Abstract
This paper presents novel data regarding the logophoric pronoun in Ewe. We show that, contrary to what had been assumed in the absence of the necessary fieldwork, Ewe logophors are not obligatorily interpreted de se. We discuss the prima facie rather surprising nature of this discovery given the assumptions that de se construals arise via binding of the pronoun by an abstraction operator in the left periphery of the clausal complement of an attitude predicate, and that logophors are elements that are obligatorily bound by such abstractors. We show that this approach can be reconciled with these facts given the additional assumption that elements that are ‘de se’ bound can interact with the concept generator variables posited by Percus and Sauerland (Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 7, 2003a; Proceedings of NELS 33, 2003b) to derive de re interpretations of embedded nominals. The proposed set-up has consequences for our understanding of puzzles raised by Heim and Sharvit concerning binding-theoretic effects with de re elements, and for the derivation of the obligatorily de se interpretation of controlled PRO.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abusch, D. 1997. Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 1–50.
Anand, P., and A. Nevins. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts. In Proceedings of SALT 14, ed. R. Young, 20–37. Ithaca: CLC Publications.
Anand, P. 2006. De de se. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Arregui, A. 2007. Being me, being you: Pronoun puzzles in modal contexts. In Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 11, ed. E. Puig-Waldmάler, 31?45. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Castañeda, H. 1968. On the logic of attributions of self-knowledge to others. Journal of Philosophy 54: 439–456.
Charlow, S., and Y. Sharvit. 2014. Rethinking the LFs of attitude reports. Semantics and Pragmatics 7: 1–43.
Chierchia, G. 1990. Anaphora and attitudes de se. In Semantics and contextual expression, ed. R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas, 1–32. Dordrecht: Foris.
Clements, G. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–177.
Deal, A.R., and M.C. O’Connor. 2010. The perspectival basis of fluid-S case-marking in Northern Pomo. In Proceedings of SULA 5, ed. S. Lima, 173–188. Amherst: GLSA.
Frajzyngier, Z. 1985. Logophoric systems in Chadic. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7: 23–37.
Hagège, C. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69: 287–310.
Haida, A. 2009. (Proto-)logophoricity in Tangale. Handout of talk given at NELS 40, MIT.
Heim, I. 1994. Puzzling reflexive pronouns in de se reports. Handout of talk given at the University of Bielefield.
Heim, I. 2001. Semantics and morphology of person and logophoricity. Handout of talk given at the University of Tübingen.
Heim, I. 2002. Features of pronouns in semantics and morphology. Handout of talk given at USC.
Hintikka, J. 1969. Semantics for propositional attitudes. In Philosophical logic, ed. J.W. Davis and D.J. Hockney, 21–45. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hyman, L. 1979. Aghem Grammatical Structure. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 7. Los Angeles: USC.
Hyman, L., and B. Comrie. 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37.
Kaplan, D. 1968. Quantifying in. Synthese 19(1–2): 178–214.
Kratzer, A. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2): 187–237.
Kusumoto, K. 1998. Tenses as logophoric pronouns. Handout of talk given at the MIT/UConn/UMass Semantics Workshop.
Lakoff, G. 1970. Linguistics and natural logic. Synthese 22(1–2): 151–271.
Lewis, D. 1979. Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review 88(4): 513–543.
Morgan, J. 1970. On the criterion of identity for noun phrase deletion. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the CLS, 380–389. Chicago: The Chicago Linguistics Society.
Ninan, D. 2012. Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centred worlds. Semantics and Pragmatics 5: 1–57.
Orita, N. 2009. Syntax and semantics of logophoricity in Ewe. MA thesis, Kobe Shoin Graduate School of Letters.
Pearson, H. 2013a. A judge-free semantics for predicates of personal taste. Journal of Semantics 30: 103–154.
Pearson, H. 2013b. The sense of self: topics in the semantics of de se expressions. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Percus, O., and Sauerland, U. 2003a. On the LFs of attitude reports. In Proceedings of ‘Sinn und Bedeutung 7’, 228–242. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.
Percus, O., and Sauerland, U. 2003b. Pronoun movement in dream reports. In Proceedings of NELS 33, 347–366. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Perry, J. 1979. The problem of the essential indexical. Nous 13: 3?21.
Quine, W.V. 1956. Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 53: 177–187.
Roberts, C. 1989. Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 683–721.
Schlenker, P. 1999. Propositional attitudes and indexicality: A cross-categorial approach. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Schlenker, P. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 29–120.
Sharvit, Y. 2011. Covaluation and unexpected BT effects. Journal of Semantics 28: 55–106.
Stephenson, T. 2007a. Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 487–525.
Stephenson, T. 2007b. Towards a theory of subjective meaning. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Stephenson, T. 2010. Control in centred worlds. Journal of Semantics 27: 409–436.
Thomas, E. 1978. A grammatical description of the Engenni language. SIL Publication No. 60. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
von Stechow, A. 2002. Binding by verbs: tense, person and mood under attitudes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Tübingen.
von Stechow, A. 2003. Feature deletion under semantic binding. In Proceedings of NELS 33, ed. M. Kadowaki, and S. Kawahara, 133–157. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Voorhoeve, J. 1980. Le pronom logophorique et son importance pour la reconstruction du proto-bantou. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 2: 173–187.
Yanovich, I. 2011. The problem of counterfactual de re attitudes. In Proceedings of SALT 21, ed. N. Ashton et al., 56–75. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Pearson, H. The interpretation of the logophoric pronoun in Ewe. Nat Lang Semantics 23, 77–118 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-015-9112-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-015-9112-1