Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Ranking Model for a Large-Scale Scientific Publication

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With a large number of scientific literature, it has been difficult to search for a set of relevant articles and to rank them. In this work, we propose a generalized network analysis approach (called N-star ranking model) for sorting them based on . The ranking of the result is considered in the mutual relationships between another classes: keyword, publication, citation. From the model, we propose two ranks for this problem: the Universal-Publication rank - (UP rank) and Topic-Publication rank (TP rank). We also study two simple ranks based on citation counting (RCC rank) and content matching (RCM rank). We propose the metrics for ranking comparison and analysis on two criteria value and order. We have conducted the experimentations for confirming the predictions and studying the features of the ranks. The results show that the proposed ranks are very impressive for the given problem since they consider the query/topic, the content of publication and the citations in the ranking model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Several famous keyword based scientific search engine are Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com), Microsoft Academic Search(http://academic.research.microsoft.com/), ArnetMiner (http://arnetminer.org/), etc

  2. http://academic.research.microsoft.com/ - Accessed on December 2013

  3. http://core.edu.au/

  4. NS is the short of N-star ranking model

References

  1. Agrawal S, Chaudhuri S, Das G (2002) DBXplorer: a system for keyword-based search over relational databases. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering, February 2002, San Jose, California, pp 5–16

  2. Balmin A, Hristidis V, Papakonstantinou Y (2004) Objectrank: Authority-based keyword search in databases. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, June 2004, Toronto, Canada, pp 564–575

  3. Bergamaschi S, Guerra F, Simonini G (2014) Keyword search over relational databases: Issues, approaches and open challenges. In: Bridging Between Information Retrieval and Databases, LNCS, vol 8173, pp 54–73

  4. Cohen S, Mamou J, Kanza Y, Sagiv Y (2003) XSEarch: A semantic search engine for XML. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, September 2003, Berlin, Germany, pp 45–56

  5. Cronin B (2001) Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. J Inf Sci 27(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Egghe L (2006) Theory and practise of the G-index. Scientometrics 69:131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuhr N (2014) Bridging information retrieval and databases. In: Bridging Between Information Retrieval and Databases, LNCS 8173. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 97–115

  8. Garfield E (1999) Journal impact factor: A brief review. Can Med Assoc J 161(8):979–980

    Google Scholar 

  9. Getoor L, Diehl CP (2005) Link mining: A survey. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 7(2):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo L, Shao F, Botev C, Shanmugasundaram J (2003) XRANK: Ranked keyword search over XML documents. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, June 2003, San Diego, California, pp 16–27

  11. Hoang HH, Jung JJ, Tran CP (2014) Ontology-based approaches for cross-enterprise collaboration: a literature review on semantic business process management. Enterp Inf Syst 8(6):648–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He H, Wang H, Yang J, Yu PS (2007) BLINKS: Ranked keyword searches on graphs. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, June 2007, Beijing, China, pp 305–316

  13. Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA 572(46):16,569–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirsch JE (2007) Does the H index have predictive power? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 198(49):19,193–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hristidis V, Papakonstantinou Y (2002) Discover: Keyword search in relational databases. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, August 2002, Hong Kong, China, pp 670–681

  16. Hulgeri A, Nakhe C (2002) Keyword searching and browsing in databases using BANKS. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering, pp 431–440

  17. Jiang X, Sun X, Zhuge H (2012) Towards an effective and unbiased ranking of scientific literature through mutual reinforcements. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, November 2012, Hawaii, USA, pp 714–723

  18. Jiang X, Sun X, Zhuge H (2013) Graph-based algorithms for ranking researchers: not all swans are white!. Scientometrics 96(3):743–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung JJ (2011) Ubiquitous Conference Management System for Mobile Recommendation Services Based on Mobilizing Social Networks: a Case Study of u-Conference. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):12786–12790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jung JJ (2012) ContextGrid: A Contextual Mashup-based Collaborative Browsing System. Inf Syst Front 14(4):953–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jung JJ (2013) Contextual Synchronization for Efficient Social Collaborations in Enterprise Computing: a Case Study on TweetPulse. Concurr Eng-Res Appl 21(3):209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jung JJ (2014) Understanding information propagation on online social tagging systems: a case study on Flickr. Qual Quant 48(2):745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kargar M, An A (2011) Keyword search in graphs: Finding r-cliques. Proc VLDB Endowment 4(10):681–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Keener JP (1993) The Perron-Frobenius theorem and the ranking of football teams. SIAM Rev 35(1):80–93

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Kendall M (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika pp 81–93

  26. Kien LT (2012) Information Dependency and Its Applications. Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences. University of Greifswald, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kleinberg JM (1999) Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J ACM 46(5):604–632

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Lowry PB, Moody GD, Gaskin J, Galletta DF, Humpherys SL, Barlow JB, Wilson DW (2013) Evaluating journal quality and the association for information systems senior scholars’ journal basket via bibliometric measures: Do expert journal assessments add value? MIS Q 37(4):993–1012

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nelsen R (2006) An Introduction to Copulas, 2nd ed. Springer Series in Statistics

  30. Nguyen DT, Jung JJ (2014) Privacy-preserving Discovery of Topic-based Events from Social Sensor Signals: An Experimental Study on Twitter. Scientific World Journal 2014:Article ID 204785

  31. Nie Z, Zhang Y, Wen JR, Ma WY (2005) Object-level ranking: Bringing order to web objects. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 2005, Chiba, Japan, pp 567–574

  32. Opthof T (1997) Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovasc Res 33(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Page L, Brin S, Motwani R (1999) The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web

  34. Radicchi F, Fortunato S, Markines B, Vespignani A (2009) Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists. Phys Rev E 112(5):056,103–056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roa-Valverde AJ, Sicilia MA (2014) A survey of approaches for ranking on the web of data. Information Retrieval pp 1–31

  36. Sánchez-Burillo E, Duch J, Gómez-Gardeñes J, Zueco D (2012) Quantum navigation and ranking in complex networks. Sci Rep 2:605–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sayyadi H, Getoor L (2009) FutureRank: ranking scientific articles by predicting their future pagerank. In: Proceedings of 2009 SIAM Conference on Data Mining, pp 533–544

  38. Selvan MP, chandra Sekar A, Dharshini AP (2012) Article: Survey on web page ranking algorithms. Int J Computer Appl 41(19):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sharma DK, Sharma A (2010) A comparative analysis of web page ranking algorithms. Int J Comput Sci Eng 02(8): 2670–2676

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stefanidis K, Drosou M, Pitoura E (2010) PerK: Personalized keyword search in relational databases through preferences. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, March 2010, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp 585–596

  41. Sun Y, Han J, Zhao P, Yin Z, Cheng H, Wu T (2009a) RankClus: Integrating clustering with ranking for heterogeneous information network analysis. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology, March 2009, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp 565–576

  42. Sun Y, Yu Y, Han J (2009b) Ranking-based clustering of heterogeneous information networks with star network schema. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, June 2009. Paris, France, pp 797–806

  43. Vu LA, Hoang HV, Kien LT, Hieu LT, Jung JJ (2014a) Evaluating scientific publications by n-linear ranking model. Annales University Science Budapest, Sect Comp to appear

  44. Vu LA, Hoang HV, Kien LT, Hieu LT, Jung JJ (2014b) A general model for mutual ranking systems. In: Intelligent Information and Database Systems. Springer, pp 211–220

  45. Wang H, Aggarwal CC (2010) A survey of algorithms for keyword search on graph data. In: Managing and Mining Graph Data, Advances in Database Systems, vol 40. Springer, pp 249–273

  46. Yan E, Ding Y, Sugimoto C (2011) P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 62(3):467–477

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yu JX, Qin L, Chang L (2009) Keyword Search in Databases. Morgan and Claypool Publishers

  48. Zeng Z, Bao Z, Lee M, Ling T (2013) A semantic approach to keyword search over relational databases. In: Conceptual Modeling, LNCS, vol 8217, pp 241–254

  49. Zhang CT (2009) The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS ONE 4(5):1–4

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou D, Orshanskiy S, Zha H, Giles C (2007) Co-ranking authors and documents in a heterogeneous network. In: Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp 739–744

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2014R1A2A2A05007154). Also, this work was supported by the MSIP (Ministry of Science, ICT&Future Planning), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program (NIPA-2014-H0301-14-1044) supervised by the NIPA (National ICT Industry Promotion Agency).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jai E. Jung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sohn, BS., Jung, J.E. A Novel Ranking Model for a Large-Scale Scientific Publication. Mobile Netw Appl 20, 508–520 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-014-0539-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-014-0539-2

Keywords

Navigation