Abstract
The growing importance of nanotechnology in industry and society has not been accompanied by a widespread understanding of the subject among the general public. Simple questions to initially probe the smallest thing that people can see and can think of reveals a divide in the understanding of the general public. A survey of 1500 individuals ranging in age from 6 to 74 has revealed a lack of knowledge of nanotechnology and especially a lack of understanding of the context of nanotechnology in the world that is too small to see. Survey findings are corroborated by in-depth interviews with 400 adults in studies of nanoscience literacy commisioned by University of California, Berkeley and Cornell in 2002 and 2004, respectively. In general, with the exception of 14–28 year olds, over 60% of respondents say they have never heard of nano or nanotechnology. The results suggest that the general public, especially middle-school children, has no firm foundation to understand nanotechnology and likely will continue to be equally impressed by credible scientific information as well as pure fictional accounts of nanotechnology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bainbridge W. (2002) Public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4: 561–570
Cobb M., Macoubrie J. (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. J. Nanoparticle Res. 6: 395–405
Dowling A., 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. from http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm
Drexler K.E. (2004) Nanotechnology: From feynman to funding. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 24(1): 21–27
Driver R., Squires A., Rushworth P., Wood-Robinson V. (1994) Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. Routledge, London
Einsiedel E.F., Goldenberg L. (2004) Dwarfing the social? Nanotechnology lessons from the biotechnology front. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 24(1): 28–33
Friedman S.M., Egold B.P. (2005) Nanotechnology: Risks and the media. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 24(4): 5–11
Halford B., 2004. An idea run amok. Chem. Eng. News 80(30), 45
Knight H. & J. Pierce, 2003. To kill a technology. The Engineer 291, 25–29
Mehta M.D. (2004) From biotechnology to nanotechnology: What can we learn from earlier technologies? Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 24(1): 34–39
Mills K., Fledderman C. (2005). Getting the best from nanotechnology: Approaching social and ethical implications openly and proactively. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 24(4): 18–26
Morrissey S.R., 2004. Harnessing nanotechnology. Chem. Eng. News 82(16), 30–33
NYSED, 2004. New york state standards for math, science and technology: NYS Education Department
Pilarski L.M., Mehta M.D., Caulfield T., Kaler K.V.I.S., Backhouse C.J. (2004) Microsystems and nanoscience for biomedical applications: A view to the future. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 24(1): 40–45
Roco M.C. (2003a) Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Res. 5(3–4): 181–189
Roco M.C. (2003b) Public affairs forum – national nanotechnology initiative to advance broad societal goals. MRS Bull. 28(6): 416
Roco M.C., Bainbridge W.S. (2005) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit. J. Nanoparticle Res. 7(1): 1–13
Schulz W.G., 2002. Nanotechnology under the scope. Chem. Eng. News 82(10), 23–24
Service R.F., 2004. Nanotech forum aims to head off replay of past blunders. Science 306(5698), 955
Spencer D., 2003. Evaluating public readiness for and interest in learning new science. (White paper presenting pedagogy guidelines for introducing nano-science based on findings from a national study interviewing over 1000 youth.): EDU Inc
Spencer D. & V. Angelotti, 2004. It’s a nano world: A study of use – findings from a summative study: EDU, Inc
Waldron A.M., K. Sheppard, C.A. Batt & D. Spencer, 2005. Too small to see: Educating the next generation in nanoscale science and engineering. In: Kumar C.S., Hormes J. and Leuschner C. eds. Nanofabrication towards biomedical applications. Germany: Wiley VCH
Weil V., Nov 2003. Zeroing in on ethical issues in nanotechnology. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE
Acknowledgement
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Nanoscale Informal Science Education Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waldron, A.M., Spencer, D. & Batt, C.A. The current state of public understanding of nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 8, 569–575 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9112-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9112-7