Abstract
Expletive Negation is widespread in human languages. Although many semantic, pragmatic and syntactic hypotheses about it have been advanced, it still remains puzzling. Two questions, particularly, need to be faced: (i) what are the contexts, mainly syntactic, where negation receives its vacuous interpretation? (ii) Is EN a phenomenon grammatically distinct from standard negation or are they the same one? In this article I will provide empirical and theoretical arguments to show that EN derives from a particular syntactic configuration by investigating a case of Italian EN, i.e. Surprise Negation Sentences. More specifically, I will propose that the Italian negative marker “non” (“not”) has a twofold interpretation encoded in syntax: (i) when it is merged in the TP-area during the v*P-phase, it gives the standard negative interpretation reversing the truth-value conditions of a sentence; (ii) when it is merged in the CP domain and the v*P-phase is already closed, it gives the expletive interpretation shown in Snegs. From this point of view, the expletive reading of negation is just a reflex of the syntactic context in which negation is introduced.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
According to DeLancey (1997, 2001) and Aikhenvald (2005), some languages display a specific morpheme to mark the unexpected nature of the information, something shocking or surprising the speaker. For example, Turkish shows the suffix -mis as a mark of unexpectedness. See Rett and Murray (2013) for a semantic analysis of mirativity and Cruschina (2012) for a discussion of Italian cases. For a discussion on Wh-interrogatives with a “surprise” value, see Obenauer (2006).
NRQs seem to be consistently inappropriate when they are employed as answers to questions. I thank the editor for drawing my attention to this fact.
I would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for pointing out another difference between NRQ and Snegs: in the former case the Italian negative marker “non” can be translated in English as “not,” in the latter case this is not possible. This fact further reinforces the idea that the two structures are different (I will examine the nature of this difference in the Sect. 4).
Crucially, the two structures differ grammatically. See Greco (2019b) for a detailed discussion.
In order to adapt this hypothesis to languages displaying a unique morpheme for both standard and expletive negation—such as Italian—it has been proposed that the same negative marker realizes two different negations, Neg1 and Neg2.
- (ii)
See Makri (2013) for a criticism to this proposal.
This twofold classification takes into account the distribution of some phenomena, such as the subject-clitic inversion. See the original works for a detailed discussion.
For a similar idea, see Villalba (2004).
This conclusion takes into consideration the pattern with topicalized and focalized phrases in situ as well (Belletti 2001, 2004a, 2004b;). According to Rizzi (1997), those elements display a (covert) movement to the left periphery (see also Calabrese 1992) and, therefore, their incompatibility with Snegs further confirms the centrality of the CP-layer in the Snegs syntactic definition.
According to an anonymous reviewer, in his/her variety of Italian it is possible to have the form “no” in some colloquial sentences that are alike to Snegs:
- (iv)
Unfortunately, this sentence is not fine to my informants or to me. A different linguistic substratum can cause the differences in the grammatical judgments. Future research will shed light on this issue.
This position is one of the two parametrical values proposed by Ouhalla (1990).
According to the schema in (74), the word order not>subject>verb is the expected one in Snegs since the negative marker dominates the whole TP which host the subject in its specifier position (between negation and the verb).
This observation can also be extended to those cases in which the whole TP is moved to [Spec, FocP]. Consider, for example, strong and weak NPIs in answers to questions (I have to thank an anonymous reviewer for making me think of this case):
- (i)
As the editor observed, weak-NPIs can generally be licensed from negations in higher clauses / phrases. This does not seem completely true in Italian. Consider, for example, the weak NPI mai (ever): it cannot be licensed from the higher-clause negation (a), requiring a clause-mate negation to be rescued (b):
- (i)
See below for a more detailed discussion.
I leave to the original works the debate on these approaches.
See the original studies for the detailed discussion.
Interestingly, Alonso-Ovalle and Guerzoni (2004) discuss cases in which a singular neg-word represents the short answer to a question. Consider, for example, the following dialog: A: Chi è venuto? (‘Who came?’); B: Nessuno (‘Nobody’). In order to explain the syntactic configuration of B, they propose that Foc° hosts a negative feature that is semantically active but phonologically empty. This would be the reason why neg-words occur in pre-verbal positions without a negative marker. The tight relation between focus and negation catches an aspect presented in my proposal as well.
I took the following examples from Moro (2003).
Italian shows other cases similar to tipo che, such as si che/no che (see Poletto and Zanuttini 2013). I have to thank an anonymous reviewer for this observation.
This may also be the reason why Italian does not have negative complementizers since complementizers in Italian are often introduced in ForceP, a functional phrase that is merged after the phase-head Foc°.
References
Abels, Klaus. 2002. Expletive (?) negation. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL) 10, ed. Jindrich Toman, 1–21. Bloomington: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Abels, Klaus. 2005. “Expletive negation” in Russian: A conspiracy theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 13(1): 5–74.
Aikhenvald, Y. Alexandra. 2005. Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, and Elena Guerzoni. 2004. Double negation, negative concord and metalinguistic negation. In Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS) 38–1: Main session, eds. Andronis Debenport and Pycha Yoshimura, 15–31. Chicago: CLS Publications.
Avesani, Cinzia. 1990. A contribution to the synthesis of Italian intonation. In International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) 1, 833–836. Available at http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/icslp_1990. Accessed 27 August 2019.
Barrie, Michael. 2007. Control and Wh-infinitivals. In The analysis of control and raising, eds. William Davies and Stanley Dubinsky, 263–279. Dordrecht: Springer.
Beckman, Mary, Julia Hirschberg, and Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2005. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, ed. Sun-Ah Jun, 9–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized verb movement. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
Belletti, Adriana. 1992. Agreement and case in past participial clauses in Italian. In Syntax and the lexicon, eds. Tim Stowell and Eric Wehrli, 21–44. New York: Academic Press.
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. “Inversion” as focalization. In Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar, eds. Aafke Hulk and Jean-Yves Pollock. New York: Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana. 2004a. Aspects of the low IP area. In The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, ed. Luigi Rizzi. Vol. 2, 16–51. New York: Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana. 2004b. Structures and beyond: the cartography of syntactic structures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana. 2006. (Past) participle Agreement. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 493–521. Oxford: Blackwell.
Benincà, Paola. 1996. La struttura della frase esclamativa alla luce del dialetto padovano. In Italiano e dialetti nel tempo: saggi di grammatica per Giulio C. Lepschy, eds. Paola Benincà, Guglielmo Cinque, Tullio De Mauro, and Nigel Vincent, 23–43. Roma: Bulzoni.
Benincà, Paola. 1988. L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, ed. Lorenzo Renzi. Vol. 1. 115–194. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Benincà, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, ed. Luigi Rizzi, 52–75. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bernini, Giuliano, and Paolo Ramat. 1996. Negative sentences in the languages of Europe: A typological approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bianchi, Valentina, and Cristiano Chesi. 2014. Subject islands, reconstruction, and the flow of the computation. Linguistic Inquiry 45(4): 525–569.
Bianchi, Valentina, and Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2: 43–88.
Bocci, Giuliano. 2007. Criterial positions and left periphery in Italian: Evidence for the syntactic encoding of contrastive focus. Nanzan Linguistics (Special Issue) 3: 35–70.
Boneh, Nora, and Léa Nash. 2012. Core and non-core datives in French. In Variation in datives: A microcomparative perspective, eds. Beatriz Fernández, and Ricardo Exteparre, 22–49. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bošković, Željko. 2002. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5:167–218.
Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1): 27–89.
Brody, Mihály. 1990. Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 201–225.
Brown, Sue, and Steve Franks. 1995. Asymmetries in the scope of Russian negation. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 3: 239–287.
Brunetti, Lisa. 2003. “Information” focus movement in Italian and contextual constraints on ellipsis. In West Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 22, eds. Gina Garding and Mimu Tsujimura, 95–108. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Brunetti, Lisa. 2004. A unification of focus. Padova: Unipress.
Brunetti, Lisa. 2008. On the pragmatics of post-focal material in Italian (left peripheral focus looked at from the other side). In Les linguistiques du détachement: Actes du colloque de Nancy (7–9 juin 2006), eds. Denis Apothéloz, Bernard Combettes, and Franck Neveu, 151–162. Bern: Peter Lang.
Calabrese, Andrea. 1992. Some remarks on focus and logical structures in Italian. Harvard Working Paper in Linguistics 1: 91–127.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2002. Against optional and zero clitics: Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 56(1): 29–57.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2009. On a (Wh-)moved topic in Italian, compared to Germanic. In Advances in comparative Germanic syntax, eds. Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger, and Florian Schäfer, 3–40. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cecchetto, Carlo. 1997. Clitic right dislocation is not the mirror image of clitic left dislocation. Ms., Milan: DIPSCO.
Cecchetto, Carlo. 1999. A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in romance. Studia Linguistica 53: 40–67.
Chapallaz, Marguerite. 1979. The pronunciation of Italian. London: Bell & Hyman.
Chesi, Cristiano. 2007. An introduction to phase-based minimalist grammars: Why move is top-down from left-to-right. Studies in Linguistics CISCL Working Papers 1: 38–75.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structure. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiry: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka, and Samuel Jay Keyser, 89–155. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael J. Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Belletti 2004b, Vol. 3, 104–131.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory, eds. Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta. 133–166. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1976. Mica. Annali della Facolta di Lettere e Filosofia 1: 101–112 (reprinted in Cinque 1991).
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1982. Topic constructions in some European languages and connectedness. In Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text: Proceedings of the Tilburg conference held on 25 and 26 January 1982, eds. Konrad Ehlich and Henk van Riemsdijk, 7–41. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A’ dependencies. Cambridge: The MIT press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads; A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2002. Functional structure in DP and IP; The cartography of syntactic structures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo, and Luigi Rizzi. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, eds. Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, 51–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Citko, Barbara. 2014. Phase theory: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, Chris, and Paul M. Postal. 2014. Classical NEG raising: An essay on the syntax of negation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Collins, Peter. 2005. Exclamative clauses in English. Word 56: 1–17.
Cresti, Emanuela, and Valentina Firenzuoli. 1999. Illocution and intonational contours in Italian. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée IV(2): 77–98.
Cruschina, Silvio. 2009. The syntactic role of discourse-related features. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5: 15–30.
Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Discourse-related features and functional projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cuervo, Maria Cristina. 2003. Datives at large. Ph.D. diss., MIT.
Delancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity, the grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology I: 33–52.
Delancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 369–382.
Delfitto, Denis. 2013. Negation as a low scope-marker in German bevor-clauses. Lingue E Linguaggio 7(1): 73–88.
Delfitto, Denis, and Gaetano Fiorin. 2014. Negation in exclamatives. Studia Lingüística 68(3): 284–327.
Donati, Caterina. 2000. A note on negation in comparison. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica 10: 55–68.
Duffield, Nigel. 1995. Particles and projections in Irish syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ernout, Alfred, and Francois Thomas. 1953. Syntaxe Latine. Paris: Éditions Klicksieck.
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1997. Non-negative negation and Wh-exclamatives. In Negation and polarity; Syntax and semantics, eds. Danielle Forget, Paul Hirschbühler, France Martineau, and María Luisa Rivero, 75–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1992. Expletive negation and logical absorption. The Linguistic Review 9(4): 333–358.
Espinal, M. Teresa. 2000. Expletive negation, negative concord and feature checking. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 47–69.
Kiss, É. Katalin 2006. Event structure and the left periphery: Studies on Hungarian. Berlin: Springer.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1963. The position of embedding transformations in a grammar. Word 19: 208–231.
Featherston, Sam. 2001. Bridge verbs and V2 verbs: The same thing in spades? Ms., Tübingen University
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. In The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 2, ed. Norman Blake, 207–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frana, Ilaria, and Kyle Rawlins. 2015. Italian ‘mica’ in assertions and questions. In Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 20, eds. Nadine Bade, Polina Berezovskaya, and Anthea Scholler, 234–251. https://semanticsarchive.net/sub2015/BOOKLET_SuB_20.pdf.
Franco, Jon, and Susana Huidobro. 2008. Ethical datives, clitic doubling and the theory of pro. In Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic linguistics symposium, eds. Joyce Bruhn de Garavito and Elena Valenzuela, 215–224. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frascarelli, Mara, and Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topic in German and Italian. In On information structure, meaning and form, generalizations across languages, eds. Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, 87–116. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Gallego, Ángel J. 2010. Phase theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Gallego, Ángel J. 2012. Phases: Developing the framework. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gianollo, Chiara. 2016. The Latin system of negation at the syntax-semantics interface. RGG. Rivista Di Grammatica Generativa 38: 115–135.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1997. The landscape of polarity Items, PhD thesis, University of Groningen.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative... concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2011. Negative and positive polarity items: Licensing, compositionality and variation. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, eds. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 1660–1712. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Suwon Yoon. 2010. No NPI licensing in comparatives. In Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), eds. Timothy Grinsell, Adam Baker, Julia Thomas, Rebekah Baglini, and Jon Keane. Vol. 46. Available at https://www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/DRjZTRlN/GiannakidouYoonCLS46.pdf. Accessed 4 October 2019.
Goodall, Grant. 1987. Parallel structures in syntax: Coordination, causatives, and restructuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greco, Matteo. 2017. Surprise negation sentences: Expletive negation and the left periphery. PhD diss., Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele Milano – IUSS Pavia.
Greco, Matteo. 2019a. A twofold classification of expletive negation. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 36, eds. Richard Stockwell, Maura O’Leary, Zhongshi Xu, and Z. L. Zhou. Somerville: Cascadilla, 165–175.
Greco, Matteo. 2019b. Is expletive negation a unitary phenomenon? Lingue E Linguaggio 1: 25–58.
Greco, Matteo, and Andrea Moro. 2015a. Surprise negation (Sneg) sentences. Poster session presented at the Götttingen Summer School on Negation. Germany: University of Göttingen.
Greco, Matteo, and Andrea Moro. 2015b. Surprise negation and ethical dative. Poster session presented at the 41st IGG. Perugia: Università per Stranieri.
Grewendorf, Günther. 2002. Left dislocation as movement. In Georgetown university working papers in theoretical linguistics, eds. Simon Mauck and Jenny Mittelstaedt. Vol. 2, 31–81.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 279–326.
Guerzoni, Elena. 2004. Even-NPIs in yes/no questions. Natural Language Semantics 12: 319–343.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The syntax of negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2000. Negative preposing, negative inversion and the Split CP. In L. Horn and Y. Kato, eds., 2000.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2004. Topicalization, CLLD and the left periphery. In Proceedings of the dislocated elements workshop, eds. Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn. Vol. 35, 157–192. Berlin: ZAS Papers in Linguistics.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and the composition of the left periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haegeman, Liliane, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 1991. Negative heads and the Neg criterion. The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251.
Haegeman, Liliane, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 1996. Negative concord in West Flemish. In Parameters and functional heads, eds. Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi, 117–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. Questions in Montague grammar. Foundations of Language 10: 42–53.
Han, Chung-Hye. 1998. Deriving the interpretation of rhetorical questions. In West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 16, eds. Emily Curtis, James Lyle, and Gabriel Webster, 237–253. Stanford: CSLI.
Han, Chung-Hye. 2002. Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua 11: 201–229.
Hart, Johan, René Collier, and Antonie Cohen. 1990. A perceptual study of intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horn, Laurence R. 2010. The expression of negation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Horn, Laurence R., and Yasuhiko Kato. 2000. Negation and polarity, syntactic and semantic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Israel, Michael. 1997. The scalar model of polarity sensitivity: The case of the aspectual operators. In Negation and polarity: Syntax and semantics, eds. Danielle Forget, Paul Hirschbühler, France Martineau, and María Luisa Rivero, 209–229. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst.
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kayne, Richard Stanley. 1989a. Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In Dialect variation and the theory of grammar, ed. Paola Benincà, 85–103. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kayne, Richard Stanley. 1989b. Null subjects and clitic climbing. In The null subject parameter, eds. Jaeggli Osvaldo and Kenneth Safir, 239–269. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kayne, Richard Stanley. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, MIT Press.
Krifka, Manfred. 2010. How to interpret ‘expletive’ negation under bevor in German. In Language and logos: Festschrift for Peter Staudacher on his 70th birthday, eds. Thomas Hanneforth and Gisbert Fanselow, 214–236. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Ph.D. diss., MIT.
Lonzi, Lidia. 2004. Contrastive intonation and its disguises of syntactic structure in Italian. RGG. Rivista Di Grammatica Generativa 29: 125–148.
López, Luis. 2009. A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mayr, Clemens, and Viola Schmitt. 2017. Asymmetric coordination. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Makri, Maria-Margarita. 2013. Expletive negation beyond Romance: Clausal complementation and epistemic modality, MA thesis, University of York.
Mccloskey, James. 2001. The morphosyntax of Wh-extraction in Irish. Journal of Linguistics 37: 67–100.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. Why no(t). Ms., University of Chicago.
Michaelis, Laura Adrienne, and Knud Lambrecht. 1996. The exclamative sentence type in English. In Conceptual structure, discourse and language, ed. Adele Goldberg, 375–389. Stanford: CSLI.
Moro, Andrea. 2003. Notes on vocative case: A case study in clause structure. In Romance languages and linguistic theory 2001, eds. Josep Quer, Jan Schroten, Mauro Scorretti, Petra Sleeman, and Els Verheugd-Daatzelaar, 251–265. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Moro, Andrea. 2011. Clause structure folding and the “Wh-in-situ effect”. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 389–411.
Moscati, Vincenzo. 2010. Negation raising: Logical form and linguistic variation. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Muller, Claude. 1978. La negation expletive dans les constructions completives. Langue Française 39: 76–103.
Munn, Alann. 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures, Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.
Napoli, Donna Jo, and Marina Nespor. 1976. Negative in comparatives. Language 52: 811–838.
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2006. Special interrogatives—Left periphery, wh-doubling, and (apparently) optional elements. In Romance languages and linguistic theory 2004: Selected papers from going Romance 2004, eds. Jenny Doetjes and Paz González, 343–383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ouhalla, Jamal. 1990. Sentential negation, relativised minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. The Linguistic Review 7: 183–231.
Pesetsky, David. 1991. Zero syntax, Ms., MIT.
Poletto, Cecilia. 2005. Sì and E as CP expletives in Old Italian. In Grammaticalization and parametric variation, eds. Montserrat Batllori, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo, and Francesc Roca, 206–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poletto, Cecilia. 2006. Parallel phases: a study on the high and low left periphery of Old Italian. In Phases of interpretation, ed. Mara Frascarelli, 261–294. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Poletto, Cecilia, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 2013. Emphasis as reduplication: Evidence from sì che/noche sentences. Lingua 128: 124–141.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.
Portner, Paul, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 2000. The force of negation in Wh exclamatives and interrogatives. In L. Horn and Y. Kato, eds. 201–239. 2000.
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1994. Positive and negative polarity: a binding approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998. Structure for coordination: Part I and II. Glot International 3/7: 3–6 and 3/8, 3–9.
Progovac, Ljiljana. 2003. Structure for coordination. In The second glot international state-of-the-article book, eds. Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma, 241–287. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quer, Josep. 2002. Edging quantifiers: On QP fronting in Western Romance. In Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000, eds. Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen, and Paola Monachesi, 253–270. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Reese, Brian J. 2006. The meaning and use of negative polar interrogatives. In Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 6, eds. Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr, 331–354.
Renzi, Lorenzo, and Gianpaolo Salvi. 1991. Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. 2. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Rett, Jessica, and Sarah Murray. 2013. A semantic account of mirative evidentials. In Proceedings of SALT. Vol. 23, 453–472. Available at https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/article/view/2687/2432. Accessed 2 October 2019.
Richards, Marc D. 2011. Deriving the edge: What’s in a phase? Syntax 14(1): 74–95.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1981. Nominative marking in Italian infinitives and the nominative island constraint. In Binding and filtering, ed. Frank Heny, 129–158. London: Croom Helm.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, handbook of generative syntax, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position int(errogative) in the left periphery of the clause. In Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, eds. Gugliemo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004a. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, ed. Adriana Belletti. Vol. 3, 223–251. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004b. The structure of CP and IP; The cartography of syntactic structures. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2006a. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-movement: Moving on, eds. Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng and Norbert Corver, 97–133. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2006b. Phase theory and the privilege of the root. In Organizing grammar; Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, eds. Hans Broekhuis, Ursula Kleinhenz, Norbert Corver, and Jan Koster, 529–537. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Roberge, Yves, and Michelle Troberg. 2009. The high applicative syntax of the datives commodi/incommodi in Romance. Probus 21: 249–289.
Roberts, Ian. 2012. Phases, head movement and second-position effects. In Phases: Developing the framework, ed. Ángel J. Gallego, 385–440. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD diss., MIT.
Russi, Cinzia. 2008. Italian clitics: An empirical study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1974. Towards a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York–San Francisco–London: Academic Press.
Schmidt-Radefeldt, Jürgen. 1977. On so-called “rhetorical” questions. Journal of Pragmatics 1(4): 375–392.
Shlonsky, Ur. 2010. The cartographic enterprise in syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6): 417–429.
Sorianello, Patrizia. 2011. Aspetti pragmatici e prosodici dell’atto esclamativo. Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online 9: 287–332.
Speranza, J. L., and L. Laurence Horn. 2012. A brief history of negation. In Logic: A history of its central concepts, eds. Dov M. Gabbay, Francis Pelletier, and John Woods. Vol. 11, 127–174. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Taglicht, Josef. 1984. Message and emphasis: On focus and scope in English. London: Longman.
Totsuka, Masashi. 2013. On phase head in split CP hypothesis. English Linguistics 30: 204–215.
Tubau, Susagna, Viviane Déprez, Joan Borràs-Comes, and M. Teresa Espinal. 2017. How speakers interpret the negative markers no and no … pas in Catalan. Probus. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2017-0008.
van Der Wouden, Ton. 1994a. Negative contexts. Ph.D. diss., University of Groningen
van Der Wouden, Ton. 1994b. Polarity and illogical negation. In Dynamics, polarity, and quantification, eds. Makoto Kanazawa and Christopher J. Piñón, 17–45. Stanford: CSLI.
van Der Wouden, Ton. 1997. Negative contexts: collocation, polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics.
van Der Wurff, Wim. 1999. On expletive negation with adversative predicates in the history of English. In Negation in the history of English, eds. Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Gunnel Tottie Wim van der Wurff, 295–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
van Rooy, Robert. 2003. Negative polarity items in question: Strength as relevance. Journal of Semantics 20: 239–273.
Villalba, Xavier. 2004. Exclamatives and negation. Ms., Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Available at https://www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/2FkOWM1M/exclamatives&negation.pdf. Accessed 4 October 2019.
Wang, Xin. 2014. A cognitive pragmatic study of rhetorical questions. English Language and Literature Studies 4(1): 42–47.
Williams, Edwin. 1978. Across the board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.
Yoon, Suwon. 2008. Rhetorical comparatives: Polarity items, expletive negation, and subjunctive mood. Journal of Pragmatics 43(7): 2012–2033.
Yoon, Suwon. 2011. ‘Not’ in the mood: The syntax, semantics and pragmatics of evaluative negation. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1996. On the relevance of tense for sentential negation. In Parameters and functional heads, eds. Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi, 181–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and clausal structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2001. Sentential negation. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, eds. Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 511–535. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zanuttini, Raffaella, and Paul Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses at the syntax–semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39–81.
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Ph.D. diss., University of Amsterdam.
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2006. The ban on true negative imperatives. In Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, vol. 6, 405–424.
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2011. On the syntactically complex status of negative indefinites. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 14: 111–138.
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2017. Does NEG-raising involve NEG-raising? Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9461-0.
Acknowledgements
This article expands on observations first presented in both the poster sessions I participated at the Götttingen Summer School on Negation in the University of Göttingen (Greco and Moro 2015a) and at the 41st IGG in the Università per Stranieri di Perugia in 2015 (Greco and Moro 2015b), and the seminars I gave at the University of Pennsylvania (2016), at the Université de Genève (2016), at the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics in UCLA (2018) and at the Yale University (2018). Those ideas later flowed into my doctoral dissertation (Greco 2017). I am very grateful to those who attended those events and also to Adriana Belletti, Pier Marco Bertinetto, Cristiano Chesi, Denis Delfitto, Robert Frank, Laurence Horn, Andrea Moro, Massimo Piattelli Palmarini, Cecilia Poletto, Luigi Rizzi, Alessandra Tomaselli, Jim Wood, Raffaella Zanuttini and Hedde Zeijlstra for many helpful observations. Finally, I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their precious comments. Any resistance to their helpful suggestions is obviously mine!
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greco, M. On the syntax of surprise negation sentences: A case study on expletive negation. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 38, 775–825 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09459-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09459-6