Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

PainDroid: an android-based virtual reality application for pain assessment

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earlier studies in the field of pain research suggest that little efficient intervention currently exists in response to the exponential increase in the prevalence of pain. In this paper, we present an Android application (PainDroid) with multimodal functionality that could be enhanced with Virtual Reality (VR) technology, which has been designed for the purpose of improving the assessment of this notoriously difficult medical concern. PainDroid has been evaluated for its usability and acceptability with a pilot group of potential users and clinicians, with initial results suggesting that it can be an effective and usable tool for improving the assessment of pain. Participant experiences indicated that the application was easy to use and the potential of the application was similarly appreciated by the clinicians involved in the evaluation. Our findings may be of considerable interest to healthcare providers, policy makers, and other parties that might be actively involved in the area of pain and VR research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker M, et al. Improving the current and future management of chronic pain: A European Consensus Report [online] Available: http://www.mijnpijn.nl/pdf/PainProposalEuropeanReport.pdf. Accessed on: 27/07/2012

  2. Basogain X, Izkara JL, Borro D (March 2007) Educational Mobile Environment with Augmented Reality Technology. In Proc Int Technol Educ Dev Conf, Valencia, 7–9

  3. Basu A, Raij A, Johnsen K (Febraury 2012) Ubiquitous Collaborative Activity Virtual Environments. ACM Conf Comput Support Cooperat Work. Seattle, Washington, 11–15

  4. Brooke J (1996) SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL (eds) Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cole J, Crowle S, Austwick G, Slater DH (2009) Exploratory findings with virtual reality for phantom limb pain; from stump motion to agency and analgesia. Disabil Rehabil 31:846–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzmaurice GW, Zhai S, Chignell MH (1993) Virtual reality for palmtop computers. ACM Trans Inform Syst 11(8):197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaggioli A, Amoresano A, Gruppioni E, Verni G, Riva G (2010) A myoelectric-controlled virtual hand for the assessment and treatment of phantom limb pain in trans-radial upper extremity amputees: a research protocol. Stud Health Technol Inform 154:220–222

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghinea G, Spyridonis F, Serif T, Frank AO (2008) 3-D pain drawings: mobile data collection using a PDA. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 12:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibson J, Frank AO (May 2004) Pain experienced by Electric Powered Indoor/Outdoor Chairs (EPIOC) users: A pilot exploration using pain drawings. In Proc. 2nd Meeting Eur. Fed. Phys. Rehab. Med., Vienna, Austria, p. 114

  10. Haefeli M, Elfering A (2006) Pain assessment. Eur Spine J 15:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffman HG et al (2011) Virtual reality as an adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Ann Behav Med 41:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holzinger A, Kosec P, Schwantzer G, Debevc M, Frühwirth J, Hofmann-Wellenhof R (2011) Design and development of a mobile computer application to reengineer workflows in the hospital and the methodology to evaluate its effectiveness. J Biomed Inform 44(6):563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holzinger A, Treitler P, Slany W (2012) Making Apps Useable on Multiple Different Mobile Platforms: On Interoperability for Business Application Development on Smart phones. In: G. Quirchmayr et al. (Eds): CD-ARES 2012, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS 7465, IIFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 176–189

  14. Jacob E et al (2012) Usability testing of a Smartphone for accessing a Web-based e-diary for self-monitoring of pain and symptoms in sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 34:326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jamison RN, Fanciullo GJ, Baird JC (2004) Usefulness of pain drawings in identifying real or imagined pain: accuracy of pain professionals, Non-professionals, and a decision model. J Pain 5:476–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jamison RN, Fanciullo GJ, Baird JC (2004) Computerized dynamic assessment of pain: comparison of chronic pain patients and healthy controls. Pain Med 5:168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. jPCT-AE. Welcome to jPCT-AE—a free 3D engine for android [online] Available: http://www.jpct.net/jpct-ae/

  18. Kwekkeboom KL, Cherwin CH, Lee JW, Wanta B (2010) Mind-body treatments for the pain-fatigue-sleep disturbance symptom cluster in persons with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 39:126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lalloo C, Henry JL (2011) Evaluation of the iconic pain assessment tool by heterogeneous group of people in pain. Pain Res Manag 16:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lamont K, Chin M, Kogan M (2011) Mirror box therapy: seeing is believing. Explore 7:369–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee SJ (2001) Pain measurement: understanding existing tools and their application in the emergency department. Emerg Med 13:279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li A, Montano Z, Chen VJ, Gold JI (2011) Virtual reality and pain management: current trends and future directions. Pain Manag 1:147–157

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lumsden J, Brewster S (2003) A Paradigm Shift: Alternative Interaction Techniques for Use with Mobile & Wearable Devices. In Proc CASCON ’03, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, IBM Press, 197–210

  24. Maani CV et al (2011) Combining ketamine and virtual reality pain control during severe burn wound care: one military and one civilian patient. Pain Med 12:673–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maani CV et al (2011) Virtual reality pain control during burn wound debridement of combat-related burn injuries using robot-like arm mounted VR goggles. J Trauma 71:S125–S130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mannion AF, Balague F, Pellise F, Cedraschi C (2007) Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3:610–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marceau LD, Link C, Jamison RN, Carolan S (2007) Electronic diaries as a tool to improve pain management: is there any evidence? Pain Med 8:S101–S109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Margolis RB, Tait RC, Krause SJ (1986) A rating system for use with patient pain drawings. Pain 24:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Masferrer R, Prendergast V, Hagell P (2003) Colored pain drawings: preliminary observations in neurosurgical practice. Eur J Pain 7:213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Murray CD et al (2007) The treatment of phantom limb pain using immersive virtual reality: three case studies. Disabil Rehabil 29:1465–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ohnmeiss DD (2000) Repeatability of pain drawings in a Low back pain population. Spine 25:980–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohnmeiss DD, Vanharanta H, Ekholm J (1999) Relationship of pain drawings to invasive tests assessing intervertebral disc pathology. Eur Spine J 8:126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Paggio P, Jongejan B (2001) Multimodal Communication in the Virtual Farm of the Staging Project. In Proc Int Workshop Inf Present Natural Multimod Dialogue, Verona, pp. 41–45

  34. Patterson DR, Jensen MP, Wiechman SA, Sharar SR (2010) Virtual reality hypnosis for pain associated with recovery from physical trauma. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 58:288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Patterson DR, Tininenko JR, Schmidt AR, Sharar SR (2004) Virtual reality hypnosis: a case report. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 52:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Patterson DR, Wiechman SA, Jensen MP, Sharar SR (2006) Hypnosis delivered through immersive virtual reality for burn pain: a clinical case series. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 54:130–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pirhonen A, Brewster SA, Holguin C (2002) Gestural and audio metaphors as a means of control for mobile devices. In: Proc ACM CHI. ACM Press, Minneapolis, pp 291–298

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rosser BA, Eccleston C (2011) Smartphone applications for pain management. J Telemed Telecare 17:308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sander Wint S, Eshelman D, Steele J, Guzzetta CE (2002) Effects of distraction using virtual reality glasses during lumbar punctures in adolescents with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 29:E8–E15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Serif T, Ghinea G (2005) Recording of time-varying back-pain data: a wireless solution. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 9:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Serif T, Ghinea G, Frank AO (2005) Visualizing pain data for wheelchair users: a ubiquitous approach. J Mobile Multimed 1:161–177

    Google Scholar 

  42. Spyridonis F, Gawronski J, Ghinea G, Frank AO (2012) An interactive 3D application for pain management: results from a pilot study in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. In press

  43. Von Baeyer CL, Lin V, Seidman LC, Tsao JC, Zeltzer LK (2011) Pain charts (body charts or manikins) in assessment of the location of pediatric pain. Pain Manag 1:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vuzix, Corp. Wrap 920 Video Eyewear [online] Available: http://www.vuzix.com/consumer/products_wrap920.html#overview

  45. Windich-Biermeier A, Sjoberg I, Dale JC, Eshelman D, Guzzetta CE (2007) Effects of distraction on pain, fear and distress during venous port access and venipuncture in children and adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 24:8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Cyberware, Inc. for providing a 3-D model, which we adapted and then manipulated and extended to meet this study’s needs. We also acknowledge EDB ErgoGroup for providing employee time to evaluate our application.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK

    Fotios Spyridonis, Jarle Hansen & Gheorghita Ghinea

  2. The Norwegian School of Information Technology, Oslo, Norway

    Tor-Morten Grønli & Gheorghita Ghinea

Authors
  1. Fotios Spyridonis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jarle Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tor-Morten Grønli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gheorghita Ghinea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fotios Spyridonis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spyridonis, F., Hansen, J., Grønli, TM. et al. PainDroid: an android-based virtual reality application for pain assessment. Multimed Tools Appl 72, 191–206 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1358-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1358-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation