Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Along the time line

Tense and time adverbs in Italian Sign Language

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Italian Sign Language (LIS), when past or future time adverbs are present, the signs for verbs exhibit the same manual configurations whether the sentence reports a past event or a future event. Facts of this kind, also observed for American Sign Language (ASL) and other sign languages, have led some authors (Friedman, among others) to conclude that these languages, on a par with spoken languages like Chinese, lack grammatical tense. Neidle et al. and Jacobowitz and Stokoe have challenged this view for ASL and have argued that ASL sentences contain tense markers. I present some data showing that LIS verbs inflect for tense. I argue, moreover, that the apparent lack of tense inflection when LIS past and future time adverbs are present is due to the fact that these adverbs shift the s-point and that LIS past and future tenses are absolute tenses. I provide a formal account of the LIS tense system based on these assumptions. The account is implemented in Heim’s analysis of tense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahan, Benjamin. 1996. Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. PhD diss., Boston University.

  • Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1991. Il verbo. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 2, ed. Lorenzo Renzi and Giampaolo Salvi, 13–161, Bologna: Il Mulino.

  • Branchini, Chiara. 2007. Relatives and related constructions in Italian Sign Language. PhD diss., Università degli Studi di Urbino.

  • Branchini, Chiara, and Caterina Donati. 2006. Italian Sign Language relatives: Correlatives, internally headed or free relatives? Manuscript, Università degli Studi di Urbino.

  • Brennan, Mary. 1983. Marking time in British Sign Language. In Language in sign: International perspectives on sign language (Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of Sign Language Research in Bristol UK, July 1981), ed. Jim Kyle and Bencie Woll, 10–31. London: Croom Helm.

  • Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci, and Sandro Zucchi. 2006. Strategies of relativization in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(4): 945–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Venneman, 506–569. Berlin: de Gruyter. Reprinted with minor revisions in Chomsky (1995).

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal Veneeta. (1996) Locality in wh-quantifications. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty David. (1982) Tenses, time adverbs and compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England Nora C. (1983) A grammar of Mam, a Mayan language. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Susan D. 1978. Sign language and creoles. In Understanding language through sign language research, ed. Patricia Siple, 309–331, New York: Academic Press.

  • Fischer, Susan D., and Bonnie Gough. 1999. Some unfinished thoughts on FINISH. Sign Language and Linguistics 2(1): 67–78. Manuscript circulating since 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman Lynn A. (1975) Space, time, and person reference in American Sign Language. Language 51(4): 940–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, Alessandra, and Fabio Pianesi. 1998. Present tense, perfectivity and the anchoring conditions. In Proceedings of IATL-97, ed. Adam Z. Wyner. Israel: Bar-Ilan University.

  • Heim, Irene. 1997. Tense in compositional semantics: Introduction. Handout for the MIT seminar on tense, aspect and events, Spring 1997.

  • Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein Norbert. (1990) As time goes by. Tense and universal grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, Sabine. 1993. On nominative case assignment and a few related things. In MIT working papers in linguistics 19: papers on case and agreement II, ed. Colin Phillips, 175–196.

  • Jacobowitz E. Lynn, William C. Stokoe. (1988) Signs of tense in ASL Verbs. Sign Language Studies 60: 331–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, Irit. 1998. Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. PhD diss., Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

  • Meir Irit. (1999) A perfect marker in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics 2(1): 43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meir Irit. (2002) A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 413–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan, and Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language. Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Outstanding dissertations in linguistics, New York: Garland Press.

  • Pizzuto, Elena, Emanuela Cameracanna, Serena Corazza, and Virginia Volterra. 1995. Terms for spatiotemporal relations in Italian Sign Language. In Iconicity in language, ed. Raffaele Simone, 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Reichenbach Hans. (1947) Elements of symbolic logic. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebba Mark. (1997) Contact languages. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimoyama Junko. (1999) Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and e-type anaphora. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 147–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanelli, Laura. 1991. La concordanza dei tempi. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 2, ed. Lorenzo Renzi and Giampaolo Salvi, 611–632. Bologna: Il Mulino.

  • von Stechow, Arnim. 1999. The LOT99-lectures at Postdam. Manuscript, University of Tübingen.

  • Zucchi, Sandro. 2001. Tense in fiction. In Semantic interfaces: Reference, anaphora, and aspect, ed. Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia, and Maria Teresa Guasti, 320–356. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Zucchi, Sandro. 2005. The present mode. In Reference and quantification: The Partee effect, ed. Gregory N. Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier, 1–28. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Filosofia, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milano, Italy

    Sandro Zucchi

Authors
  1. Sandro Zucchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Zucchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zucchi, S. Along the time line. Nat Lang Semantics 17, 99–139 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-008-9032-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-008-9032-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation