Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Water Footprints of Cassava- and Molasses-Based Ethanol Production in Thailand

  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Thai government has been promoting renewable energy as well as stimulating the consumption of its products. Replacing transport fuels with bioethanol will require substantial amounts of water and enhance water competition locally. This study shows that the water footprint (WF) of molasses-based ethanol is less than that of cassava-based ethanol. The WF of molasses-based ethanol is estimated to be in the range of 1,510–1,990 L water/L ethanol, while that of cassava-based ethanol is estimated at 2,300–2,820 L water/L ethanol. Approximately 99% of the water in each of these WFs is used to cultivate crops. Ethanol production requires not only substantial amounts of water but also government interventions because it is not cost competitive. In Thailand, the government has exploited several strategies to lower ethanol prices such as oil tax exemptions for consumers, cost compensation for ethanol producers, and crop price assurances for farmers. For the renewable energy policy to succeed in the long run, the government may want to consider promoting molasses-based ethanol production as well as irrigation system improvements and sugarcane yield-enhancing practices, since molasses-based ethanol is more favorable than cassava-based ethanol in terms of its water consumption, chemical fertilizer use, and production costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agricultural Information Center. (2008). Agricultural economics. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

  • Agricultural Information Center. (2010). Agricultural economics. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

  • Centre for Agricultural Information. (2011). Thailand foreign agricultural trade statistics. Bangkok: Office of Agricultural Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Y. W., Walseth, B., & Suh, S. (2009). Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 2688–2692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Y. W., & Wu, M. (2012). Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways. Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 9155–9162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Fraiture, C., Giordano, M., & Liao, Y. (2008). Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: Blue impacts of green energy. Water Policy, 10, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture. (2012a). Cassava plantation manual. Available from http://it.doa.go.th/pibai/pibai/n11/v_11-mar/jakfam2.html. Accessed September, 2012.

  • Department of Agriculture. (2012b). Sugar cane plantation manual. Available from it.doa.go.th/vichakan/news.php?newsid=13. Accessed September, 2012.

  • Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency. (2008). Energy policy. Bangkok: Ministry of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency. (2012). The renewable and alternative energy development plan for 25 percent in 10 years (AEDP 2012–2021). Bangkok: Department of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditomaso, M. J., et al. (2010). Biofuel vs bioinvasion: Seeding policy priorities. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 6906–6910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOE. (2009). Estimating freshwater needs to meet future thermoelectric generation requirements: Update 2009. Washington, DC: National Energy Technology Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez-Faus, R., Powers, E. S., Burken, G. J., & Alvarez, J. P. (2009). The water footprint of biofuels: A drink or drive issue? Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 3005–3010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhaupt, E. (2007). Biofueling water problem. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 7593–7595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2010a). Bioenergy and food security: The BEFS analysis for Thailand. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2010b). FAOSTAT. Available from http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567. Accessed September, 2012.

  • FAO. (2011). Thailand and FAO achievements and success stories. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2013). CROPWAT 8.0. Available from http://www.fao.org/nr/water/infores_databases_cropwat.html. Accessed September, 2013.

  • Gerbens-Leenes, W., & Hoekstra, Y. A. (2011). The water footprint of biofuel-based transport. Energy and Environmental Science, 4, 2658–2668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, H. P. (1994). Water and energy. Annual Review Energy, 19, 267–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Y. A., Chapagain, K. A., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2009). Water footprint manual: State of the art 2009. Enschede: Water Footprint Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irrigation Water Management Research Group. Crop coefficient (K c ) 40 crop types. Bangkok: Office of Hydrology and Water Management Royal Irrigation Department.

  • King, C. W., & Webber, M. E. (2008). Water intensity of transportation. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 7866–7872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapola, D. M., et al. (2010). Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 3388–3393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienden van, A., Gerbens-Leenes, R., Hoekstra, A. Y., & van der Meer, T. H. (2010). Biofuel scenarios in a water perspective: The global blue and green water footprint of road transport in 2030. Delft: UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Energy. (2011). Energy situation in thailand. Bangkok: Ministry of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Energy. (2012). National energy policy council resolution. Available from http://www.eppo.go.th/nepc/kbg/kbg-104.htm. Accessed September, 2012.

  • Mishra, G. S., & Teh, S. (2011). Life cycle water consumption and withdrawal requirements of ethanol from corn grain and residues. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 4563–4569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, A. K., Griffin, M. W., & Matthews, S. H. (2011). Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2008). Water implications of biofuels production in the United States (pp. 19–25). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Technology and Innovation Policy Office. (2012). Thailand technology needs assessments report for climate change-adaptation. Bangkok: National Science Technology and Innovation Policy Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Agricultural Economics. (2010). Agricultural economics database. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Cane and Sugar Board Economic. (2012). Value of the cane and sugar industry in Thailand. Available from http://www.ocsb.go.th/th/faq/index.php?gpid=18. Accessed June, 2012.

  • Pimentel, D. (2003). Ethanol fuels: Energy balance, economics, and environmental impacts are negative. Natural Resources Research, 12, 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., & Patzek, T. W. (2005). Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood; Biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Natural Resources Research, 14, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plevin, R. J., et al. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels’ indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 8015–8021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongpinyopap, S., & Mungcharoen, T. (2011). The water footprint of cassava based ethanol in Thailand. Kasetsart Engineering Journal, 75, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, E. C., et al. (2012). Biofuels: Network analysis of the literature reveals key environmental and economic unknowns. Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 1309–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt, G. B., & Pfister, S. (2010). Reducing humanity’s water footprint. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 6019–6021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Irrigation Department. (2010). Crop coefficient. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

  • Royal Irrigation Department. (2011a). Reference evapotranspiration by Penman–Monteith from 1981–2011. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Irrigation Department. (2011b). Crop coefficient. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

  • Sampattagul, S., & Kongboon, R. (2012). The water footprint of sugarcane and cassava in northern Thailand. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 451–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, R., & Blasch, J. (2010). Sustainability standards for bioenergy—A means to reduce climate change risks? Energy Policy. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.011.

  • Scown, C. D., Horvath, A., & McKone, T. E. (2011). Water footprint of U.S. transportation fuels. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 2541–2553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searchinger, T., et al. (2008). Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319, 1238–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethaputra, S., Thanopanuwat, S., Kumpa, L., & Pattanee, S. (2001). Thailand’s water vision: A case study. Bangkok: The FAO-ESCAP Pilot Project on National Water Visions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sora, G., Banse, M., & Kemfert, C. (2010). An overview of biofuel policies across the world. Energy Policy, 38, 6977–6988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thailand Environment Institute Foundation. (2007). Life cycle assessment of cassava and molasses-based ethanol. Bangkok: Ministry of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO-IHE. (2008). The water footprint of bio-energy: Global water use for bio-ethanol, bio-diesel, heat and electricity. The value of water research report series. Delft: Institute for Water Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallington, T. J., et al. (2012). Corn ethanol production, food exports, and indirect land use change. Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 6379–6384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. D. P., Inman, D., Aden, A., & Heath, A. G. (2009). Environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels in the U.S.: What do we really know? Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 4763–4775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., Mintz, M., Wang, M., & Arora, S. (2009). Water consumption in the production of ethanol and petroleum gasoline. Environmental Management, 44, 981–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by The Thailand Research Fund (Grant Number MRG5480207).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International College (Major in Public Policy and Management), National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand

    Aweewan Mangmeechai

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Prasert Pavasant

Authors
  1. Aweewan Mangmeechai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prasert Pavasant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aweewan Mangmeechai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mangmeechai, A., Pavasant, P. Water Footprints of Cassava- and Molasses-Based Ethanol Production in Thailand. Nat Resour Res 22, 273–282 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-013-9214-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-013-9214-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation