Skip to main content
Log in

A Spatially Autocorrelated Weights of Evidence Model

  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most important features of spatial datasets is that they often exhibit spatial autocorrelation, where locational similarities are observed jointly with similarities in values. Both logistic regression (LR) modelling and weights of evidence (WE) modelling are methods commonly applied in binary pattern recognition. While a spatially autocorrelated variant of the LR model, the so-called autologistic regression (ALR) model, exists in the literature, a spatially autocorrelated variant of the WE model does not exist. In this paper, a spatially autocorrelated weights of evidence (SACWE) model will be proposed. It will be demonstrated that the new model contains the same amount of spatial information as does an ALR model, and it is easy to program and implement. Via a simulation study, it will be shown that, in the presence of spatial autocorrelation, both in terms of in-sample fit and out-of-sample predictions the SACWE model is on par with the ALR model, while significantly outperforming the conventional WE model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agterberg, F. P., 1992, Combining indicator patterns in weights of evidence modelling for resource evaluation: Nonrenew. Res., v. 1, no. 1, p. 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P., and Bonham-Carter, G. F., 1999, Logistic regression and weights of evidence modelling in mineral exploration, in Computer Applications in the Mineral Industries: Golden, CO, p. 483–490.

  • Agterberg, F. P., Bonham-Carter, G. F., and Wright, D. F., 1990, Statistical pattern integration for mineral exploration, in Gaál, G., and Merriam, D. F., eds., Computer Applications in Resource Exploration Prediction and Assessment for Metals and Petroleum: Oxford, Pergamon, p. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P., Bonham-Carter, G. F., Wright, D. F., and Cheng, Q., 1993, Weights of evidence modelling and weighted logistic regression for mineral potential mapping, in Davis, J. C., and Herzfeld, U. C., eds., Computers in Geology, 25 Years of Progress: Oxford University Press, New York, p. 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T., 1981, Qualitative response models: a survey: J. Econ. Lit., v. 19, p. 1483–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., 1980, Estimation methods for spatial autoregressive structures: a study in spatial econometrics: Regional Science Dissertation and Monograph Series 8, Program in Urban and Regional Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 273 p.

  • Anselin, L. 1988, Spatial econometrics: methods and models: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 284 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustin, N. H., Mugglestone, M. A., and Buckland, S. T., 1996, An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife: J. Appl. Ecol., v. 33, p. 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin, N. H., Mugglestone, M. A., and Buckland, S. T., 1998, The role of simulation in modelling spatially correlated data: Environmetrics, v. 9, p. 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J., 1972, Nearest-neighbour systems and the auto-logistic model for binary data: J. R. Stat. Soc. B, v. 34, p. 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J., 1974, Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion): J. R. Stat. Soc. B, v. 36, p. 192–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J., 1975, Statistical analysis of non-lattice data: Statistician, v. 24, p. 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter, G. F., 1994, Geographic Information Systems for geoscientists: Oxford, Pergamon, 398 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter, G. F., Agterberg, F. P., and Wright, D. F., 1988, Integration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia: Photogram. Remote Sens., v. 54, no. 11, p. 1585–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter, G. F., Agterberg, F. P., and Wright, D. F., 1989, Weights of evidence modelling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential, in Agterberg, F. P. and Bonham-Carter, G. F., eds., Statistical Applications in the Earth Sciences: Geological Survey Canada Paper 9-9, p. 171–183.

  • Cliff, A. D., and Ord, J. K., 1973, Spatial autocorrelation: Pion, London, 178 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comets, F., 1992, On consistency of a class of estimators for exponential families of Markov random fields on the lattice: Ann. Stat., v. 20, no. 1, p. 445–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. A. C., 1993, Statistics for spatial data, revised edition: Wiley, New York, 900 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahal, R. K., Hasegawa, S., Nonomura, A., Yamanaka, M., Masuda, T., and Nishino, K., 2008, GIS-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping: Environ. Geol., v. 54, p. 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, M., 2009, A conditional dependence adjusted weights of evidence model: Nat. Resour. Res. doi:10.1007/s11053-009-9101-5.

  • Emelyanova, I. V., Donald, G. E., Miron, D. J., Henry, D. A., and Garner, M. G., 2008, Probabilistic modelling of cattle farm distribution in Australia: Environ. Model. Assess., v. 14, p. 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haining, R., 1985, The spatial structure of competition and equilibrium price dispersion: Geograph. Anal., v. 17, p. 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. T., 2000, Describing GIS applications: spatial statistics and weights of evidence extension to ArcView in the analysis of the distribution of archeology sites in the landscape: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, CA.

  • Hansen, D. T., West, J., Simpson, B., and Welch, P., 2002, Modeling spatial uncertainty in analysis of archeological site distribution: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, CA.

  • Huffer, F. W., and Wu, H., 1998, Markov Chain Monte Carlo for autologistic regression models with application to the distribution of plant species: Biometrics, v. 54, p. 509–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., and Dinardo, J., 1997, Econometric methods, 4th ed.: McGraw-Hill, New York, 531 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, J., Jha, V. K., and Rawat, G. S., 2007, Weights of evidence modelling for landslide hazard zonation mapping in part of Bhagirathi valley, Uttarakhand: Curr. Sci., v. 92, no. 5, p. 628–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord, J. K., 1975, Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction: J. Am. Stat. Assoc., v. 70, p. 120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Calcerrada, R., and Luque, S., 2006, Habitat quality assessment using Weights-of-Evidence based GIS modelling: the case of Picoides tridactylus as species indicator of the biodiversity value of the Finnish forest: Ecol. Modell., v. 196, p. 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. R., 1970, A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit Region: Econ. Geogr., v. 46, p. 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining, D. J., and Gladish, G. W., 1992, Receiver operating characteristic curves: a basic understanding: RadioGraphics, v. 12, p. 1147–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintle, B. A., and Bardos, D. C., 2006, Modeling species-habitat relationships with spatially autocorrelated observation data: Ecol. Appl., v. 16, no. 5, p. 1945–1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., and Huffer, F. W., 1997, Modelling the distribution of plant species using the autologistic regression model: Environ. Ecol. Stat., v. 4, p. 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, M. H., and Cambell, G., 1993, Receiver operator characteristic plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine: Clin. Chem., v. 39, p. 561–577.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author thanks Jerry Jensen and the reviewers for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minfeng Deng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deng, M. A Spatially Autocorrelated Weights of Evidence Model. Nat Resour Res 19, 33–44 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-009-9107-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-009-9107-z

Keywords

Navigation