Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A platform for virtual museums with personalized content

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presentation of content is an important aspect of today’s virtual reality applications, especially in domains such as virtual museums. The large amount and variety of exhibits in such applications raise a need for adaptation and personalization of the environment. This paper presents a content personalization platform for Virtual Museums, which is based on a semantic description of content and on information implicitly collected about the users through their interactions with the museum. The proposed platform uses stereotypes to initialize user models, adapts user profiles dynamically and clusters users into similar interest groups. A science fiction museum has been set up as a case study for this platform and an evaluation has been carried out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benyon D, Höök K (1997) Navigation in information spaces: supporting the individual. In: Howard S, Hammond J, Lindegaard G (eds) Human-computer interaction: INTERACT’97, pp 39–46

  2. Burke R (2002) Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments. User Model User-adapt Interact 12:331–370. doi:10.1023/A:1021240730564

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Celentano A, Pittarello F (2004) Observing and adapting user behavior in navigational 3D interfaces. Proc. of AVI 2004, pp 275–282

  4. Chittaro L, Ranon R (2002) Dynamic generation of personalized VRML content: a general approach and its application to 3D E-commerce, Proc. of the seventh international conference on 3D Web technology, pp 145–154

  5. Chittaro L, Ranon R, Ieronutti L (2003) Guiding visitors of Web3D Worlds through automatically generated tours, Proc. of Web3D 2003: 8th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, pp 27–38

  6. Ciabatti E, Cicnoni P, Montani C et al (1998) Towards a distributed 3D virtual museum. Proc. of Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp 264–266

  7. Corbit M (2002) Building virtual worlds for informal science learning (SciCentr and SciFair) in the Active Worlds Educational Universe (AWEDU). Presence 11(1):55–67. doi:10.1162/105474602317343659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Darken RP, Sibert JL (1993) A toolset for navigation in virtual environments. In Proc. of UIST’93, pp 157–165

  9. dos Santos C, Osorio F (2004) An intelligent and adaptive virtual environment and its application in distance learning. Proc. of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pp 362–365

  10. Economou D (2004) Virtual reality and museums: the development of a collaborative virtual environment for learning about ancient Egypt. Museology—International Scientific Electronic Journal 14(2)

  11. Eirinaki M, Vazirgiannis M (2003) Web mining for web personalization. ACM Trans Internet Technol 3(1):1–27. doi:10.1145/643477.643478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fink J, Kobsa A (2000) A review and analysis of commercial user modeling servers for personalization on the world wide web. User Model User-adapt Interact 10:209–249. doi:10.1023/A:1026597308943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Itzkovich I, Hawkes LW (1994) Fuzzy extension of inheritance hierarchies. Fuzzy Sets Syst 62:143–153. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(94)90054-X

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kang H, Yang H (2004) The effect of anonymity on the usage of avatar: comparison of internet relay chat and instant messenger. Proc. of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp 2734–2743

  15. Kim W, Kerschberg L, Scime A (2002) Learning for automatic personalization in a semantic taxonomy-based meta-search agent. Electron Commerce Res Appl 1:150–173. doi:10.1016/S1567-4223(02)00011-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YS, Kesavadas T, Paley S (2006) The virtual site museum: a multi-purpose, authoritative, and functional virtual heritage resource. Presence 15(3):245–261. doi:10.1162/pres.15.3.245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ko D, Sumi Y, Choi Y et al (1999) Personalized Virtual Exhibition Tour (PVET): an experiment for Internet collaboration. Proc Syst Man Cybern IEEE SMC 99:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kobsa A, Koenemann J, Pohl W (2001) Personalized hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships. Knowl Eng Rev 16(2):111–155. doi:10.1017/S0269888901000108

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lepouras G, Vassilakis C (2004) Virtual museums for all: employing game technology for edutainment. Virtual Real 8(2):96–106. doi:10.1007/s10055-004-0141-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lepouras G, Charitos D, Vassilakis C et al (2001) Building a VR-museum in a museum. Proc. of VRIC Virtual Reality International Conference

  21. MacQueen JB (1967) Some methods of classification and analysis of multivariate observations, Proc. of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp 281–297

  22. Minsky M (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 211–277

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mobasher B, Cooley R, Srivastava J (2000) Automatic personalization based on web usage mining. Commun ACM 43(8):142–151. doi:10.1145/345124.345169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Modjeska D, Waterworth J (2000) Effects of desktop 3D world design on user navigation and search performance, Proc. of IEEE Information Visualization, pp 215–220

  25. Mukherjee R, Sajja E, Sen S (2003) A movie recommendation system—an application of voting theory in user modeling. User Model User-adapt Interact 13(1–2):5–33. doi:10.1023/A:1024022819690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nowak KL, Rauh C (2005) The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. J Comput Mediat Commun 11(1):153–178. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00308.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Patel M, White M, Walczak K et al (2003) Digitization to presentation—Building virtual museum exhibitions. Proc. of Vision Video and Graphics, pp 1–8

  28. Perugini S, Goncalves MA, Fox EA (2004) Recommender systems research: a connection-centric survey. J Intell Inf Syst 23(2):107–143. doi:10.1023/B:JIIS.0000039532.05533.99

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Petridis P, White M, Mourkousis N et al (2005). Exploring and interacting with virtual museums, Proc. Of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA)

  30. Raskutti B, Beitz A, Ward B (1997) A feature-based approach to recommending selections based on past preferences. User Model User-adapt Interact 7:179–218. doi:10.1023/A:1008291330418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rich E (1979) User modeling via stereotypes. Cogn Sci 3:329–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rongen PHH, Schroder J, Dignum FPM et al (2005) Multi agent approach to interest profiling of users. Proc. of Multi-Agen Systems and Applications IV, pp 326–355

  33. Schaerf M, Tessicini A (1999) JubilEasy: build a personalized 3D visit of Rome. In Proc. of VRML 99—Fourth Symposium on the VRML, pp 105–112

  34. Schafer JB, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2001) E-commerce recommendation applications. Data Min Knowl Discov 5:115–153. doi:10.1023/A:1009804230409

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Su CJ, Yen B, Zhang X (1998) An internet based virtual exhibition system: conceptual design and infrastructure. Comp Ind Eng 35(3–4):615–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsichritzis D, Gibbs S (1991) Virtual museums and virtual realities. Proc. of International Conference on Hypermedia and Interactivity in Museums, pp 17–25

  37. Urban R, Marty P, Twidale M (2007) A second life for your museum: 3D multi-user virtual environments and museums. In: Trant J, Bearman D (eds) Proc. of Museums and the Web 2007

  38. Vinson NG (1999) Design guidelines for landmarks to support navigation in virtual environments. Proc CHI 99:278–285

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli & Dimitriou str. 185 34, Piraeus, Greece

    B. Bonis, J. Stamos & T. Panayiotopoulos

  2. Department of Product and Systems Design Engineering, University of the Aegean, Hermoupolis, Syros, 85100, Greece

    S. Vosinakis

  3. Department of Technology Education and Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli & Dimitriou str. 185 34, Piraeus, Greece

    I. Andreou

Authors
  1. B. Bonis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Stamos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Vosinakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Andreou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Panayiotopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Vosinakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonis, B., Stamos, J., Vosinakis, S. et al. A platform for virtual museums with personalized content. Multimed Tools Appl 42, 139–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-008-0231-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-008-0231-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation