Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization methods of video images processing for mobile object recognition

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recognition of moving objects in video images is mainly based on acquiring the target information in a certain time series. After image processing, relevant algorithms are used to get the internal features and effectively identify the target object. However, image background, noise, definition and other factors will have impacts on mobile object recognition. Therefore, the mobile objects in video images are more complicated than the static objects in the fixed images. The traditional convolutional neural network (CNN) uses gradient descent algorithm for learning and training, and uses gradient descent algorithm to determine the initial thresholds, weights, which may cause the training to fall into a local optimal state. Therefore, this paper proposes an improved adaptive genetic algorithm combined with CNN. The thresholds and weights of CNN can be optimized by using adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA), which can overcome the shortcomings of the original genetic algorithm such as slow convergence. Experimental results shows that the recognition accuracy rate of the experiment increased from 83.75% to 92%, the method can effectively improve the accuracy and efficiency of mobile object recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cao Y, Chen Y, Khosla D (2015) Spiking deep convolutional neural networks for energy-efficient object recognition[J]. Int J Comput Vis 113(1):54–66

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao Y, Li P, Zhang Y (2018) Parallel processing algorithm for railway signal fault diagnosis data b7ased on cloud computing [J]. Futur Gener Comput Syst 88:594–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao Y, Zhang Y, Wen T, Li P Research on dynamic nonlinear input prediction of fault diagnosis based on fractional differential operator equation in high-speed train control system.[J]. Chaos. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5085397

  4. Cao Y, Ma L, Zhang Y Application of fuzzy predictive control technology in automatic train operation[J]. Clust Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2258-0

  5. Ghamisi P, Chen Y, Zhu X (2016) A self-improving convolution neural network for the classification of hyperspectral data[J]. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 13(10):1537–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ijjina EP, Mohan CK (2016) Human action recognition using genetic algorithms and convolutional neural networks[J]. Pattern Recognit J Pattern Recognit Soc 59:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JS, Yeom DH, Joo YH (2011) Fast and robust algorithm of tracking multiple moving objects for intelligent video surveillance systems[J]. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 57(3):1165–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li P, Li RX, Cao Y, Xie G (2018) Storage aided system property enhancing and hybrid robust smoothing for large-scale PV systems[J]. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 6(8):2871–2879

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muralitharan K, Sakthivel R, Vishnuvarthan R (2018) Neural network based optimization approach for energy demand prediction in smart grid[J]. Neurocomputing 273:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qi T, Xu Y, Quan Y et al (2017) Image-based action recognition using hint-enhanced deep neural networks[J]. Neurocomputing 267:475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rikhtegar A, Pooyan M, Manzuri-Shalmani MT (2016) Genetic algorithm-optimised structure of convolutional neural network for face recognition applications[J]. IET Comput Vis 10(6):559–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanap VA, Kadu MB, Labade RP (2015) Survey on moving object detection. Int J Modern Trends Eng Res 2(11):285–289

    Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivas M, Patnaik LM (1994) Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms[J]. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(4):656–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Teng X (2014) The application of image processing Technology in the Intelligent Transportation System[J]. Appl Mech Mater 3082(1090):2678–2680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ünal M, Onat M, Bal A (2010) Cellular neural network training by ant colony optimization algorithm[C]. Signal Process Commun Appl Conf IEEE 2010:471–474

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waris MA, Iosifidis A, Gabbouj M (2017) CNN-based edge filtering for object proposals[J]. Neurocomputing 266:631–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu H, Bie R, Guo J et al (2017) CNN refinement based object recognition through optimized segmentation[J]. Optik Int J Light Electron Opt 150:76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xie G, Zhang X, Yang W et al (2017) LG-CNN: from local parts to global discrimination for fine-grained recognition[J]. Pattern Recogn 71:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu Y, Shan S, Qiu Z et al (2018) End-to-end subtitle detection and recognition for videos in east Asian languages via CNN ensemble[J]. Signal Process Image Commun Publ Eur Assoc Signal Process 60:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yazdi M, Bouwmans T (2018) New trends on moving object detection in video images captured by a moving camera: a survey[J]. Comput Sci Rev 28:157–177

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Cao Y, Wen Y, Liang L, Zou F (2018) Optimization of information interaction protocols in cooperative vehicle-infrastructure systems[J]. Chin J Electron 27(2):439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the fundamental research funds for the central universities (2015XKMS087).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuo Xiao.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, S., Li, T. & Wang, J. Optimization methods of video images processing for mobile object recognition. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 17245–17255 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7423-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7423-9

Keywords

Navigation