for flow through single fractures: Evidence from published laboratory studies. Journal of Hydrology, 581, 124384.
Ranjith, P. G., & Darlington, W. (2007). Nonlinear single-phase flow in real rock joints. Water Resources Research, 43(9), 146–156.
Rong, G., Tan, J., Zhan, H., He, R., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Quantitative evaluation of fracture geometry influence on nonlinear flow in a single rock fracture. Journal of Hydrology, 589, 125162.
Rutqvist, J., & Stephansson, O. (2003). The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeology Journal, 11(1), 7–40.
Rutqvist, J., Tsang, C. F., & Tsang, Y. (2004). Analysis of stress and moisture induced changes in fractured rock permeability at the yucca mountain drift scale test. Elsevier Geo-Engineering Book Series, 2, 161–166.
Shen, Z., Zhou, L., Su, X., Li, H., Tang, J., & Zheng, X. (2020). An experimental investigation of the nonlinear gas flow and stress-dependent permeability of shale fractures. Energy Science & Engineering, 8(8), 2808–2822.
Shi, Y., & Wang, C. Y. (1986). Pore pressure generation in sedimentary basins: overloading versus aquathermal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 91(B2), 2153–2162.
Song, X., Guo, Y., Zhang, J., Sun, N., Shen, G., Chang, X., & Wei, W. (2019). Fracturing with carbon dioxide: from microscopic mechanism to reservoir application. Joule, 3(8), 1913–1926.
Stout, K. J. (1993). The development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions. Commission of the european communities. Luxembourg, 130.
Sun, Y., Zhai, C., Xu, J., Cong, Y., Qin, L., & Zhao, C. (2020). Characterisation and evolution of the full size range of pores and fractures in rocks under freeze-thaw conditions using nuclear magnetic resonance and three-dimensional X-ray microscopy. Engineering Geology, 271, 105616.
Sun, Y., Zhai, C., Xu, J., Cong, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Experimental study on pore structure evolution of coal in macroscopic, mesoscopic, and microscopic scales during liquid nitrogen cyclic cold-shock fracturing. Fuel, 291, 120150.
Sun, Y., Zhai, C., Xu, J., Yu, X., Cong, Y., Zheng, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Damage and failure of hot dry rock under cyclic liquid nitrogen cold shock treatment: A non-destructive ultrasonic test method. Natural Resources Research, 31(1), 261–279.
Tan, P., Jin, Y., Han, K., Hou, B., Chen, M., Guo, X., & Gao, J. (2017). Analysis of hydraulic fracture initiation and vertical propagation behavior in laminated shale formation. Fuel, 206, 482–493.
Tan, Y. L., Pan, Z. J., Liu, J. S., Feng, X. T., & Connell, L. D. (2018). Laboratory study of proppant on shale fracture permeability and compressibility. Fuel, 222, 83–97.
Tzelepis, V., Moutsopoulos, K. N., Papaspyros, J. N. E., & Tsihrintzis, V. A. (2015). Experimental investigation of flow behavior in smooth and rough artificial fractures. Journal of Hydrology, 521, 108-118.s
Walsh, J. B. (1981). Effect of pore pressure and confining pressure on fracture permeability. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 18, 429–435.
Wanniarachchi, W., Ranjith, P. G., & Perera, M. (2017). Shale gas fracturing using foam-based fracturing fluid: A review. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(2), 1–15.
Wanniarachchi, W. A. M., Ranjith, P. G., Perera, M. S. A., Rathnaweera, T. D., Zhang, D. C., & Zhang, C. (2018). Investigation of effects of fracturing fluid on hydraulic fracturing and fracture permeability of reservoir rocks: An experimental study using water and foam fracturing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 194, 117–135.
Warpinski, N. R., & Teufel, L. W. (1992). Determination of the effective-stress law for permeability and deformation in low-permeability rocks. Spe Formation Evaluation, 7, 123–131.
Weiyu, Y., Chunhu, Z., Fadong, Q., & Dang, L. (1992). High-energy gas fracturing (HEGF) technology: Research and application. https://doi.org/10.2118/24990-ms
White, F. M. (1990). Fluid mechanics. New York
Witherspoon, P. A., Wang, J. S. Y., Iwai, K., & Gale, J. E. (1980). Validity of Cubic Law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resources Research, 16(6), 1016–1024.
Wu, J., Yin, Q., & Jing, H. (2020). Surface roughness and boundary load effect on nonlinear flow behavior of fluid in real rock fractures. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 79, 4917–4932.
Xiong, F., Jiang, Q., Ye, Z., & Zhang, X. (2018). Nonlinear flow behavior through rough-walled rock fractures: the effect of contact area. Computers and Geotechnics, 102, 179–195.
Yin, P., Zhao, C., Ma, J., Yan, C., & Huang, L. (2020). Experimental study of non-linear fluid flow though rough fracture based on fractal theory and 3D printing technique. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 129, 104293.
Yin, Q., Jing, H., Liu, R., Ma, G., Yu, L., & Su, H. (2018). Experimental study on stress-dependent nonlinear flow behavior and normalized transmissivity of real rock fracture networks. Geofluids, 2018.
Yin, Q., Liu, R., Jing, H., Su, H., Yu, L., & He, L. (2019). Experimental study of nonlinear flow behaviors through fractured rock samples after high-temperature exposure. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 52, 2963–2983.
Zhang, Q., Luo, S., Ma, H., Wang, X., & Qian, J. (2019). Simulation on the water flow affected by the shape and density of roughness elements in a single rough fracture. Journal of Hydrology, 573, 456–468.
Zhang, X., Chen, H., Yao, C., Yang, J., Jiang, S., Jiang, Q., & Zhou, C. (2020). Seepage characteristics of triaxial compression-induced fractured rocks under varying confining pressures. International Journal of Geomechanics, 20(9), 04020160.
Zhang, Y., & Chai, J. (2020). Effect of surface morphology on fluid flow in rough fractures: a review. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 79, 103343.
Zhao, S. H., Li, Y., Wang, Y. B., Ma, Z. T., & Huang, X. Q. (2019). Quantitative study on coal and shale pore structure and surface roughness based on atomic force microscopy and image processing. Fuel, 244, 78–90.
Zhou, J. Q., Hu, S. H., Fang, S., Chen, Y. F., & Zhou, C. B. (2015). Nonlinear flow behavior at low Reynolds numbers through rough-walled fractures subjected to normal compressive loading. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 80, 202–218.
Zhou, J., Wang, L., Li, C., Tang, H., & Wang, L. (2020). Effect of fluid slippage on eddy growth and non-Darcian flow in rock fractures. Journal of Hydrology, 581, 124440.
Zimmerman, R. W., Al-Yaarubi, A., Pain, C. C., & Grattoni, C. A. (2004). Non-linear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 41, 163–169.
Zimmerman, R. W., Chen, D. W., & Cook, N. G. W. (1992). The effect of contact area on the permeability of fractures. Journal of Hydrology, 139(1–4), 79–96.
Zimmerman, R. W., & Yeo, I. W. (2000). Fluid flow in rock fractures: From the Navier–Stokes equations to the cubic law. Geophysical Monograph-American Geophysical Union, 122, 213–224.
Zou, L., Jing, L., & Cvetkovic, V. (2017). Shear-enhanced nonlinear flow in rough-walled rock fractures. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 97, 33–45.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFA0711800), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51774278), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51925404).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, T., Zhai, C., Liu, T. et al. Impact of Effective Stress and Surface Roughness on Nonlinear Gas Flow in Shale Fractures. Nat Resour Res 32, 2637–2654 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-023-10243-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-023-10243-y