Skip to main content
Log in

A security carving approach for AVI video based on frame size and index

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recovery of fragmented files is an important part of digital forensics. Video files are more likely to be fragmented since their sizes are relatively large that recovering video files without the file system information is meaningful. This paper presents a video recovery technique of a fragmented video file using the frame size information in every frame and the index. Many existing video recovery techniques attempt to recover videos using file system information or header/footer flag. These approaches may fail in the situations which the file system information is unknown or videos are fragmented. The proposed method addresses how to extract AVI file fragments from data images and map all the extracted fragments into original order. Experiments result show that mapping the AVI fragments according to the frame size information in every fragment and index is credible and the non-overwritten part of the fragmented video can be recovered using the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aronson L, van den Bos J (2011) Towards an engineering approach to file carver construction. In: 2011 IEEE 35th Annual of computer software and applications conference workshops (COMPSACW), pp 368–373

  2. AVI Format http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd318189(v=vs.85).aspx

  3. Billard D, Hauri R (2010) Making sense of unstructured flash-memory dumps. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM symposium on applied computing, SAC ’10. ACM, New York, pp 1579–1583

  4. Carrier B (2005) File system forensic analysis, vol 3. Addison-Wesley Reading

  5. Garfinkel S.L. (2007) Carving contiguous and fragmented files with fast object validation. Digit Investig 4:2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu B, Sheng VS (2016) A robust regularization path algorithm for ν-support vector classification. In: IEEE Transactions on neural networks and learning systems

  7. Hu C, Xu Z, Liu Y, Mei L, Chen L, Luo X (2014) Semantic link network-based model for organizing multimedia big data. IEEE Trans Emerg Topics Comput 2(3):376–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Memon N, Pal A (2006) Automated reassembly of file fragmented images using greedy algorithms. IEEE Trans Image Proces 15(2):385–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meyer DT, Bolosky WJ (2012) Study of practical deduplication. Trans Storage 7(4):14,1–14,20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Na GH, Shim KS, Moon KW, Kong S, Kim ES, Lee J (2014) Frame-based recovery of corrupted video files using video codec specifications. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(2):517–526

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Pal A, Memon N (2009) The evolution of file carving. IEEE Signal Process Mag 26(2):59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poisel R, Tjoa S (2011) Forensics investigations of multimedia data: A review of the state-of-the-art. In: 2011 Sixth international conference on IT security incident management and IT forensics (IMF), pp 48–61

  13. Poisel R, Tjoa S (2013) A comprehensive literature review of file carving. In: 2013 Eighth international conference on availability, reliability and security (ARES). IEEE, pp 475–484

  14. Poisel R, Tjoa S, Tavolato P (2011) Advanced file carving approaches for multimedia files. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks. Ubiq Comput Depend Appl 2 (4):42–58

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richard I I I G, Roussev V, Marziale L (2007) In-place file carving. In: Advances in digital forensics III. Springer, pp 217–230

  16. Richard I I I GG, Roussev V (2005) Scalpel: a frugal, high performance file carver. In: DFRWS

  17. Sencar HT, Memon N. (2008) Overview of state-of-the-art in digital image forensics. Algorithms, Architect Inf Syst Secur 3:325–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinebach M, Yannikos Y, Zmudzinski S, Winter C (2015) Advanced multimedia file carving. Wiley Online Library

  19. Thing V, Chua TW, Cheong ML (2011) Design of a digital forensics evidence reconstruction system for complex and obscure fragmented file carving. In: 2011 Seventh international conference on computational intelligence and security (CIS), pp 793–797

  20. Xu Z, Liu Y, Mei L, Hu C, Chen L (2015) Semantic based representing and organizing surveillance big data using video structural description technology. J Syst Softw 102:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Z (2011) Digital rights management ecosystem and its usage controls: a survey. Int J Dig Content Technol Appl 5(3):255–272

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Z (2012) Frontier and methodologies on digital rights management for multimedia social networks. Int J Digit Content Technol Appl 6(9)

  23. Zhangjie F, Xingming S, Qi L, Lu Z, Jiangang S (2015) Achieving efficient cloud search services: multi-keyword ranked search over encrypted cloud data supporting parallel computing. IEICE Trans Commun 98(1):190–200

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zheng Xu or Guozi Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Xu, Z., Liu, L. et al. A security carving approach for AVI video based on frame size and index. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 3293–3312 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3716-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3716-4

Keywords

Navigation