Skip to main content
Log in

The Origin of Vowel Length Neutralization in Final Position: Evidence from Finnish Speakers

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a broad variety of languages with contrastive vowel length, long vowels are systematically excluded from a domain-final position, and are replaced with short vowels there. This is despite the fact that vowels at the end of a domain (utterance, phrase, word) are generally longer in duration than corresponding nonfinal vowels. We propose that the phonological pattern of final shortening arises diachronically from the effects of final devoicing – the breakdown in voicing at the end of an utterance. Partial devoicing of the final vowel makes it difficult to hear the end of the vowel and so favors identification of final vowels as short. If language learners generalize such an identification pattern, they have adopted a final shortening pattern. The claim that partially voiceless final vowels tend to be identified as short is supported by a series of experiments with Finnish speakers. The first two experiments establish that there is both final lengthening and final devoicing in the language. Three further experiments show that Finnish speakers identify the length category of partially voiceless final vowels on the basis of the duration of its voiced portion, so that partial devoicing of a vowel increases the probability of its being identified as short.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, Arthur. 1962. The Vowels and Tones of Standard Thai: Acoustical Measurements and Experiments, Publication 20, Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, Bloomington.

  • Abramson Arthur and Nianqi Ren. (1990). ‘Distinctive Vowel Length: Duration vs Spectrum in Thai’. Journal of Phonetics 18: 79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison Paul. (1999). Logistic Regression Using the SAS System: Theory and Application. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Aylett Matthew. (1999). ‘Stochastic Suprasegmentals: Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Structure and Syllabic Duration’. In: Ohala, J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D. and Bailey, A. (eds) Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp 289–292. Linguistics Department, University of California Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Batibo, Herman. 1985. Le Ke Sukuma (langue bantu de Tanzanie), Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations, Paris.

  • Beckman Mary and Jan Edwards (1994). ‘Articulatory Evidence for Differentiating Stress Categories’. In: Keating, P. (eds) Papers in Laboratory Phonology III, pp 7–33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman Mary and Shoji A. (1984). ‘Spectral and Perceptual Evidence for CV Coarticulation in Devoiced /si/ and /syu/ in Japanese’. Phonetica 41: 61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkovits Rochele. (1991). ‘The Effect of Speaking Rate on Evidence for Utterance-Final Lengthening’. Phonetica 48: 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore, Lee. 1989. Kinyambo Prosody, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.

  • Birkeland, Harris. 1952. Growth and Structure of the Egyptian Arabic Dialect, I Kommisjon hos Jacob Dybwad, Oslo.

  • Blevins Juliette (1997). ‘Rules in Optimality Theory: Two Case Studies’. In: Roca, I. (eds) Derivations and Constraints in Phonology, pp 227–260. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins Juliette and Andrew Garrett (1998). ‘The Origins of Consonant-Vowel Metathesis’. Language 74: 508–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blevins Juliette and Andrew Garrett (2004). ‘The Evolution of Metathesis’. In: Hayes, B., Kirchner, R. and Steriade, D. (eds) Phonetically Driven Phonology, pp 117–156. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley Eugene (1998). ‘Iambic Lengthening and Final Vowels’. International of American Linguistics 64: 179–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell Lyle (1974). ‘Theoretical Implications of Kekchi Phonology’. International Journal of American Linguistics 40: 269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Steve, Plauché Madelaine and John Ohala (2001). ‘Markedness and Consonant Confusion Asymmetries’. In: Hume, E. and Johnson, K. (eds) The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology, pp 79–101. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements G.N. (1986). ‘Compensatory Lengthening and Consonant Gemination in LuGanda’. In: Wetzels, L. and Sezer, E. (eds) Studies in Compensatory Lengthening, pp 39–77. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper William and Jeanne Paccia-Cooper (1980). Syntax and Speech. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter Geoffrey (1993). ‘Phrase-Level Prosody in ASL: Final Lengthening and Phrasal Contours’. In: Coulter, G. (eds) Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 3: Current Issues in ASL Phonology, pp 263–272. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell Mark (1964). A Reference Grammar of Syrian Arabic. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosswhite Katherine (2000). ‘Length Neutralization and Vowel Length in Orlec Cavakian’. In: King, T.H. and Sekerina, I. (eds) Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Philadelphia Meeting 1999, pp 152–167. Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushra Zawaydeh and Jong Kenneth (1999). ‘Stress, Duration and Intonation in Arabic Word-Level Prosody’. Journal of Phonetics 32: 3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delattre Pierre (1966). ‘A Comparison of Syllable Length Conditioning Among Languages’. International Review of Applied Linguistics 4: 183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson E.J. (1968). English Pronunciation 1500–1700. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolbey Andrew and Gunnar Hansson (1999). ‘The Source of Naturalness in Synchronic Phonology’. In: Billings, S., Boyle, J. and Griffith, A. (eds) CLS 35: Papers from the Main Session, pp Chicago–5969. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago: pp. 59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing Laura (1996). The Tonal Phonology of Jita. LINCOM Europa, München

    Google Scholar 

  • EdwardsJan Mary Beckman and Janet Fletcher (1991). ‘The Articulatory Kinematics of Final Lengthening’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89: 369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbert Samuel and Mary Pukui (1979). Hawaiian Grammar. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson Ben (1947). ‘Sierra Popoluca Syllable Structure’. International Journal of American Linguistics 13: 13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engstrand Olle (1987). ‘Durational Patterns of Lule Sami Phonology’. Phonetica 44: 117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans Nicholas (1995). A Grammar of Kayardild. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher Janet (1991). ‘Rhythm and Final Lengthening in French’. Journal of Phonetics 19: 193–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Fon Janice and Keith Johnson (2004). ‘Syllable Onset Intervals as an Indicator of Discourse and Syntactic Boundaries in Taiwan Mandarin’. Language and Speech 47: 57–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich Paul (1975). A Phonology of Tarascan, The University of Chicago Studies in Anthropology Series in Social, Cultural and Linguistic Anthropology, Vol. 4. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch Stefan, Pierrehumbert Janet and Michael Broe (2004). ‘Similarity Avoidance and the OCP’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 179–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki Hiroya, Nakamura Kimie and Toshiaki Imoto (1975). ‘Auditory Perception of Duration of Speech and Non-speech Stimuli’. In: Fant, G. and Tatham, M. (eds) Auditory Analysis and Perception of Speech, pp 197–219. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Matthew (2003). ‘The Phonology of Pitch Accents in Chickasaw’. Phonology 20: 173–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenke Ulrich (1972). Grundzüge der Struktur des Finnischen. Verlag Cristoph von der Ropp, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion Susan (1998). ‘The Role of Perception in the Sound Change of Velar Palatalization’. Phonetica 55: 18–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie Malcolm (1948). Bantu Word Division: A New Study of an Old Problem, International African Institute Memorandum 22. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard Mark (1978). ‘The Devoicing of Voiced Fricatives’. Journal of Phonetics 6: 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes Bruce (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes Bruce and Donca Steriade (2004). ‘Introduction: The Phonetic Bases of Phonological Markedness’. In: Hayes, B., Kirchner, R. and Steriade, D. (eds) Phonetically Based Phonology, pp 1–33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho Aichen (1977). ‘Intonation Variation in a Mandarin Sentence for Three Interrogative, Exclamatory and Declarative’. Phonetica 34: 446–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock Hans Heinrich (1986). ‘Compensatory Lengthening: In Defense of the Concept “Mora”’. Folia Linguistica 20: 431–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey Beth Ann and Zsuzsanna Fagyal (1999). ‘Phonemic Vowel Length and Pre-Boundary Lengthening: An Experimental Investigation on the Use of Durational Cues in Hungarian’. In: Ohala, J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D. and Bailey, A. (eds) Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp 313–316. Linguistics Department, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton A.E. (1949). A Grammar of Luvale. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman Larry (1976). ‘Phonologization’. In: Juillard, A. (eds) Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg, Vol. 2, pp 407–418. Anma Libri, Saratoga

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman Larry and Francis Katamba (1990). ‘Final Vowel Shortening in Luganda’. Studies in African Linguistics 21: 1–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kálmán Béla (1972). ‘Hungarian Historical Phonology’. In: Benkó, L. and Imre, S. (eds) The Hungarian Language, pp 49–83. Mouton, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson Fred (1999). Finnish: An Essential Grammar. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavitskaya Darya (2002). Compensatory Lengthening: Phonetics, Phonology, Diachrony. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz Michael (1970). ‘On the Notation of Vowel Length in Lithuanian’. Papers in Linguistics 3: 73–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyser S.J. and Paul Kiparsky (1984). ‘Syllable Structure in Finnish Phonology’. In: Aronoff, M. and Oehrle, R. (eds) Language Sound Structure, pp 7–31. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimenyi Alexandre (1979). Studies in Kinyarwanda and Bantu Phonology. Linguistic Research Inc., Carbondale

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisseberth Charles and Mohammad Abasheikh (1974). ‘Vowel Length in Chi-Mwi:ni – A Case Study of the Role of Grammar in Phonology’. In: Bruck, A., Fox, R. and LaGaly, M. (eds) Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, pp 193–209. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt Dennis (1975). ‘Vowel Lengthening is Syntactically Determined in a Connected Discourse’. Journal of Phonetics 3: 129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt Dennis (1976). ‘Linguistic Uses of Segment Duration in English: Acoustic and Perceptual Evidence’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59: 1208–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubozono Haruo (2002). ‘Temporal Neutralization in Japanese’. In: Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N. (eds) Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 7, pp 171–201. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen Jaakko (1970). Aspects of Quantity in Standard Finnish. Jyväskyllä University Press, Jyväskyllä

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightner Theodore (1972). Problems in the Theory of Phonology, Vol. 1, Russian and Turkish Phonology. Linguistic Research, Inc., Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Björn. 1968. ‘Temporal Organization of Syllable Production’, Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report 2–3, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, pp. 1–6.

  • Lindblom Björn (1983). ‘Economy of Speech Gestures’. In: MacNeilage, P. (eds) The Production of Speech, pp 217–245. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom Björn (1986). ‘Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems’. In: Ohala, J. and Jaeger, J. (eds) Experimental Phonology, pp 13–44. Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom Björn (1990). ‘Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory’. In: Hardcastle, W. and Marchal, A. (eds) Speech Production and Speech Modelling, pp 403–439. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom Björn, Guion Susan, Hura Susan, Moon Seung-Jae and Willerman Raquel (1994). ‘Is Sound Change Adaptive?’. Rivista di Linguistica 7: 5–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom Björn, Lyberg Bertil and Karin Holmgren (1981). Durational Patterns of Swedish Phonology: Do They Reflect Short-Term Memory Processes?. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom Björn and Michael Studdert-Kennedy (1967). ‘On the Role of Formant Transitions in Vowel Recognition’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42: 830–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloret Maria-Rosa (1997). ‘Oromo Phonology’. In: Kaye, A.S. (eds) Phonologies of Asia and Africa, pp 493–519. Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi Linda and John McCarthy (1991). ‘Prosodic Circumscription in Choctaw Morphology’. Phonology 8: 37–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddieson Ian (1985). ‘Phonetic Cues to Syllabification’. In: Fromkin, V. (eds) Phonetic Linguistics, pp 203–222. Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann Virginia and Bruno Repp (1980). ‘Influence of Vocalic Context on Perception of the [S]-[s] Distinction’. Perception and Psychophysics 28: 213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy John and Alan Prince (1999). ‘Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology’. In: Kager, R. and Zonneveld, W. (eds) The Prosody–Morphology Interface, pp 218–309. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarus Ernest (1997). ‘Kurdish phonology’. In: Kaye, A.S. (eds) Phonologies of Asia and Africa, pp 691–706. Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeussen A.E. (1979). ‘Vowel Length in Proto-Bantu’. Journal of African and Linguistics 1: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelson Karin (1988). A Comparative Study of Lake-Iroquoian Accent. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke Jeff (2003). ‘The Interplay of Speech Perception and Phonology: Experimental Evidence from Turkish’. Phonetica 60: 208–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montreuil Jean-Pierre (1995). ‘Coda Weight and Vowel Length in Quebec French’. In: Amastae, J., Goodall, G., Montalbetti, M. and Phinney, M. (eds) Contemporary Research in Romance Linguistics, pp 25–36. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers Scott (2003). ‘F0 Timing in Kinyarwanda’. Phonetica 60: 71–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers Scott (2005). ‘Vowel Duration and Neutralization of Vowel Length Contrasts in Kinyarwanda’. Journal of Phonetics 33: 427–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Scott and Benjamin B. Hansen. To appear. ‘The Origin of Vowel Length Neutralization in Vocoid Sequences’, Phonology.

  • Nagano-Madsen Yasuko (1992). Mora and Prosodic Coordination: A Phonetic Study of Japanese, Eskimo and Yoruba. Lund University Press, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman Stanley (1965). Zuni Grammar. The University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom S.G. and Doodeman G. (1980). ‘Production and Perception of Vowel Length in Spoken Sentences’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67: 276–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odden David (1996). The Phonology and Morphology of Kimatuumbi. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Odden David and Mary Odden (1999). ‘Kihehe Syllable Structure’. In: Ritter, N. (eds) The Syllable: Views and Facts, pp 417–445. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden Richard (2001). ‘Turn Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction’. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31: 139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, Richard. 2002. ‘Creaky Voice and Turn-Taking in Finnish’, Handout for talk at Colloquium of the British Association of Academic Phoneticians, Available at http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~rao1/talks.html.

  • Ohala John (1981). ‘The Listener as a Source of Sound Change’. In: Masek, C., Hendrick, R. and Miller, M. (eds) Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, pp 178–203. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala John (1983). ‘The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints’. In: MacNeilage, P. (eds) The Production of Speech, pp 189–216. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala John (1990). ‘The Phonetics and Phonology of Aspects of Assimilation’. In: Kingston, J. and Beckman, M. (eds) Papers in Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 1, pp 258–275. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala John (1993). ‘The Phonetics of Sound Change’. In: Jones, C. (eds) Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, pp 237–278. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Oller, David. 1971. The Duration of Speech Segments: The Effect of Position-in-Utterance and Word-Length, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

  • Oller David (1973). ‘The Effect of Position in Utterance on Speech Segment Duration in English’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54: 1235–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oller David (1979). ‘Syllable Timing in Spanish, English and Finnish’. In: Hollien, H. and Hollien, P. (eds) Current Issues in the Phonetic Sciences, pp 331–343. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Oller David and Bruce Smith (1977). ‘Effect of Final Syllable Position on Vowel Duration in Infant Babbling’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62: 994–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer F.R. (1962). The Morphology of the Tigre Noun. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng Shu-Hui (1997). ‘Production and Perception of Taiwanese Tones in Different Tonal and Phrasal Contexts’. Journal of Phonetics 25: 371–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson Gordon and Ilse Lehiste (1960). ‘Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32: 693–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polak-Bynon Louise (1975). A Shi Grammar. Musée Royal de l′Afrique Centrale, Tervuren

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto-Vives, Pilar. 1994. Vowel Lengthening in Northern Italy: A Case for Segmental and Prosodic Optimization, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana.

  • Rauschuber, Brianna. 2005. ‘Degenerate Feet and Minimum Word Requirements in Iquito’, Handout for talk at the University of Texas, Austin.

  • Rietveld Toni, Kerkhoff J. and Carlos Gussenhoven (2004). ‘Word Prosodic Structure and Vowel Duration in Dutch’. Journal of Phonetics 32: 349–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton Dean (1963). ‘Papago Phonemes’. International Journal of American 29: 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter Paul and Fe T Otanes (1972). Tagalog Reference Grammar. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • ScobbieJames Alice Turk and Nigel Hewlett (1999). ‘Morphemes, Phonetics and Lexical Items: The Case of the Scottish Vowel Length Rule’. In: Ohala, J., Ohala, M., Granville, D. and Bailey, A. (eds) Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp 1617–1620. Linguistics Department, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadle Christine (1997). ‘The Aerodynamics of Speech’. In: Hardcastle, W. and Laver, J. (eds) The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, pp 33–64. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen Xionan (1993). ‘The Use of Prosody in Disambiguation in Mandarin’. Phonetica 50: 261–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman Kim and Janet Pierrehumbert (1990). ‘The Timing of Prenuclear High Accents in English’. In: Kingston, J. and Beckman, M. (eds) Papers in Laboratory Phonology I, pp 72–106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Caroline (1999). ‘Marking the Boundary: Utterance-Final Prosody in French Questions and Statements’. In: Ohala, J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D. and Bailey, A. (eds) Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp 1181–1184. Linguistics Department University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Caroline (2003). ‘Vowel Devoicing in Contemporary French’. French Language Studies 13: 177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn H. (1975). Woleaian Reference Grammar. The University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade Donca (2001). ‘Directional Asymmetries in Place Assimilation: A Perceptual Account’. In: Hume, E. and Johnson, K. (eds) The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology, pp 219–250. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell Robert and Donald Bowen J. (1965). The Sounds of English and Spanish. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe William (1978). Sign Language Structure (revised edition). Linstok Press, Silver Spring, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter Lynn (1978). ‘Acoustic Determinants of Phrase Boundary Perception’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64: 1582–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suomi Kari and Riikka Ylitalo (2004). ‘On Durational Correlates of Word Stress in Finnish’. Journal of Phonetics 32: 35–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trubetzkoy N.S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux de Cercle Linguistique de Prague 7, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk Alice (1999). ‘Structural Influences on Boundary-Related Lengthening in English’. In: Ohala, J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D. and Bailey, A. (eds) Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp 237–240. Linguistics Department, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Umeda Noriko (1975). ‘Vowel Duration in American English’. Journal of the Society of America 58: 434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbanczyk, Suzanne. 1996. Patterns of Reduplication in Lushootseed, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, distributed by the GLSA, Amherst.

  • Urua Eno-Abasi (1999). ‘Length and Syllable Weight in Ibibio’. Studies in African Linguistics 28: 241–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariapaola D’Imperio and Santen Jan (1999). ‘Positional Effects on Stressed Vowel Duration in Standard Italian’. In: Ohala, J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D. and Bailey, A. (eds) Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp 241–244. Linguistics Department University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson Janet (1999). ‘The Syllable and Syllabification in Modern Spoken Arabic (Sancani and Cairene)’. In: Ritter, N. (eds) The Syllable: Views and Facts, pp 501–525. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells J.C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley W.H. (1966). A Study of Yao Sentences. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman Colin, Shattuck-Hufnagel Stephanie, Ostendorf Mari and Patti Price (1992). ‘Segmental Durations in the Vicinity of Prosodic Phrase Boundaries’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 1707–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Myers.

Additional information

We would like to thank the many people who helped us learn about Finnish: Arto Anttila, Juha Poutiainen, Satu Ollikainen, Benita Heiskanen, Suvi Simila, Kristiina Rosser, Jenny Söderman, Helena Tiainen, Asta and Kari Leppänen, and the wonderful people of the Finnish Language School of North Texas. Thanks also to Melissa Redford, Megan Crowhurst, Mark Myers, Randy Diehl, Nancy Heger, Michael Kenstowicz, and two anonymous NLLT reviewers. This work has been funded by grant BCS-0345649 from the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, S., Hansen, B.B. The Origin of Vowel Length Neutralization in Final Position: Evidence from Finnish Speakers. Nat Language Linguistic Theory 25, 157–193 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-0001-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-0001-7

Keywords

Navigation