Abstract
Previous research suggests that a combination of high need for power, low need for affiliation, and high activity inhibition—the so-called leadership motive pattern—is related to high leader effectiveness. However, when studying this relation, research has mainly relied on a typological approach based on dichotomous configurations of motives instead of using a dimensional approach via regression analysis with interaction terms. Applying the latter approach, we explored separate and interactive effects of need for power, need for affiliation, and activity inhibition on managerial performance. We administered picture story exercises to 70 managers, and found the three-way interaction between predictors to account for increases in income and team goal attainment. Follow-up analyses indicated that managers are most successful when they are high in all three predictors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
According to Spangler and House (1991), if the composition of the LMP is to be tested the classical index definition by McClelland and Boyatzis (1982) should be included in the analyses. We therefore adjusted the T score-based definition of McClelland and Boyatzis (1982) to z scores and reran our analyses entering the dichotomous LMP index in the first step of the regressions. Still, the three-way interaction significantly predicted both measures of leader performance.
In the study by McClelland and Boyatzis (1982) all managers considered were males. As in our study, 22.9 % of the participants were females we additionally reran the analyses with gender as a covariate. Findings, however, remained unchanged if gender was entered as the first step of the regression. Results of the subsequent slope difference tests (Dawson and Richter 2006) were also in line with the findings not adjusting for gender. Considering the outcome goal attainment, slope (1) significantly differed from all other slopes, whereas slopes (2), (3), and (4) did not significantly differ from each other. Significant differences between slope (1) and slopes (2) and (3) were found for the outcome developments in a manager’s income. The difference between slope (1) and slope (4) for this outcome was, again, only by tendency significant, while differences between slopes (2), (3), and (4) were not significant. Besides rerunning the analyses controlling for gender, we also examined the contribution of the three-way interaction within the sample of male managers solely. Irrespective of the outcome studied, within this subsample regression weights of the three-way interaction term were as well positive.
References
Arthur, M. B., Khapova, S. N., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2005). Career success in a boundaryless world. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 177–202. doi:10.1002/job.290.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant leadership: Renewing yourself and connecting with others through mindfulness, hope, and compassion. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Boyatzis, R. E., Smith, M. L., & Blaize, N. (2006). Developing sustainable leaders through coaching and compassion. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 8–24. doi:10.5465/amle.2006.20388381.
Burnham, D. H. (1997). Power is still the great motivator—With a difference! Burnham Rosen Group, LLC. Leadership Development and Strategic Consulting.
Cornelius, E. T., & Lane, F. B. (1984). The power motive and managerial success in a professionally oriented service industry organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 32–39. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.69.1.32.
Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917.
Dilchert, S., & Ones, D. S. (2008). Personality predictors of managerial salary. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 7, 1–23. doi:10.1026/1617-6391.7.1.1.
Do, M. H., & Minbashian, A. (2014). A meta-analytic examination of the effects of the agentic and affiliative aspects of extraversion on leadership outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 1040–1053. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.004.
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader–member-exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1715–1759. doi:10.1177/0149206311415280.
Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs subjective measurement of work stress and question of longitudinal studies. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping, and consequences of stress at work (pp. 375–411). Chichester: Wiley.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–177. doi:10.2307/2092623.
Heyns, R. W., & Atkinson, J. W. (1958). A scoring manual for the affiliation motive. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society (pp. 205–218). New York: Van Nostrand. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527937.015.
Hofer, J., & Busch, H. (2011). When the needs for affiliation and intimacy are frustrated: Envy and direct aggression among German and Cameroonian adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 219–228. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.003.
Jacobs, R. L., & McClelland, D. (1994). Moving up the corporate ladder: A longitudinal study of the leadership motive pattern and managerial success in women and men. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 46, 32–41. doi:10.1037/1061-4087.46.1.32.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.765.
Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48, 485–519. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01767.x.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36–51. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755.
Kirkpatrick, S. A., Wofford, J. C., & Baum, J. R. (2002). Measuring motive imagery contained in the vision statement. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 139–150. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00096-6.
Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 826. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826.
Lai, J. Y. M., Lam, L. W., & Lam, S. S. K. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A team cultural perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 1039–1056. doi:10.1002/job.1840.
Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–425. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90027-2.
McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington.
McClelland, D. C. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merits of operant and respondent measures. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 10–41). Beverly Hills: Sage.
McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.
McClelland, D. (1992). Motivational configurations. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 87–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527937.015.
McClelland, D. C., & Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). Leadership motive pattern and long-term success in management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 737–743. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.67.6.737.
McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. H. (1976). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 54, 100–110.
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.96.4.690.
Minbashian, A., Earl, J., & Bright, J. E. H. (2013). Openness to experience as a predictor of job performance trajectories. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 62, 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00490.x.
Nicholson, N. (2000). Motivation-selection-connection: An evolutionary model of career development. In M. A. Peiperl, M. B. Arthur, R. Goffee, & T. Morris (Eds.), Career frontiers: New concepts of working lives (pp. 54–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nübold, A., Dörr, S. L., & Maier, G. W. (2014). Considering the orphan: Personal identification and its relations with transformational leadership, trust, and performance in a three-path mediation model. Leadership. doi:10.1177/1742715014522679.
Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 419–489). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2001). Assessment of implicit motives with a research version of the TAT: Picture profiles, gender differences, and relations to other personality measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 71–86. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7701_05.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Pang, J. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology (pp. 323–344). New York: Guilford.
Schultheiss, O. C., Riebel, K., & Jones, N. M. (2009). Activity inhibition: A predictor of lateralized brain function during stress? Neuropsychology, 23, 392–404. doi:10.1037/a0014591.
Smith, C. P. (1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, C. P., Feld, S. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Methodological considerations: Steps in research employing content analysis systems. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 515–536). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Spangler, W. D., & House, R. J. (1991). Presidential effectiveness and the leadership motive profile. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 439–455. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.60.3.439.
Veroff, J. (1992). Thematic apperceptive methods in survey research. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 100–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527937.007.
Wanous, J. P., & Hudy, M. J. (2001). Single-item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 361–375. doi:10.1177/109442810144003.
Wilkin, C. L. (2013). I can’t get no job satisfaction: Meta-analysis comparing permanent and contingent workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 47–64. doi:10.1002/job.1790.
Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: The Free Press.
Winter, D. G. (1978). Navy leadership and management competencies: Convergence among tests, interviews, and performance ratings. Boston: McBer and Company.
Winter, D. G. (1987). Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 196–202. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.196.
Winter, D. G. (1991). A motivational model of leadership: Predicting long-term management success from TAT measures of power motivation and responsibility. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 67–80. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(91)90023-U.
Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text (version 4.2). Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 84–94. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.84.
Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Ziegler, R., Hagen, B., & Diehl, M. (2012). Relationship between job satisfaction and job performance: Job ambivalence as a moderator. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2019–2040. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00929.
Acknowledgments
The present data was collected as part of the dissertation of the second author. We thank Clemens Schmitt for his assistance in coding the picture story exercises.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steinmann, B., Dörr, S.L., Schultheiss, O.C. et al. Implicit motives and leadership performance revisited: What constitutes the leadership motive pattern?. Motiv Emot 39, 167–174 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9458-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9458-6