Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geologic and Economic Criteria for Siting Clean-Coal Facilities in the Texas Gulf Coast, USA

  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Texas Gulf Coast (TGC) contains the greatest number of favorably co-located CO2 sources and sinks in Texas that favor new potential clean-coal facilities. Areas in the TGC with clean-coal potential were delineated by mapping spatial linkages between coal- and lignite-bearing formations and geologic and infrastructure factors that include proximity to existing fields from mine-mouth power plants for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), length of new pipelines to transport CO2 from new clean-coal facilities to either EOR fields or to brine formations for deep storage, proximity to centers of electric load, and depth to subsurface coal for enhanced coalbed methane recovery. Other factors include thickness of brine formations for deep storage of CO2, groundwater and surface-water availability, and proximity to railroads for haulage of western U.S. coal feedstock. Geospatial analysis of maps portraying the distribution of these factors, together with data on volumes of oil recoverable from miscible CO2 flooding of oil fields, indicates that optimal areas for new clean-coal sites in the TGC are in east and southeast Texas. CO2 pipeline networks linking these sites to EOR fields are integral components of systems that can typically recover 5–50 million stock tank barrels from miscible CO2 flooding from each EOR field. Many of these fields with EOR potential (for example, Neches, Long Lake, Conroe, and Livingston) have a great potential for stacked CO2 storage, in which multiple reservoir zones can undergo EOR development and deeper zones in the field can accommodate excess CO2 from EOR operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advanced Resources International. (2006a). Basin oriented strategies for CO2 enhanced oil recovery: East and central Texas. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy–Office of Oil and Natural Gas. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/eor_co2/East_&_Central_Texas_Document.pdf.

  • Advanced Resources International. (2006b). Basin oriented strategies for CO2 enhanced oil recovery: Permian Basin: Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy–Office of Oil and Natural Gas. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.adv-res.com/pdf/Basin%20Oriented%20Strategies%20-%20Permian_Basin.pdf.

  • Al-Juaied, M., & Whitmore, A. (2009). Realistic costs of carbon capture. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Energy Technology Innovation Research Group, Harvard Kennedy School, Discussion Paper 2009-08, 57 pp.

  • Ambrose, W. A., Breton, C., Holtz, M. H., Núñez-López, V., Hovorka, S. D., & Duncan, I. J. (2009a). CO2 source-sink matching in the lower 48 United States, with examples from the Texas Gulf Coast and Permian Basin. Environmental Geology, 57, 1537–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, W. A., Breton, C., Hovorka, S. D., Duncan, I. J., Gülen, G., Holtz, M. H., et al. (2011). Geologic and infrastructure factors for delineating areas for clean coal: Examples in Texas, USA. Environmental Earth Science, 63, 513–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, W. A., Hentz, T. F., Bonnaffé, F., Loucks, R. G., Brown, L. F, Jr., & Wang, F. P. (2009b). Sequence stratigraphic controls on complex reservoir architecture of highstand fluvial-dominated deltaic and lowstand valley-fill deposits in the Woodbine Group, East Texas field: Regional and local perspectives. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 93(2), 231–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, W. A., Lakshminarasimhan, S., Holtz, M. H., Núñez López, V., Hovorka, S. D., & Duncan, I. J. (2008). Geologic factors controlling CO2 storage capacity and permanence: Case studies based on experience with heterogeneity in oil and gas reservoirs applied to CO2 storage. Environmental Geology, 54, 1619–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Railroads. (2006). Railroad service in Texas. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.aar.org/PubCommon/Documents/AboutTheIndustry/RRState_TX.pdf?states=RRState_TX.pdf.

  • Ayers, W. B., Jr., & Lewis, A. H. (1985). The Wilcox Group and Carrizo sand (Paleogene) in east-central Texas: Depositional systems and deep-basin lignite. Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Special Publication, 19 pp. and 30 plates.

  • Ayers, W. B, Jr., Lewis, A. H., & Collins, G. F. (1986). Resistivity, lignite and lithofacies mapping of the Wilcox Group, east-central Texas. In W. R. Kaiser (Ed.), Geology and groundwater hydrology of deep-basin lignite in the Wilcox Group of East Texas (pp. 31–50). Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Special Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, W. B., Jr., McVay, D. A., Barrufet, M. A., Hernandez, G., Bello, R., & He, T. (2011). Potential for enhanced methane production from coal, with concomitant CO2 sequestration—examples from a high-rank coal (Pottsville Formation, Black Warrior Basin) and a low-rank coal (Wilcox Group, Texas Gulf Coast Basin). American Association of Petroleum Geologists Search and Discovery Article #80159. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2011/80159ayers/ndx_ayers.pdf.

  • Bebout, D. G., Weise, B. R., Gregory, A. R., & Edwards, M. B. (1982). Wilcox sandstone reservoirs in the deep subsurface along the Texas Gulf Coast: Their potential for production of geopressured geothermal energy (Vol. 117, 125 pp). Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations.

  • Bustin, R. M., Cui, X., & Chikatamarla, L. (2008). Impacts of volumetric strain on CO2 sequestration in coals and enhanced CH4 recovery. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 92(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikatamarla, L., Bustin, R. M., & Cui, X. (2009). CO2 sequestration into coalbeds: insights from laboratory experiments and numerical modeling. In M. Grobe, J. C. Pashin, & R. L. Dodge (Eds.), Carbon dioxide sequestration in geological media—State of the science (Vol. 59, pp. 457–474). California: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., Fowler, M., & Waltzer, K. (2009). “NowGen”; getting real about coal carbon capture and sequestration. The Electricity Journal, 22(4), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condon, S. M., & Dyman, T. S. (2006). 2003 geologic assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in the Upper Cretaceous Navarro and Taylor Groups, Western Gulf Province, Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-H, Chapter 2, 42 pp.

  • Dawson, W. C. (2000). Shale microfacies: Eagle Ford Group (Cenomanian-Turonian) north-central Texas outcrops and subsurface equivalents. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 50, 607–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, W. C., & Almon, W. R. (2002). Top seal potential of Tertiary deep-water Gulf of Mexico shales. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 52, 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, W. C., Katz, B., & Robison, V. D. (1995). Austin Chalk (!) petroleum systems: Upper Cretaceous, southeastern Texas: A case study. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 45, 157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denbury Resources. (2012). Green Pipeline project. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.denbury.com/Corporate-Responsibility/Pipeline-Projects/green-pipeline-project/default.aspx.

  • Dooley, J. J., Dahowski, R. T., & Davidson, C. L. (2009). Comparing existing pipeline networks with the potential scale of future U.S. CO2 pipeline networks. Energy Procedia, 1, 1595–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C. A., Pruess, K., Benson, S. M., Hovorka, S. D., & Green, C. T. (2001). Capacity investigation of brine-bearing sands of the Frio Formation for geologic sequestration of CO2. In Proceedings of the 1st national conference on carbon sequestration, May 14–17, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Washington, DC.

  • Echols, J. B. (2001). The producibility of coalbed methane from Wilcox coals in Louisiana. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 51, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. B. (1981). Upper Wilcox Rosita delta system of South Texas: Growth-faulted shelf-edge deltas. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 65, 54–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Electric Reliability Council of Texas. (2008). Report on existing and potential electric system constraints and needs, December 2008. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.ercot.com/content/news/presentations/2008/2008_Constraints_and_Needs_Report_30DEC2008.pdf.

  • Energy Information Administration. (2010). International energy outlook 2010, world coal production by region, 2007–2035. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/excel/tbl8.xls.

  • Energy Information Administration. (2011a). Electric power annual 2010. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/.

  • Energy Information Administration. (2011b). Electricity consumption. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.cfm#consumption.

  • Essandoh-Yeddu, J., & Gülen, G. (2008). Economic modeling of carbon dioxide integrated pipeline network for enhanced oil recovery and geologic sequestration in the Texas Gulf Coast region. 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), Washington, DC, November 16–20, GCCC Digital Publication Series #08-03 k.

  • Ewing, T. E., & Fergeson, G. (1991). Stratigraphic framework, structural styles, and seismic signatures of downdip Yegua gas-condensate fields, central Wharton County, Texas Gulf Coast. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 41, 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. L. (1969). Facies characterization of Gulf Coast Basin delta systems, with some Holocene depositional analogues. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 19, 239–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. L., & McGowen, J. H. (1967). Depositional systems in the Wilcox Group of Texas and their relationship to occurrence of oil and gas (Vol. 67-4, 22 pp). Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Geological Circular.

  • Galloway, W. E., Ewing, T. E., Garrett, C. M., Tyler, N., & Bebout, D. G. (1983). Atlas of major Texas oil reservoirs (139 pp). Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Special Publication.

  • Gozalpour, F., Ren, S. R., & Tohidi, B. (2005). CO2 EOR and storage in oil reservoirs. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 60, 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, J. C., & Pilcher, R. C. (2000). Coalbed methane potential of the upper Texas Gulf Coast. Coalbed and Coal Mine Methane Conference, Denver, Colorado, March 27–28, Proceedings. New York: Strategic Research Institute, unpaginated.

  • Gülen, G., & Foss, M. (2011). Economic and regulatory considerations for clean coal (abs). American Association of Petroleum Geologists Annual Convention & Exhibition Abstracts, 20, 72.

  • Gunter, W. D., Wong, S., Cheel, D. B., & Sjostrom, G. (1998). Large carbon dioxide sinks: their role in the mitigation of greenhouse gases from an international, national (Canada) and provincial (Alberta) perspective. Applied Energy, 61, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. R., Herzog, H. J., & Parsons, J. E. (2009). Cost and U.S. public policy for new coal power plants with carbon capture and sequestration. Energy Procedia, 1, 4487–4494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, M. H., Ambrose, B., Núñez, V., Moore, M., Lundeen, J. (2005a). Reserve growth potential from enhanced oil recovery along the Gulf Coast. The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology and Petroleum Technology Transfer Council (PTTC) Workshop Notes, variously paginated. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.beg.utexas.edu/pttc/archive/reservegrowth1205.htm.

  • Holtz, M. H., Nance, P., & Finley, R. J. (2001). Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through underground CO2 sequestration in Texas oil reservoirs. Environmental Geoscience, 8, 87–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, M. H., Núñez-López, V., & Breton, C. (2005b). Moving Permian Basin technology to the Gulf Coast: The geologic distribution of CO2 EOR potential in Gulf Coast reservoirs. West Texas Geological Society Publication 05-115, 11 pp.

  • Hovorka, S. D. (2005). Frio brine pilot experiment—Six months after injection. Greenhouse Issues, 77, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovorka, S. D., Doughty, C. S., Benson, S. M., Pruess, K., & Knox, P. R. (2004). The impact of geological heterogeneity on CO2 storage in brine formations: A case study from the Texas Gulf Coast. In S, J. Baines & R. H. Worden (Eds.), Geological storage of carbon dioxide (pp. 147–163). Geological Society of London Special Publication 233.

  • Jacka, A. D. (1982). Compaction and diagenesis of the Upper Cretaceous San Miguel Sandstone, northern Webb County, Texas. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 32, 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. P. A., & Seni, S. J. (1984). Atlas of salt domes in the East Texas Basin. The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations 140, 102 pp.

  • Kaiser, W. R. (1974). Texas lignite: Near-surface and deep-basin resources (Vol. 79, 70 pp). Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations.

  • Kaiser, W. R., Ambrose, M. L., Ayers, W. B., Jr., Blanchard, P. E., Collins, G. F., Fogg, G. E., et al. (1986). Geology and ground-water hydrology of deep-basin lignite in the Wilcox Group of East Texas (182 pp). The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Special Report SR 10.

  • Kaiser, W. R., Ayers, W. B., Jr., & La Brie, L. W. (1980). Lignite resources in Texas (Vol. 104, 52 pp). The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations.

  • King, C., Coleman, S., Cohen, S., & Gülen, G. (2011). The economics of an integrated CO2 capture and sequestration system: Texas Gulf Coast case study. Energy Procedia, 4, 2588–2595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, C. W., Gülen, G., Essandoh-Yeddu, J., & Hovorka, S. (2009). Economic analysis of an integrated anthropogenic carbon dioxide network for capture and enhanced oil recovery along the Texas Gulf Coast. The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, GCCC Digital Publication Series #09-18. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.beg.utexas.edu/gccc/forum/codexdownloadpdf.php?ID=134.

  • Kosters, E. C., Bebout, D. G., Seni, S. J., Garrett, C. M., Jr., Brown, L. F., Jr., Hamlin, H. S., et al. (1989). Atlas of major Texas gas reservoirs (161 pp). The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology.

  • Langenberg, M. A., Henry, D. M., & Chlebana, M. R. (1995). Performance and expansion plans for the double-displacement process in the Hawkins field unit. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper 28603, 301–308.

  • Layden, R. L. (1976). Big Wells field, Dimmit and Zavala Counties, Texas. In J. Braunstein (Ed.), North American oil and gas fields (Vol. 24, pp. 145–156). California: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamora, D. D., & Seo, J. G. (2002). Enhanced gas recovery by carbon dioxide sequestration in depleted gas reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper 77347, 9 pp.

  • Mapel, W. J. (1967). Bituminous coal resources of Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1242-D, Dl–D28.

  • Martin, R., Baihly, J., Malpani, R., Lindsay, G., & Atwood, W. K. (2011). Understanding production from Eagle Ford-Austin Chalk system. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper 145117, 28 pp.

  • Mastalerz, M., Rupp, J., Drobniak, A., Harpalani, S., Anderson, A., Korose, C., et al. (2009). Assessment of CO2 sequestration and enhanced coalbed methane potential in unminable coal seams of the Illinois Basin. In M. Grobe, J. C. Pashin, & R. L. Dodge (Eds.), Carbon dioxide sequestration in geological media—State of the science (Vol. 59, pp. 149–171). California: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollum, D. L., & Ogden, J. M. (2006). Techo-economic models for carbon dioxide compression, transport, and storage and correlations for estimating carbon dioxide density and viscosity. The University of California Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies, Report UCD-ITS-RR-06-14. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://pubs.its.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=1047.

  • McVay, D. A., Ayers, W. B., Jr., & Jensen, J. L. (2007). CO2 sequestration potential of Texas low-rank coals: Texas Engineering Experiment Station. Final Technical Report for the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory under contract DE-FC26-O2NT41588, 127 pp.

  • McVay, D. A., Bello, R. O., Ayers, W. B., Jr., Hernandez, G. A., Rushing, J. A., Ruhl, S. K., et al. (2009). Evaluation of the technical and economic feasibility of CO2 sequestration and enhanced coalbed methane recovery in Texas low-rank coals. In M. Grobe, J. C. Pashin, & R. L. Dodge (Eds.), Carbon dioxide sequestration in geological media—State of the science (Vol. 59, pp. 665–688). California: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, M. B., & Groce, J. F. (1992). A case history of the Hanford San Andres Miscible CO2 project. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 44, 924–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, H., Carolus, M., & Biglarbigi, K. (2008). The potential for additional carbon dioxide flooding projects in the United States. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper 113975, 9 pp.

  • National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2008). Plains CO2 reduction (PCOR) partnership, lignite in North Dakota field validation test. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.netl.doe.gov/events/09conferences/rcsp/pdfs/PCOR%20Lignite%20in%20North%20Dakota%20Williston%20Basin%20Coal%20Seam%20Inje.pdf.

  • National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2010). Carbon sequestration atlas of the United States and Canada (3rd ed). U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/atlasIII/2010atlasIII.pdf.

  • Newcomer, A., & Apt, J. (2008). Implications of generator siting for CO2 pipeline infrastructure. Energy Policy, 36, 1776–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez-López, V., Holtz, M. H., Wood, D. J., Ambrose, W. A., & Hovorka, S. D. (2008). Quick-look assessments to identify optimal CO2 EOR storage sites. Environmental Geology, 54, 1695–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J. N., Blau, J., & Rose, M. (2004). An analysis of the institutional challenges to commercialization and deployment of IGCC technology in the U.S. electric industry: Recommended policy, regulatory, executive and legislative initiatives. National Energy Technology Laboratory. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/FinalReport2-20Vol1.pdf.

  • Oldenburg, C. M., Pruess, K., & Benson, S. M. (2001). Process modeling of CO2 injection into natural gas reservoirs for carbon sequestration and enhanced gas recovery. Energy & Fuels, 15, 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfomak, P. W., & Folger, P. (2008). Carbon dioxide (CO2) pipelines for carbon sequestration: Emerging policy issues. Congressional Research Service, Report No. RL33971. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.marstonlaw.com/index_files/Emerging%20Policy%20issues%20for%20CO2%20pipelines%202008%20CORRECTED%20(2008-01-17%20(No%20RL33971).pdf.

  • Parker, N. (2003). Using natural gas transmission pipeline costs to estimate hydrogen pipeline costs. The University of California Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies, Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-04-3. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9m40m75r.

  • Pearson, K. (2010). Geologic controls on Austin Chalk oil and gas production: Understanding a dual conventional-continuous accumulation. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 60, 557–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway, K. R., & Rosato, R. J. (1991). The Ford Geraldine Unit CO2 flood—Update 1990. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Reservoir Engineering, 6, 410–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railroad Commission of Texas. (2000). The application of Mitchell Energy Corporation for increased net gas oil ratio authority for its Columbus field unit, well No. 1022, Columbus field, Colorado County, Texas. Oil and Gas Docket No. 03-0225068. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from https://www.rrc.state.tx.us/meetings/ogpfd/ogpogor/gorpfd/03-25068p.pdf.

  • Railroad Commission of Texas. (2012). Surface mining: Texas coal production. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from https://www.rrc.state.tx.us/programs/mining/TxCoaLst.pdf.

  • Reeves, S. (2003). Assessment of CO2 sequestration and ECBM potential of U.S. coalbeds: USDOE Topical Report DE-FC26-0NT40924. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.coal-seq.com/Proceedings2003/Assessment%20of%20CO2%20Sequestration%20and%20ECBM%20Potential%20120103.pdf.

  • Robertson, E. P. (2009). Economic analysis of carbon dioxide sequestration in powder river basin coal. International Journal of Coal Geology, 77, 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert, L. F., Kirschbaum, M. A., Warwick, P. D., Flores, R. M., Affolter, R. H., & Hatch, J. R. (2002). The U.S. Geological Survey’s national coal resource assessment. International Journal of Coal Geology, 50, 247–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SanFilipo, J. R. (1999). Some speculations on coal-rank anomalies of the South Texas Gulf Province and adjacent areas of Mexico and their impact on coal-bed methane and source rock potential. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-301, 37–47.

  • Scott, A. R. (2000). Coalbed methane potential in Texas. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 50, 509–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J., & Bachu, S. (2002). Screening, evaluation, and ranking of oil reservoirs suitable for CO2 flood EOR and carbon dioxide sequestration. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 41, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J. Q., & Durucan, S. (2005). CO2 storage in deep unminable coal seams. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 60, 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, J. A. (2008). Determination of carbon dioxide storage capacity and enhanced coalbed methane potential of lignite coals. Energy & Environmental Research Center, The University of North Dakota. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.stacenergy.org/projects/04-STAC-01/08-Final_Report.pdf.

  • Southwest Power Pool. (2011). Southwest Power Pool summary. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.spp.org/.

  • Stanton, R., Flores, R., Warwick, P. D., Gluskoter, H., & Stricker, G. D. (2001). Coal bed sequestration of carbon dioxide. First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Washington D.C. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/01/carbon_seq/3a3.pdf.

  • Texas Department of Transportation. (2009). State railroad map. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/rail/railroad_map.pdf.

  • Texas General Land Office, The Railroad Commission of Texas, The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, & the Bureau of Economic Geology. (2010). Injection and geologic storage regulation of anthropogenic carbon dioxide: preliminary joint report, GCCC Digital Publication Series #10-14. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.beg.utexas.edu/gccc/forum/codexdownloadpdf.php?ID=145.

  • Texas Water Development Board. (1972). A survey of the subsurface saline water in Texas. Texas Water Development Board Report 157, 113 pp.

  • Tyler, N., Gholston, J. C., & Ambrose, W. A. (1987). Oil recovery in a low-permeability, wave-dominated, Cretaceous, deltaic reservoir, Big Wells (San Miguel) field, south Texas. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 71(10), 1171–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy. (2009). Gasification technology R & D. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/gasification/index.html.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Glossary of underground injection control terms. Retrieved September 19, 2012 from http://www.epa.gov/R5water/uic/glossary.htm#usdw.

  • Warwick, P. D., Aubourg, C. E., & Willett, J. C. (1999). Tertiary coals in South Texas: Anomalous cannel-like coals of Webb County (Claiborne Group, Eocene) and lignites of Atascosa County (Jackson Group, Eocene)—Geologic setting, character, source-rock, and coal-bed methane potential. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-301, 55 pp.

  • Weise, B. R. (1980). Wave-dominated delta systems of the Upper Cretaceous San Miguel Formation, Maverick Basin, South Texas (Vol. 107, 39 pp). Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Gulf Coast Carbon Center at the Bureau of Economic Geology acknowledges support of this research by BG Group, BP America, Chevron, Environmental Defense Fund, Exxon-Mobil Corporation, General Electric, KinderMorgan, Luminant, NRG, Saudi Aramco, Schlumberger Carbon Services, Shell, and the Jackson School of Geosciences. The manuscript benefitted from the reviews of J.C. Pashin and an anonymous reviewer. John Ames, under the supervision of Cathy Brown in the Media Information Technology Group, prepared the illustrations. Lana Dieterich edited the manuscript. Publication was authorized by the Director, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. A. Ambrose.

Appendix: List of EOR fields in this study, by number: field: reservoir or stratigraphic unit

Appendix: List of EOR fields in this study, by number: field: reservoir or stratigraphic unit

1: Pearsall: Austin Chalk

2: Harris: No name

3: Big Wells: San Miguel

4: Charlotte: Navarro

5: Falls City: Wilcox

6: Charlotte: No name

7: Slick: Wilcox

8: Person: Edwards

9: Cottonwood Creek, South: Wilcox

10: Burnell: Luling

11: Yoward: No name

12: Karon: Luling

13: Cabeza Creek: Slick Wilcox

14: Panna Maria: Edwards

15: Burnell: No name

16: Caesar South: No name

17: Caesar South: Luling

18: Big Wells East: San Miguel

19: Tulsita: Wilcox

20: Hagist Ranch: Queen City

21: Devils Water Hole: 7000 Sand

22: Charlotte, North: San Miguel-Olmos

23: Charlotte, North: No name

24: Imogene: No name

25: Pruitt: San Miguel-Olmos

26: Burnell: Slick Wilcox

27: Pruitt, Southeast: Olmos

28: Clayton: Queen City B

29: Washburn Ranch: No name

30: Charamousca, West: Wilcox 2

31: Person: Edwards, Upper

32: Boyce: No name

33: Tuleta: no name

34: Burnell: Reclaw

35: Porter: Jackson-Yegua

36: Charamousca, West: Wilcox 2 Segment C

37: Malo Sueno: Jackson-Yegua

38: Horn: San Miguel-Olmos

39: Runge: Wilcox

40: Brandt: Wilcox

41: Hagist Ranch: Wilcox G Sand

42: Viggo: Queen City

43: Barvo: Pettus Segment B, Jackson-Yegua

44: Bruni Southeast: Queen City

45: Richardson: Caddo

46: Harris: Queen

47: Big Wells, Northeast: San Miguel

48: Knox: Mississippi Lime

49: Davis: Ellenburger

50: Gottschalt: Jackson

51: Jennings, West: Queen City

52: Hordes Creek: No name

53: Loma Alta: Wilcox

54: Pleasonton, East: Escondido

55: Meyersville, North: Wilcox

56: Galba: Navarro

57: Bruni: Queen

58: Clayton: Slick Wilcox 6500

59: Giddings: Austin Chalk-3

60: Columbus: Wilcox

61: Giddings: Buda

62: New Ulm: Wilcox

63: Sheridan: Wilcox

64: Vienna: Wilcox

65: Sheridan: Yegua

66: Sheridan, Southwest: Wilcox

67: Columbus Wilcox 11-A

68: Conroe: Yegua

69: Livingston: Yegua

70: Livingston: Wilcox

71: Mercy: No name

72: Halliday: Woodbine

73: Conroe: Cockfield Upper: Yegua

74: Livingston: Sparta

75: Fort Trinidad East: Buda

76: Fort Trinidad East: Dexter C Woodbine

77: OSR: Woodbine

78: Conroe Townsite: Yegua

79: Fort Trinidad: Dexter “A” Woodbine

80: Leona: Sub Clarksville

81: Schwab: Wilcox

82: Madisonville Northeast: Woodbine Dexter

83: Lake Creek: Eocene Deltaic Sandstone No. 5 Sand

84: Cold Springs: Eocene Deltaic Sandstone

85: Day Woodbine

86: Fort Trinidad: Dexter “B” Woodbine

87: Fort Trinidad East: Dexter Woodbine

88: Fort Trinidad: Glen Rose, Upper

89: Mapleton: Durst Sand Woodbine

90: Fort Trinidad North: Buda

91: Lake Creek: Eocene Deltaic Sandstone: No. 1 Sand

92: Neches: Woodbine

93: Quitman: Cretaceous sandstone

94: Long Lake: Woodbine

95: New Hope: Cretaceous sandstone

96: Rodessa: Glen Rose

97: Picton: Glen Rose

98: Picton: No name

99: New Hope: Gen Rose Bacon Lime

100: Haynes: Mitchell Glen Rose

101: Kildare: Glen Rose

102: Tatum: Pettit Lower

103: Wright Mountain: Pettit Lower

104: Opelika: Glen Rose

105: Shiloh: Pettit Upper

106: Chapel Hill: Cretaceous sandstone

107: New Hope: Hill Sand, Cretaceous sandstone

108: Quitman: Sub Clarksville

109: Carthage: Sabine Uplift shallow marine sandstone

110: Woodlawn: Glen Rose

111: Midway Lake: Cretaceous Salt-Related Structures

112: Navarro Crossing: Woodbine

113: Hallsville, Northeast: Pettit

114: Pine Mills: Woodbine

115: Good Omen: Pettit

116: Jacksonville, North: Woodbine

117: Chapel Hill: Travis Peak

118: Carthage: Burnett Sands, Glen Rose

119: Rodessa: Glen Rose Dees-Young

120: Long Lake East: Woodbine

121: Slocum West: Woodbine

122: Tennessee Colony: Rodessa Lower

123: Salmon: Sub Clarksville

124: Danville: Pettit Upper

125: Lake Ferrell: Pettit Upper

126: Friendship: Rodessa

127: Slocum Northwest: Woodbine C

128: Kildare: Pettit

129: Carbondale: Smackover 9660

130: Linden East: Cotton Valley

131: Grapeland: Woodbine

132: Grapeland: No name

133: Tennessee Colony: Pettit

134: William Wise: No name

135: Vicki Lynn: Rodessa

136: Rodessa: Glen Rose Gloyd

137: Waskom: Hurley Orr Sabine Uplift Cretaceous Sandstone

138: Oakwood Dome: Woodbine

139: Cayuga, Northwest: Rodessa

140: Bethany: Travis Peak A Sandstone

141: Malakoff, South: Bacon Lime Glen Rose

142: Whelan: Pettit Upper

143: Tyler: Cretaceous sandstone

144: Slocum: Sub Clarksville

145: Barkley: Woodbine

146: Slocum North: Sub Clarksville

147: Quitman: Rodessa

148: Carthage: Travis Peak 6400

149: Pone: Basal Pettit

150: Pine Mills: Paluxy

151: Pine Mills: Woodbine Wagoner

152: Mount Sylvan Cretaceous Sandstone, Salt-Related Structures

153: Coke: Young Zone Glen Rose

154: Reka 6800: Unknown

155: Newsome: Pittsburg 8200

156: La Rue: Glen Rose

157: Rodessa Northwest: Mitchell Glen Rose

158: Carthage: Sabine Uplift shallow marine sandstone

159: Woodlawn: Glen Rose Hill

160: Winnsboro: Glen Rose Carbonate

161: Slocum Northwest: Woodbine D

162: Cyril: Travis Peak 7650

163: Rodessa: Glen Rose Hill

164: Carthage: Travis Peak Southwest 6400

165: Reilly Springs: Smackover

166: Good Omen: Woodbine

167: Segno Deep: Eocene Deltaic Sandstone

168: Joes Lake: Eocene Deltaic Sandstone

169: Hillister East: Eocene Deltaic Sandstone, Cockfield Fifth

170: Theuvenins Creek: Wilcox 8400

171: Drake’’s Branch: Yegua Cockfield Third

172: Quicksand Creek: Wilcox 10400

173: Hillister East: Eocene Deltaic Sandstone

174: Bon Weir: Eocene Deltaic Sandstone

175: Theuvenins Creek: Wilcox 8500

176: Drake’s Branch: Yegua Cockfield First

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ambrose, W.A., Breton, C., Núñez-López, V. et al. Geologic and Economic Criteria for Siting Clean-Coal Facilities in the Texas Gulf Coast, USA. Nat Resour Res 21, 461–482 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-012-9188-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-012-9188-y

Keywords

Navigation