Abstract
This study is a compilation of results obtained during the cleanout of deposition equipment such as chemical vapor deposition or physical vapor deposition The measurement campaigns aimed to evaluate the potential exposure to nanoaerosols in the occupational environment and were conducted in the workspace. The characterization of aerosols includes measurements of the concentration using condensation particle counters and measurements of the size distribution using fast mobility particle sizer, scanning mobility particle sizer, and electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI). Particles were sampled using collection membranes placed on the ELPIs stages. The samples were analyzed with an SEM–EDS to provide information including size, shape, agglomeration state, and the chemical composition of the particles. The majority of the time, no emission of nanoparticles (NPs) was measured during the use of the molecular deposition equipment or when opening the chambers, mainly due to the enclosed processes. On the other hand, the maintenance of the equipment, and especially the cleanout step, could induce high concentrations of NPs in the workplace following certain processes. Values of around 1 million particles/cm3 were detected with a size distribution including a high concentration of particles around 10 nm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bello D, Hart AJ, Ahn K, Hallock M, Yamamoto N, Garcia EJ, Ellenbecker M, Wardle BL (2008) Particle exposure levels during CVD growth and subsequent handling of vertically aligned carbon nanotube films. Carbon 46:974–981. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2008.03.003
Brouwer D, van Duuren-Stuurman B, Berges M, Jankowska E, Bard D, Mark D (2009) From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects. J Nanopart Res 11:1867–1881. doi:10.1007/s11051-009-9772-1
Demou E, Peter P, Hellweg S (2008) Exposure to manufactured particles in an industrial pilot plant. Ann Occup Hyg 52(8):695–706. doi:10.1093/annhyg/ment058
Durand C, Ravanel X, Derrough S, Zimmermann E et al (2011) Characterization of manufactured nanoparticles at workplace. J Phys Conf Ser 304. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/304/012003
Lee JH, Kwon M, Ji JH, Kang CS, Ahn KH, Han JH, Yu IJ (2011) Exposure assessment of workplaces manufacturing nanosized TiO2 and silver. Inhalation Toxicol 23:226–236. doi:10(3109/08958378),2011,562567
Leppänen M, Lyyränen J, Järvelä M, Auvinen A, Jokiniemi J, Pimenoff J, Tuomi T (2011) Exposure to Ce02 nanoparticles during flame spray process. Nanotoxicol Early Online 1-9. doi:10(3109/17435390).2011.600838
Maynard A, Aitken R (2007) Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: current abilities and future requirements. Nanotoxicology 1(1):26–41. doi:10.1080/17435390701314720
Maynard A, Baron P, Foley M, Shvedova A, Kisin E, Castranova V (2004) Exposure to carbon nanotube material: aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single-walled carbon nanotube material. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 67:87–107. doi:10.1080/15287390490253688
Methner M, Hodson L, Geraci C (2009a) Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials-part A. J Occup Environ Hyg 7(3):127–132. doi:10.1080/15459620903476355
Methner M, Hodson L, Dames A, Geraci C (2009b) Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials-Part B: results from 12 fields studies. J Occup Environ Hyg 7(3):163–176. doi:10.1080/15459620903508066
Old L, Methner M (2008) Engineering case reports, effectiveness of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) in controlling engineered nanomaterial emissions during reactor cleanout operations. J Occup Environ Hyg 5(6):D63–D69. doi:10.1080/15459620802059393
Sahu M, Biswas P (2010) Size distributions of aerosols in an indoor environment with engineered nanoparticle synthesis reactor operating under different scenarios. J Nanopart Res 12:1055–1064. doi:10.1007/s11051-10-9874-9
Tsai S, Hofmann M, Hallock M, Ada E, Kong J, Ellenbecker M (2009) Characterization and evaluation of nanoparticles release during the synthesis of single walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition. Environ Sci Technol 43(15):6017–6023
US EPA (2007) Nanotechnology white paper. http://epa.gov/ncer/nano/publications/whitepaper12022005.pdf. Accessed 5th Dec 2011
Wu HC, Chang RI, Hsiao HC (2009) Research of minimum ignition energy for nano titanium powder and nano iron powder. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(1):21–24. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2008.10.002
Yeganeh B, Kull CM, Hull MS, Marr LC (2008) Characterization of airborne particles during production of carbonaceous nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 42(12):4600–4606
Acknowledgments
This study has been performed thanks to funds associated with the safety part of the Nano-Innov project, launched by the French Government in May 2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Special Issue Editors: Candace S.-J. Tsai, Michael J. Ellenbecker
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmermann, E., Derrough, S., Locatelli, D. et al. Results of potential exposure assessments during the maintenance and cleanout of deposition equipment. J Nanopart Res 14, 1209 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1209-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1209-6