Skip to main content
Log in

Familiarity increases subjective positive affect even in non-affective and non-evaluative contexts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research shows that the experience of familiarity involves the experience of positive affect. In two experiments we clarify and extend this research by showing that the experience of familiarity involves the experience of positive affect even when the nature of the experimental task is non-affective and non-evaluative and even when participants are actively performing other cognitive operations—that the association of familiarity and positive affect is not disrupted by (non-affective and non-evaluative) judgments regardless of whether familiarity does or does not play a role in those judgments. Experiment 1 used a non-affective but evaluative task and Experiment 2 a completely non-evaluative task. Both studies manipulated familiarity through re-exposure and showed that processing familiar stimuli induced a pleasurable subjective experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241–252. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I., Armour, V., & Kerr, T. (1985). On believing what we remember. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 17, 199–214. doi:10.1037/h0080140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1978. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103–128. doi:10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claypool, H. M., Hugenberg, K., Housley, M. K., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Familiar eyes are smiling: On the role of familiarity in the perception of facial affect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 856–866. doi:10.1002/ejsp.422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damásio, A. R. (1994). Decartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M., Holland, R. W., Chenier, T., Starr, M. J., & Winkielman, P. (2010). Happiness cools the warm glow of familiarity psychophysiological evidence that mood modulates the familiarity-affect link. Psychological Science, 21, 321–328. doi:10.1177/0956797609359878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238–257. doi:10.1177/1088868309352251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Marques, T. (1999). The mind needs the heart: The mood-as-regulation-mechanism hypothesis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lisboa: Universidade de Lisboa.

  • Garcia-Marques, T. (2004). A Mensuração da variável “Estado de Espírito” na população Portuguesa (Measuring mood in the Portuguese population). Laboratório de Psicologia, 21, 77–94. doi:10.14417/lp.778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2000). The positive feeling of familiarity: Mood as an information processing regulation mechanism. In J. Forgas & H. Bless (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experiences in social cognition and behavior (pp. 240–261). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2001). The feeling of familiarity as a regulator of persuasive processing. Social Cognition, 19, 9–34. doi:10.1521/soco.19.1.9.18959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2004). Positivity can cue familiarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1–9. doi:10.1177/0146167203262856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2010). Is it familiar or positive? Mutual facilitation of response latencies. Social Cognition, 28, 205–218. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.2.205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889–898. doi:10.1177/0146167201277011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A., & Hawley, K. J. (1994). Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 56–72. doi:10.3758/bf03200761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H.-I., Shimojo, S., & Yeh, S.-L. (2013). Happy faces are preferred regardless of familiarity—sad faces are preferred only when familiar. Emotion, 13, 391–396. doi:10.1037/a0030861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462–466. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monin, B. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1035–1048. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50. doi:10.1080/02699938708408362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaf, R. H., & Rotteveel, M. (2005). Affective modulation of recognition bias. Emotion, 5, 309–318. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, T. S. (1992). Perception without awareness in the stream of behavior: Processes that produce and limit nonconscious biasing effects. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness (pp. 277–296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435–451. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergerie, K., Lepage, M., & Armony, J. L. (2007). Influence of emotional expression on memory recognition bias: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 1126–1133. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.12.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29–39. doi:10.1037/h0024127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1910). A textbook of psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235–1253. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation, and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 84–106. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch, K. C. Klauer, J. Musch, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 9, 1–27. doi:10.1037/h0025848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Preparation of this manuscript was supported by a Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Grant PTDC/PSI-PCO/121916/2010 to Teresa Garcia-Marques.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Garcia-Marques.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garcia-Marques, T., Prada, M. & Mackie, D.M. Familiarity increases subjective positive affect even in non-affective and non-evaluative contexts. Motiv Emot 40, 638–645 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9555-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9555-9

Keywords

Navigation