Skip to main content
Log in

Systems approaches to the treatment of motivation in human action: Three notes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Baumeister’s energizing call-to-arms suggests theorists might wish to adopt more “radical” approaches toward theorizing about the role of motivation in human action. By radical, I mean re-igniting strands of theoretical analysis that were once more common in psychological scholarship but which have fallen to the wayside. At the heart of this argument is the proposal that theorists adopt an explicit systems approach to the study of motivation. Motivation would be neither a property of the organism potentially harboring it nor of the environment that triggers it. Instead, the complex interplay between the organism and environment would be the primary object of analysis. With this in mind, it would be wise to make three specific three notes. First, people are motivated not only by what they want to do, they literally feel anxious to avoid undesired actions and outcomes, too. Second, adaptive motivation would likely match motive to affordances in the environment that aid in motivational pursuits. Third, it might be important to identify a basic level in motivations, the level of motivational specificity containing the motives that predominantly drive human action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2016). Toward a general theory of motivation: Problems, challenges, opportunities, and the Big Picture. Motivation and Emotion, (this issue).

  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D. (2015). Motivational theories. In B. Gawronski & G. Bodenhausen (Eds.), Theory and explanation in social psychology (pp. 108–131). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Anderson, J. E., Schlösser, T., Ehlebracht, D., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 122–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (in press). The psychology of respect: A case study of how behavioral norms regulate human action. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (vol. 3). New York: Elsevier.

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetchenhauer, D., & Dunning, D. (2009). Do people trust too much or too little? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetchenhauer, D., & Dunning, D. (2012). Betrayal aversion versus principled trustfulness: How to explain risk avoidance and risky choices in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81, 534–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, L. S., Reis, T. J., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1135–1149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In H. Eysenck (Ed.), A model of personality (pp. 246–276). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, B. (2009). The four causes. Journal of Philosophy, 106, 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, W. M. (1977). James J. Gibson’s strategy for perceiving: Ask not what’s inside your head, but what your head’s inside of. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlösser, T., Fetchenhauer, D., & Dunning, D. (in press). Against all odds? The emotional dynamics underlying trust. Decision.

  • Schlösser, T., Mensching, O., Dunning, D., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2015). Trust and rationality: Shifting normative analyses in risks involving other people versus nature. Social Cognition, 33, 459–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The article was supported by no outside funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Dunning.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dunning declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any study with human participants or animals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunning, D. Systems approaches to the treatment of motivation in human action: Three notes. Motiv Emot 40, 27–30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9533-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9533-7

Keywords

Navigation