Abstract
Previous research shows that the experience of familiarity involves the experience of positive affect. In two experiments we clarify and extend this research by showing that the experience of familiarity involves the experience of positive affect even when the nature of the experimental task is non-affective and non-evaluative and even when participants are actively performing other cognitive operations—that the association of familiarity and positive affect is not disrupted by (non-affective and non-evaluative) judgments regardless of whether familiarity does or does not play a role in those judgments. Experiment 1 used a non-affective but evaluative task and Experiment 2 a completely non-evaluative task. Both studies manipulated familiarity through re-exposure and showed that processing familiar stimuli induced a pleasurable subjective experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241–252. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241.
Begg, I., Armour, V., & Kerr, T. (1985). On believing what we remember. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 17, 199–214. doi:10.1037/h0080140.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1978. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265.
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103–128. doi:10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103.
Claypool, H. M., Hugenberg, K., Housley, M. K., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Familiar eyes are smiling: On the role of familiarity in the perception of facial affect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 856–866. doi:10.1002/ejsp.422.
Damásio, A. R. (1994). Decartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Picador.
De Vries, M., Holland, R. W., Chenier, T., Starr, M. J., & Winkielman, P. (2010). Happiness cools the warm glow of familiarity psychophysiological evidence that mood modulates the familiarity-affect link. Psychological Science, 21, 321–328. doi:10.1177/0956797609359878.
Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238–257. doi:10.1177/1088868309352251.
Garcia-Marques, T. (1999). The mind needs the heart: The mood-as-regulation-mechanism hypothesis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lisboa: Universidade de Lisboa.
Garcia-Marques, T. (2004). A Mensuração da variável “Estado de Espírito” na população Portuguesa (Measuring mood in the Portuguese population). Laboratório de Psicologia, 21, 77–94. doi:10.14417/lp.778.
Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2000). The positive feeling of familiarity: Mood as an information processing regulation mechanism. In J. Forgas & H. Bless (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experiences in social cognition and behavior (pp. 240–261). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2001). The feeling of familiarity as a regulator of persuasive processing. Social Cognition, 19, 9–34. doi:10.1521/soco.19.1.9.18959.
Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2004). Positivity can cue familiarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1–9. doi:10.1177/0146167203262856.
Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2010). Is it familiar or positive? Mutual facilitation of response latencies. Social Cognition, 28, 205–218. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.2.205.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889–898. doi:10.1177/0146167201277011.
Johnston, W. A., & Hawley, K. J. (1994). Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 56–72. doi:10.3758/bf03200761.
Liao, H.-I., Shimojo, S., & Yeh, S.-L. (2013). Happy faces are preferred regardless of familiarity—sad faces are preferred only when familiar. Emotion, 13, 391–396. doi:10.1037/a0030861.
Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462–466. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00289.
Monin, B. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1035–1048. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1035.
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50. doi:10.1080/02699938708408362.
Phaf, R. H., & Rotteveel, M. (2005). Affective modulation of recognition bias. Emotion, 5, 309–318. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309.
Pittman, T. S. (1992). Perception without awareness in the stream of behavior: Processes that produce and limit nonconscious biasing effects. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness (pp. 277–296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008.
Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435–451. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.435.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Sergerie, K., Lepage, M., & Armony, J. L. (2007). Influence of emotional expression on memory recognition bias: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 1126–1133. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.12.024.
Simon, H. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29–39. doi:10.1037/h0024127.
Titchener, E. B. (1910). A textbook of psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235–1253. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation, and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 84–106. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.84.
Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989.
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch, K. C. Klauer, J. Musch, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 9, 1–27. doi:10.1037/h0025848.
Acknowledgments
Preparation of this manuscript was supported by a Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Grant PTDC/PSI-PCO/121916/2010 to Teresa Garcia-Marques.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garcia-Marques, T., Prada, M. & Mackie, D.M. Familiarity increases subjective positive affect even in non-affective and non-evaluative contexts. Motiv Emot 40, 638–645 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9555-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9555-9