Skip to main content
Log in

Copy-move forgery detection based on multifractals

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital images and video are the basic media for communication nowadays. They are used as authenticated proofs or corroboratory evidence in different areas like: forensic studies, law enforcement, journalism and others. With development of software for editing digital images, it has become very easy to change image content, add or remove important information or even to make one image combining multiple images. Thus, the development of methods for such change detection has become very important. One of the most common methods is copy-move forgery detection (CMFD). Methods of this type include change detection that occur by copying a part of an image and pasting it to another location within the image. We propose new method for detection of such changes using certain multifractal parameters as characteristic features, as well as common statistical parameters. Before the analysis, images are divided into non-overlapping blocks of fixed dimensions. For each block, the characteristic features are calculated. In order to classify observed blocks, we used metaheuristic method and proposed new semi-metric function for similarity analysis between blocks. Simulation shows that the proposed method provides good results in terms of precision and recall, with low computational complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alahmadi A, Hussain M, Aboalsamh H, Muhammad G, Bebis G, Mathkour H (2017) Passive detection of image forgery using DCT and local binary pattern. SIViP 11(1):81–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-016-0899-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alkawaz MH, Sulong G, Saba T, Rehman A (2016) Detection of copy-move image forgery based on discrete cosine transform. Neural Comput & Applic:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2663-3

  3. Bi X, Pun CM (2018) Fast copy-move forgery detection using local bidirectional coherency error refinement. Pattern Recogn 81:161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.03.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bi X, Pun CM, Yuan XC (2016) Multi-level dense descriptor and hierarchical feature matching for copy–move forgery detection. Inf Sci 345:226–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bi X, Pun CM, Yuan XC (2018) Multi-scale feature extraction and adaptive matching for copy-move forgery detection. Multimed Tools Appl 77(1):363–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-4276-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chou CL, Lee JC (2017) Copy-Move Forgery Detection Based on Local Gabor Wavelets Patterns. In: International Conference on Security with Intelligent Computing and Big-data Services (pp. 47-56). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76451-1_5

  7. CoMoFoD database, available at: http://www.vcl.fer.hr/comofod. Accessed March 2018

  8. Emam M, Han Q, Niu X (2016) PCET based copy-move forgery detection in images under geometric transforms. Multimed Tools Appl 75(18):11513–11527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2872-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gan Y, Chung J, Young J, Hu Z, Zhao J (2018) A Duplicated Forgery Detection Fusion Algorithm using SIFT and Radial-Harmonic Fourier Moments. International Journal of Performability Engineering 14(1):111. https://doi.org/10.23940/ijpe.18.01.p12.111120

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gan Y, Zhong J (2016) Application of AFMT method for composite forgery detection. Nonlinear Dynamics 84(1):341–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2524-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Glisovic N, Davidovic T, Bojovic N, Kenzevic N Statistical and Mathematical Methods for Solving the Problem of Clustering of Station Data When Data Is Incomplete, Conference: XXXV Symposium on New Technologies in Postal and Telecommunication Vehicles, PosTel 2017. Traffic Faculty, Belgrade

  12. Glisovic N, Davidovic T, Raskovic M (2017) Clustering when missing data by using the variable neighborhood search, (in serbian). In: Proc. SYM-OP-IS 2017, pages 158-163, Zlatibor

  13. Gong J, Guo J (2016) Image copy-move forgery detection using SURF in opponent color space. Transactions of Tianjin University 22(2):151–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-016-2705-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo Y, Cao X, Zhang W, Wang R (2018) Fake Colorized Image Detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 13(8):1932–1944. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2018.2806926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayat K, Qazi T (2017) Forgery detection in digital images via discrete wavelet and discrete cosine transforms. Comput Electr Eng 62:448–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Image Manipulation Dataset, available at: https://www5.cs.fau.de/research/data/image-manipulation/. Accessed April 2018

  17. Jenadeleh M, Ebrahimi Moghaddam M (2016) Blind detection of region duplication forgery using fractal coding and feature matching. J Forensic Sci 61(3):623–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaushik R, Bajaj RK, Mathew J (2015) On image forgery detection using two dimensional discrete cosine transform and statistical moments. Procedia Computer Science 70:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.10.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JC, Chang CP, Chen WK (2015) Detection of copy–move image forgery using histogram of orientated gradients. Inf Sci 321:250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin CS, Tsay JJ (2016) Passive forgery detection using discrete cosine transform coefficient analysis in JPEG compressed images. Journal of Electronic Imaging 25(3):033010. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.25.3.033010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahmood T, Mehmood Z, Shah M, Saba T (2018) A robust technique for copy-move forgery detection and localization in digital images via stationary wavelet and discrete cosine transform. J Vis Commun Image Represent 53:202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2018.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malviya AV, Ladhake SA (2016) Pixel based image forensic technique for copy-move forgery detection using auto color correlogram. Procedia Computer Science 79:383–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.03.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mladenović N, Hansen P (1997) Variable neighborhood search. Comput Oper Res 24(11):1097–1100

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Mladenović N, Sörensen K, Souza M (eds) (2018) Special issue on “Advances in Variable Neighborhood Search”. Int Trans Oper Res 25(1):427–427

  25. Mohsen J, Mohsen E-M (2016) Blind Detection of Region Duplication Forgery Using Fractal Coding and Feature Matching. J Forensic Sci 61(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13108

  26. Oommen RS, Jayamohan M, Sruthy S (2016) Using Fractal Dimension and Singular Values for Image Forgery Detection and Localization. Procedia Technology 24:1452–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reljin I, Reljin B, Pavlovic I, Rakočevic I (2000). Multifractal analysis of gray-scale images. In: Electrotechnical Conference, 2000. MELECON 2000. 10th Mediterranean (Vol. 2, pp. 490-493). IEEE

  28. Shih FY, Jackson JK (2015) Copy-Cover Image Forgery Detection in Parallel Processing. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 29(08):1554004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021800141554004X

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Soni B, Das PK, Thounaojam DM (2018) Dual System for Copy-move Forgery Detection using Block-based LBP-HF and FWHT Features. Eng Lett 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2010.2051666

  30. Ustubioglu B, Ulutas G, Ulutas M, Nabiyev VV (2016) A new copy move forgery detection technique with automatic threshold determination. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications 70(8):1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2016.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang XY, Liu YN, Xu H, Wang P, Yang HY (2018) Robust copy–move forgery detection using quaternion exponent moments. Pattern Anal Applic 21(2):451–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-016-0588-1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Yan Y, Ren W, Cao X (2019) Recolored Image Detection via a Deep Discriminative Model. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 14(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2018.2834155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang B, Sun X, Guo H, Xia Z, Chen X (2018) A copy-move forgery detection method based on CMFD-SIFT. Multimed Tools Appl 77(1):837–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-4289-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang W, Cao X, Qu Y, Hou Y, Zhao H, Zhang C (2010) Detecting and extracting the photo composites using planar homography and graph cut. IEEE Transactions On Information Forensics And Security 5(3):544–555. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2010.2051666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao F, Shi W, Qin B, Liang B (2017) Image forgery detection using segmentation and swarm intelligent algorithm. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences 22(2):141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-017-1227-4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhong J, Gan Y (2016) Detection of copy–move forgery using discrete analytical Fourier–Mellin transform. Nonlinear Dynamics 84(1):189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2374-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhong J, Gan Y, Young J, Huang L, Lin P (2017) A new block-based method for copy move forgery detection under image geometric transforms. Multimed Tools Appl 76(13):14887–14903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-4201-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhong J, Gan Y, Young J, Lin P (2017) Copy Move Forgery Image Detection via Discrete Radon and Polar Complex Exponential Transform-Based Moment Invariant Features. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 31(02):1754005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001417540052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou Z, Wang Y, Wu QJ, Yang CN, Sun X (2017) Effective and efficient global context verification for image copy detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 12(1):48–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2016.2601065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhu Y, Shen X, Chen H (2016) Copy-move forgery detection based on scaled ORB. Multimed Tools Appl 75(6):3221–3233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-2431-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Serbian Ministry of Science, Grant nos. III044006, III44009 and TR32023.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandra Pavlović.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pavlović, A., Glišović, N., Gavrovska, A. et al. Copy-move forgery detection based on multifractals. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 20655–20678 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7277-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7277-1

Keywords

Navigation