Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Difference Between the Profiles Presented by Yeasts that Colonize the Vaginal Mucosa or Cause Primary or Recurrent Candidiasis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Candida yeasts are the most frequent in the vaginal content. This yeast may be a normal microbiota but also causes candidiasis. In symptomatic cases, primary candidiasis (VVC) or recurrence (RVVC) can be considered. This study aims to compare the frequency and in vitro sensitivity profile of Candida species isolated in the vaginal content with the different stages of the presence of yeasts. A total of 258 non-pregnant patients with/without VVC were prospectively screened at a teaching Health Centre of the Faculty of Medicine, in the University of Sao Paulo. The vaginal isolates were identified by traditional and molecular methods. Yeasts were isolated in 160 women. 34% were asymptomatic, 34% with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and 32% recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC). C. albicans was the most frequent species with 50.1% (82/160), followed by C. parapsilosis 13.7%(22/160), C. glabrata 12.5% (20/160), and C. tropicalis (6.2%). Analysis by the group showed that, in the asymptomatic group, eight yeast species were isolated, C. albicans 44.5% (24/54), C. glabrata 20% (11/54), C. parapsilosis and Rhodotorula rubra being the most frequent. In the VVC group, 11 yeast species were identified. Most isolates were C. albicans 68.5% (37/54), C. tropicalis 7.5% (4/54), and C. parapsilosis 5.5% (3/54). In the RVVC group, ten species were identified, the most frequent being C. albicans 38.5% (20/52), C. parapsilosis 17% (9/52), C. glabrata 4% (8/52), and C. tropicalis 6% (3/52). Less frequent species, such as C. haemulonii and Trichosporon spp, were isolated in the VVC and RVVC groups, C. kefyr was isolated in the three groups studied, and Rhodotorula spp was isolated in the control and RVVC groups. Candida metapsilosis was present in two isolates from the RVVC group. Most isolates were considered sensitive to the tested antifungals. Less sensitivity was seen for caspofungin. In this study, we were able to verify that the most common species of yeasts found in vaginal secretion were isolated in the three groups studied; however, there was the diversity of species in VVC and RVVC. Cryptic species C. haemulonii and were isolated in symptomatic patients. High levels of MICs, some of the antifungals tested, in the control group, draw attention in the group of asymptomatic women. We would like to emphasize that this research aims to assist clinicians and gynecologists, as well as assist in the epidemiological studies of candidiasis, in our country, how to draw attention to the profile of sensitivity/resistance to antifungals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Schuster MG, Vazquez JA, Walsh TJ, Zaoutis TE, Sobel JD. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(4):e1-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beigi RH, Meyn LA, Moore DM, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Vaginal yeast colonization in non-pregnant women: a longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:926–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guzel AB, Ilkit M, Burgut R, Urunsak IF, Ozgunen FT. An evaluation of risk factors in pregnant women with Candida vaginitis and the diagnostic value of simultaneous vaginal and rectal sampling. Mycopathologia. 2011;172(1):25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonçalves B, Ferreira C, Alves CT, Henriques M, Azeredo J, Silva S. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: Epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2016;42(6):905–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan SR, Liao QP, Liu XP, Liu ZH, Zang D. Vaginal allergic response in women with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;101(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Achkar JM, Fries BC. Candida infections of the genitourinary tract. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(2):253–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blostein F, Levin-Sparenberg E, Wagner J, Foxman B. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Ann Epidemiol. 2017;27(9):575–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pirotta MV, Suzanne MG. Genital Candida species detected in samples from women in Melbourne, Australia, before and after treatment with antibiotics. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(9):3213–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fontecha G, Montes K, Ortiz B, Galindo C, Braham S. Identification of cryptic species of four Candida complexes in a culture collection. J Fungi (Basel). 2019;5(4):117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dannaoui E, Espinel-Ingroff A. Antifungal susceptibly testing by concentration gradient strip etest method for fungal isolates: a review. J Fungi. 2019;5:108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T. The yeasts, a taxonomic study, 5th. Burllington: Elsevier; 2011. p. 2354.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mannarelli BM, Kurtzman CP. Rapid identification of Candida albicans and other human pathogenic yeasts by using short oligonucleotides in a PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1634–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Den Ende AHGG, de Hoog GS. Variability and molecular diagnostics of the neurotropic species Cladophialophora bantiana. Stud Mycol. 1999;43:151–216.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merseguel KB, Nishikaku AS, Rodrigues AM, Padovan AC, Ferreira RC, Azevedo Melo AS, Briones MR, Colombo AL. Genetic diversity of medically important and emerging Candida species causing invasive infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;13:15–57.

    Google Scholar 

  15. White TJ, Bruns S, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods applications. New York: Academic Press Inc; 1990. p. 315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2017 [1st Edition, M60].

  17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2002 [Approved Standard, Second edition, M27-A2].

  18. Yano J, Sobel JD, Nyirjesv P, Sobel R, Williams VL, Yu Q, Noverr MC, Fidel PL Jr. Current patient perspectives of vulvovaginal candidiasis: incidence, symptoms, management and post-treatment outcomes. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kantarcioglu AS, Ÿucel A. Phospholipase and protease activities in clinical Candida isolates with reference to the sources of strains. Mycoses. 2002;45:160–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Landers DV, Wiesenfeld HC, Heine RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of lower genital tract infection in women. Am J Obst Gynecol. 2004;190:1004–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moreira D, Paula CR. Vulvovaginal candidiasis. Int J Gynec Obst. 2006;92:266–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Amouri I, Sellami H, Borji N, Abbes S, Sellami A, Cheikhrouhou F, Maazoun L, Khaled S, Khrouf S, Boujelben Y, Ayadi A. Epidemiological survey of vulvovaginal candidosis in Sfax. Tunisia Mycoses. 2011;54(5):e499-505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chatzivasileiou P, Vyzantiadi TA. Vaginal yeast colonisation: from a potential harmless condition to clinical implications and management approaches—a literature review. Mycoses. 2019;62(8):638–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Denning DW, Kneale M, Sobel JD, Rautemaa-Richardson R. Global burden of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(11):e339–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cassone A. Vulvovaginal Candida albicans infections: pathogenesis, immunity and vaccine prospects. BJOG Int J Obst Gynaecol. 2015;122(6):785–94.

  26. Hashemi SE, et al. Species distribution and susceptibility profiles of Candida species isolated from vulvovaginal candidiasis, emergence of C. lusitaniae. Curr Med Mycol. 2019;5(4):26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Holland J, Young ML, Lee O, Chen SCA. Vulvovaginal carriage of yeasts others than Candida albicans. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79:249–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lockhart SR, Messer SA, Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Geographic distribution and antifungal susceptibility of the newly described species Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis in comparison to the closely related species Candida parapsilosis. J Clin Microb. 2008;46:2659–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tavanti A, Davidson AD, Gow NAR, Maiden MCJ, Odds FC. Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis Groups II and III. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(1):284–292.

  30. Arastehfar A, Khodavaisy S, Daneshnia F, Najafzadeh MJ, Mahmoudi S, Charsizadeh A, Salehi MR, Zarrinfar H, Raeisabadi A, Dolatabadi S, Zare Shahrabadi Z, Zomorodian K, Pan W, Hagen F, Boekhout T. Molecular identification, genotypic diversity, antifungal susceptibility, and clinical outcomes of infections caused by clinically underrated yeasts, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis: an Iranian multicenter study (2014–2019). Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;30:264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu Y, Shan Y, Fan S, Li J, Liu X. Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto and the closely related species Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis in Vulvovaginal Candidiasis. Mycopathologia. 2015;179(1–2):111–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kasper, L, Katja S, Bernhard H. Intracellular survival of Candida glabrata in macrophages: immune evasion and persistence. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15(5): fov042.

  33. de Almeida JN, et al. Candida haemulonii complex species, Brazil, January 2010–March 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(3):561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fontecha G, et al. Identification of cryptic species of four Candida complexes in a culture collection. J Fungi. 2019;5(4):117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Boatto HF, Cavalcanti SDB, Del Negro GMB, Girão MJBC, Francisco EC, Ishida K, Gompertz OF. Candida duobushaemulonii: an emerging rare pathogenic yeast isolated from recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016;111:407–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Muñoz JF, Gade L, Chow NA, Loparev VN, Juieng P, Berkow EL, Farrer RA, Litvinteseva AP, Cuom CA. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kathuria S, et al. Multidrug-resistant Candida auris misidentified as Candida haemulonii: characterization by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry and DNA sequencing and its antifungal susceptibility profile variability by Vitek 2, CLSI broth microdilution, and Etest method. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(6):1823–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mendling W, Brasch J. Guideline vulvovaginal candidosis (2010) of the german society for gynecology and obstetrics, the working group for infections and infectimmunology in gynecology and obstetrics, the german society of dermatology, the board of german dermatologists and the german speaking mycological society. Mycoses. 2012;55(1–13):42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments by the authors to the São Paulo State Research Support Foundation—FAPESP: 2008/58830-0 and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, for a doctoral scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (USP), Av. Lineu Prestes, 2.227, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil

    D. Moreira, R. T. B. Ramos, V. T. Costa & C. R. Paula

  2. Section of Mycology, Institute Adolfo Lutz (IAL), CLR II Bauru, Rua Rubens Arruda, s/n, Bauru, SP, Brazil

    L. S. Ruiz & B. R. Lara

  3. Mycology Laboratory Investigation, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Av. Fernando Corrêa da Costa, 2.367, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil

    D. P. Leite-Jr

  4. Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Western Center of Paraná (UNICENTRO), Campus CEDETEG, Alameda Elio Antonio Dalla Vecchia, Guarapuava, PR, 838, Brazil

    M. E. Auler

  5. Institute of Biosciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), R. Prof. Dr. Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, Botucatu, SP, 250, Brazil

    B. R. Lara

  6. Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringa (UEM), Av. Mandacaru, 1.550, Maringá, PR, Brazil

    A. Gasparetto

  7. University Hospital - State University of West Paraná, Av. Tancredo Neves, 3.220, Cascavel, PR, Brazil

    R. F. Gandra

  8. Section of Mycology, Instituto Adolfo Lutz- Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 355 - Pacaembu, São Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil

    M. S. C. Melhem

Authors
  1. D. Moreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. S. Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. P. Leite-Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. E. Auler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. T. B. Ramos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. V. T. Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. B. R. Lara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. Gasparetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. R. F. Gandra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. M. S. C. Melhem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. C. R. Paula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. R. Paula.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling Editor: Anamelia Lorenzetti Bocca

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreira, D., Ruiz, L.S., Leite-Jr, D.P. et al. Difference Between the Profiles Presented by Yeasts that Colonize the Vaginal Mucosa or Cause Primary or Recurrent Candidiasis. Mycopathologia 186, 411–421 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-021-00556-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-021-00556-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation