Skip to main content
Log in

An adaptable active contour model for medical image segmentation based on region and edge information

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the complexity of the internal structure of human body and the physiological movement of the illuminated tissue, the digital medical image exists low contrast, high noise intensity, complex internal structure and edge blur phenomenon, which will limit the segmentation accuracy of traditional active contour models. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a novel active contour model based on the combination of regional information and the edge information of the image. The new approach has four key characteristics. First the local information fitting of the image is incorporated into the pressure force function (SPF) of the SBGFRLS model, which improves the ability of dealing with medical images with low contrast and complex structure. Second, the adaptive balance of local information and global information is realized by adding a novel weighting function, which accelerates the evolution speed and enhances the adaptability of the model; Third, in the numerical implementation process of the proposed model, the divergence operator is replaced by the Gaussian filter, in this way, the level set function is smoothed and the computation is simplified. Last, a penalty term of symbolic function is introduced to reduce the computational complexity of the level set function due to re-initialization and regularization process. In order to verify the effectiveness of the model, we use different kinds of medical images for simulation experiments. Experimental results show that compared with the traditional active contour models, the proposed method can achieve an satisfactory both in segmentation speed and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

GAC:

Geometric active contour

LBF:

Local binary fitting

MR:

Magnetic resonance

References

  1. Bibi I, Liu F, Razi A et al (2017) Image segmentation by active contour model using hyperbolic trigonometric formulation. Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE. p 1–6

  2. Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G (1997) Geodesic active contours. Int J Comput Vis 22(1):61–79

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan TF, Vese L (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(2):266–277

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng J, Foo SW (2006) Dynamic directional gradient vector flow of snake. IEEE Trans Image Process 15(6):1563–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen LD (1991) On active contour models and balloons. CVGIP: Image Understanding 53(2):211–218

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hemalatha RJ, Vijaybaskar V, Thamizhvani TR (2018) Performance evaluation of contour based segmentation methods for ultrasound images. Advances in Multimedia 2018:Article ID 4976372, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4976372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li C, Kao CY, Gore JC et al (2008) Minimization of region-scalable fitting energy for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process 17(10):1940–1949

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu TT, Xu H, Jin W et al (2014) Medical image segmentation based on a hybrid region-based active contour model. Comput Math Methods Med. Article ID 890725, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/890725. 10 pages

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Y, Nie L, Liu L (2016) From action to activity: sensor-based activity recognition. Neurocomputing 181(12):108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Nie L , Han L (2015). Action2Activity: recognizing complex activities from sensor data. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1617–1623

  11. Liu W, Yang X, Tao D, Cheng J, Tang Y (2018) Multiview dimension reduction via hessian multiset canonical correlations. Information Fusion 41:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Min H, Jia W, Wang XF et al (2015) An intensity-texture model based level set method for image segmentation. Pattern Recogn 48(4):1547–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mumford D, Shah J (1989) Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Commun Pure Appl Math 42(5):577–685

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi N, Pan JX (2016) An improved active contours model for image segmentation by level set method. Optik 127(3):1037–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shivapatham G, Loganathan T (2017) Overview of medical image segmentation process of selected magnetic resonance images; manual segmentation and active contour/snake model. International Journal for Scientific Research and Development 5(5):618–621

  16. Tang J, Millington S (2006) Surface extraction and thickness measurement of the auricular cartilage from MR images using directional gradient vector flow snake. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(5):896–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tian Y, Duan FQ (2013) Active contour model combining region and edge information. Machine Vision and Applications 24(1):47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tu S, Li Y, Su Y (2015) Overview of SAR image segmentation based on active contour model. J Syst Eng Electron 37(8):1754–1766

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang XH, Fang LL (2013) Survey of image segmentation based on active contour model. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 26(8):751–760

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang XH, Song RX, Zhang C et al (2016) Image segmentation model based on adaptive adjustment of global and local information. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 26(3):179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu C, Prince JL (1998) Snakes, shapes and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans Image Process 7(3):359–369

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu J, Rui Y, Tao D (2014) Click prediction for web image reranking using multimodal sparse coding. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(5):2019–2032

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu J, Yang X, Gao F, Tao D (2017) Deep multimodal distance metric learning using click constraints for image ranking. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 47(12):4014–4024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zahir M, Mourad O, Abdelaziz O (2013) Performance comparison of active contour level set methods in image segmentation, Systems, Signal Processing and their Applications (WoSSPA), 2013 8th International Workshop on IEEE

  25. Zanaty EA, Ghoniemy S (2016) Medical image segmentation techniques: an overview. International Journal of Informatics and Medical Data Processing 1(1):16–37

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang K, Zhang L, Song H (2010) Active contours with selective local or global segmentation: a new formulation and level set method. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit 28(4):668–676

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research has been funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41671439 and 61402214), and Innovation Team Support Program of Liaoning Higher Education Department (LT2017013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xianghai Wang or Ruoxi Song.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Li, W., Zhang, C. et al. An adaptable active contour model for medical image segmentation based on region and edge information. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 33921–33937 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08073-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08073-3

Keywords

Navigation