Abstract
Although molecular markers allow more accurate selection in early generations than conventional screens, large numbers can make selection impracticable while screening in later generations may provide little or no advantage over conventional selection techniques. Investigation of different crossing strategies and consideration of when to screen, what proportion to retain and the impacts of dominant vs. codominant marker expression revealed important choices in the design of marker-assisted selection programs that can produce large efficiency gains. Using F2 enrichment increased the frequency of selected alleles allowing large reductions in minimum population size for recovery of target genotypes (commonly around 90%) and/or selection at a greater number of loci. Increasing homozygosity by inbreeding from F2 to F2:3 also reduced population size by around 90% in some crosses with smaller incremental reductions in subsequent generations. Backcrossing was found to be a useful strategy to reduce population size compared with a biparental population where one parent contributed more target alleles than the other and was complementary to F2 enrichment and increasing homozygosity. Codominant markers removed the need for progeny testing reducing the number of individuals that had to be screened to identify a target genotype. However, although codominant markers allow target alleles to be fixed in early generations, minimum population sizes are often so large in F2 that it is not efficient to do so at this stage. Formulae and tables for calculating genotypic frequencies and minimum population sizes are provided to allow extension to different breeding systems, numbers of target loci, and probabilities of failure. Principles outlined are applicable to implementation of markers for both quantitative trait loci (QTL) and major genes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H.S. Bariana R.A. McIntosh (1993) ArticleTitleCytogenetics studies in wheat XIV. Location of rust resistance genes in VPM1 and their genetic linkage with other disease resistance genes in chromosome 2A Genome 36 476–482
M.H. Ellis W. Spielmeyer K. Gale G.J. Rebetzke R.A. Richards (2002) ArticleTitlePerfect markers for the Rht-B1bRht-D1b dwarfing mutations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Theor. Appl. Genet. 105 1038–1042
D.S. Falconer T.F.C. Mackay (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics EditionNumber4 Longman Group Ltd Essex, UK
W.D. Hanson (1959) ArticleTitleMinimum family sizes for the planning of genetic experiments Agron. J. 51 711–715
N.K. Howes S.M. Woods T.F. Townley-Smith (1998) ArticleTitleSimulations and practical problems of applying multiple marker assisted selection and doubled haploids to wheat breeding programs Euphytica 100 225–230
R.M.D. Koebner R.W. Summers (2003) ArticleTitle21st century wheat breeding: plot selection or plate detection? Trends Biotechnol. 21 59–63
V. Korzun M.S. Röder M.W. Ganal A.J. Worland C.N. Law (1998) ArticleTitleGenetic analysis of the dwarfing gene (Rht8) in wheat. I. Molecular mapping of Rht8 on the short arm of chromosome 2D of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) Theor. Appl. Genet. 96 1104–1109
H. Kuchel, P. Warner, R.L. Fox, K. Chalmers, N. Howes, P. Langridge, S.P. Jefferies. 2003. Whole genome based marker assisted selection strategies in wheat breedingProc. 10th International Wheat Genetics Symposium. Paestum, Italy, 1–6 SeptemberVol. 1,pp. 144--147.
C.C. Li (1955) Population Genetics The University of Chicago Press USA
W. Ma W. Zhang K.R. Gale (2003) ArticleTitleMultiplex-PCR typing of high molecular weight glutenin alleles in wheat Euphytica 134 51–60 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026191918704 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXotFemurY%3D
R.A. McIntosh, G.E. Hart, K.M. Devos, M.D. Gale, W.D. Rogers. 1998.Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. Proc. 9th International Wheat Genetics Symposium Saskatchewan, Canada Saskatoon. August Vol. 5. pp. 2--7
F.C. Ogbonnaya N.C. Subrahmanyam O. Moullet J. de Majnik H.A. Eagles J.S. Brown R.F. Eastwood J. Kollmorgan R. Appels E.S. Lagudah (2001) ArticleTitleDiagnostic DNA markers for cereal cyst nematode resistance in bread wheat Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52 1367–1374
G.J. Rebetzke R.A. Richards (2000) ArticleTitleGibberellic acid-sensitive dwarfing genes reduce plant height to increase kernel number and grain yield of wheat Aust. J. Agric. Res. 55 235–245
J.R. Sedcole (1977) ArticleTitleNumber of plants necessary to recover a trait Crop Sci. 17 667–668
W. Spielmeyer P.W. Sharp E.S. Lagudah (2003) ArticleTitleIdentification and validation of markers linked to broad-spectrum stem rust resistance gene Sr2 in wheat Crop Sci. 43 333–336
W. Zhang M.C. Gianibelli L.R. Rampling K.R. Gale (2004) ArticleTitleCharacterisation and marker development for low molecular weight glutenin genes from Glu-A3 alleles of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) Theor. Appl. Genet. 108 1409–1419
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonnett, D., Rebetzke, G. & Spielmeyer, W. Strategies for efficient implementation of molecular markers in wheat breeding. Mol Breeding 15, 75–85 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-004-2734-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-004-2734-5