Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Land Area Eligible for Afforestation and Reforestation within the Clean Development Mechanism: A Global Analysis of the Impact of Forest Definition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Kyoto Protocol, countries have significant latitude to define a forest. The most important parameter affecting area designated as forest is the minimum crown cover which can be set between 10 and 30%. The choice will have implications for the amount of land available in a country for afforestation and reforestation activities within the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM-AR). In this paper, we present an analysis of the regional differences in land availability for CDM-AR projects. We then examine how the choice of a high or low threshold value for crown cover will affect the area available for CDM activities and how the limitations imposed by this element of the definition compares to other factors that are likely to limit CDM activities. Results represent a global analysis that included all countries not included in Annex I of the Kyoto Protocol, and examined the effect on land availability of a range of crown cover thresholds ranging from 10–30%. Of the 140 Non-Annex One countries, 107 countries were found to have a potential for CDM-AR projects. Asia had the largest amount of combined area suitable for CDM-AR at the 10% crown cover threshold level. However, at 30%, South America had the greatest amount of land available, and a large change in available land area, which increased by almost five times compared to what was available at the 10% threshold. The area available in Africa increased by a factor of 5.5. Central America showed the largest increase, to almost 10 times more at the 30% threshold. By contrast, within Asia, the area increase was comparatively less, but still the area nearly doubled. Globally, a low threshold of 10% crown cover excluded almost 2/3 of the land identified that was eligible at 30%, over 5 million km2. The spatial analyses showed not only the effects of the choice of the crown cover criterion, but also where the land was available for CDM activities within each country at different thresholds. Protected areas account for 10–20% of the CDM-AR eligible area in most countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration - guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Rome

  • Cosbey A, Parry JE, Browne J, Babu YD, Bandachari P, Drexhage J, Murpey D (2005) Realizing the development dividend: making the CDM work for developing Countries. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 72 pp

  • Dutschke M (2002) Sustainable forestry investment under the clean development mechanism: The Malaysian case discussion paper no. 198. Hamburgisches Welt-Wirtschafts-Archiv (HWWA). Hamburg Institute of International Economics. (Available on http://www.hwwa.de/Publikationen/Discussion_Paper/2002/198.pdf)

  • FACE (Forests Absorbing Carbon Emissions) (1998) Annual report 1997. FACE Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands, 28 pp

  • FAO (2000) On definitions of forest and forest change. Working Paper 33, Forest Resources Assessment Programme, Rome, Italy. (Available on: www.fao.org/forestry/fra)

  • FAO (2004) Global forest resources assessment update 2005: terms and definitions. Working Paper 83, Forest Resources Assessment Programme, Rome, Italy. (Available on: www.fao.org/forestry/fra)

  • FAO (2005) Report on 3rd expert meeting on forest-related definitions 17–19 January 2005, Rome, Italy. (Available on: www.fao.org/forestry/fra)

  • Hansen M, DeFries R, Townshend JR, Carroll M, Dimiceli C, Sohlberg R (2003) 500 m MODIS vegetation continuous fields. The Global Land Cover Facility, College Park, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves GH (1994) Defining and using reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 120(6):1132–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms JA (2002) Forest, forestry, forester: What do these terms mean? J Forest 100:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2004) The WorldClim Interpolated Global Terrestrial Climate Surfaces. Version 1.3. Downloaded at: http://biogeo.berkeley.edu/worldclim/worldclim.htm

  • IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IGES, Hayama, Japan

  • Kant P (2005) Definition of forests under the Kyoto Protocol: choosing appropriate values for crown cover, area and tree height for India. Indian Forester

  • Kindt R, Simons AJ, Van Damme P (2004) Do farm characteristics explain differences in tree species diversity among Western Kenyan farms? Agroforest Syst 63:63–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindt R, Van Damme P, Simons AJ (2005) Tree diversity in western Kenya: using profiles to characterise richness and evenness. Biodivers Conserv 15(4):1253–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korner C, Paulsen J (2004) A world-wide study of high altitude treeline temperatures. J Biogeogr 31(5):713–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund HG (2002) When is a forest not a forest? J Forest 100:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Madlener R, Robledo C, Muys B, Freja JTB (2006) A sustainability framework for enhancing the long-term success of LULUCF projects. Clim Change 75:241–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neeff T, von Luepke H, Schoene D (2006) Choosing a forest definition for the clean development mechanism. Forests and Climate Change Working Paper 4. FAO, Rome

  • NIMA (National Imagery and Mapping Agency) (1997) VectorMap (VMAP) Level 1. Source: National GeoSpatial Agency, U.S. Dept. of Defense

  • Robledo C, Forner C (2005) Adaptation of forest ecosystems and the forest sector to climate change. Forests and Climate Change Working Paper 2, FAO, Rome, 88 pp

  • Strahler A, Muchoney D, Borak J, Friedl M, Gopal S, Lambin E, Moody A (1999) MODIS Land Cover Product Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) Version 5.0: MODIS Land Cover and Land-Cover Change. Boston University, Boston, MA. p 72. MOD12 v2 data downloaded from: http://www-modis.bu.edu/landcover/userguidelc/index.html

  • Trines E, Höhne N, Jung M, Skutsch M, Petsonk A, Silva-Chavez G, Nabuurs GJ, Verweij P, Schlamadinger B (2006) Integrating agriculture, forestry and other land use in future climate regimes: methodological issues and policy options. Climate Change Scientific Assessment And Policy Analysis: Report 500102 002. Netherlands Programme on Scientific Assessment and Policy Analysis (WAB) Climate Change. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, p 154

  • Tromp H (1976) Der Rechtsbegriff des Waldes. Schweiz Z Forstwesen, Beiheft 39:43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (1997) World atlas of desertification 2ED. UNEP, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCC (2002a) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Held in Marrakech from 29 October–10 November 2001. Addendum Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties, vol I (FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add. 1). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn, Germany

  • UNFCC (2002b) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Held in Marrakech from 29 October–10 November 2001. Addendum Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties, vol II (FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add. 1). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn, Germany

  • USGS (United States Geological Survey) (1993) The global ecosystem land cover characterization database v2.0, was retrieved from http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/glcc/glcc.html. United States Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation System Distributed Active Archive Center. Viewed 2005

  • USGS (United States Geological Survey) (2004) Reprocessing by the GLCF. (1, 3, 30) Arc Second SRTM Elevation, Reprocessed to GeoTIFF, Version 1.0. The Global Land Cover Facility, College Park, Maryland

  • Van Miegroet M (1976) Van Bomen en Bossen. Story Scientia, Gent

    Google Scholar 

  • Verchot LV, Zomer RJ, van Straaten O, Muys B (2007) Implications of country-level decisions on the specification of crown cover in the definition of forests for land area eligible for afforestation and reforestation activities in the CDM. Climatic Change In Press (DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9111-9)

  • WDPA (World Database on Protected Areas) Consortium (2004) World Database on protected areas. World Conservation Union (IUCN) and United Nations Environment Programme – World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), 2004. Source for this dataset was the Global Land Cover Facility: http://glcf.umiacs.umd.edu/

  • Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, van Straaten O, Vercot LV, Muys B (2005) ENCOFOR online analysis tool: implications of forest definition on land area eligible for CDM-AR. Published online: http://csi.cgiar.org/encofor/forest/

  • Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, van Straaten O, Bossio DA (2006) Carbon, land, and water: a global analysis of the hydrologic dimensions of climate change mitigation through afforestation/reforestation. IWMI Research Report 101, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, p 47

Download references

Acknowledgement

Support for this research was provided by a grant from the European Union/EuropeAid (B7-6200/2002/069-203/TPS), by the World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), and the International Water Management Institute (IWMI). This work was conducted within the scope of the ENCOFOR Project, an EU-funded project for the design of sustainable CDM forestry projects (see http://www.joanneum.at/encofor/). We would like to thank institutions leading the work of the ENCOFOR project: KU Leuven (Belgium) and FACE Foundation (Netherlands), Johaneum Institute (Austria) and Country Partners, in Bolivia, Fundación Centro Técnico Forestal (CETEFOR), in Ecuador, Programa Face de Forestación (PROFAFOR), in Kenya, World Agroforestry Center, and in Uganda, Forest Industry Services/Unique Forestry Consultants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Zomer.

Appendix 1: Total area for CDM-AR at specified crown cover density threshold (sq. km)

Appendix 1: Total area for CDM-AR at specified crown cover density threshold (sq. km)

Continent

Sub-Continent

Country

Crown cover density threshold

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Africa

Eastern / Southern Africa

Angola

13813

31591

55371

89295

125045

Burundi

688

2369

6109

10292

13724

Comoros

52

97

162

248

350

Ethiopia

50182

79845

105013

130252

151222

Kenya

5096

13096

22698

28904

33260

Lesotho

2286

4445

5796

7296

7872

Madagascar

83971

135492

197981

232449

246241

Malawi

5328

10293

14810

17578

19251

Mozambique

7813

19471

36068

55574

76412

Rwanda

1031

2499

4979

7224

8795

South Africa

12402

26233

33537

40692

45892

Swaziland

689

1722

2245

2676

3041

Tanzania

12904

30909

50600

67870

82453

Uganda

6695

17686

35983

53862

69266

Zambia

9836

20253

33347

50326

73639

Zimbabwe

570

1360

2458

3425

3995

North Africa

Algeria

5979

7621

8397

9171

10522

Morocco

2501

3041

3233

3423

3639

Tunisia

569

720

821

922

1072

West / Central Africa

Benin

1121

2352

3456

4095

4368

Cameroon

6472

17406

30225

47900

72271

Central African Rep.

1510

5419

12521

28734

55324

Chad

95

310

643

944

1337

Congo

19407

29480

39024

48823

55606

Congo (DRC)

34467

67210

110625

169556

225373

Cote D'Ivoire

4925

16337

32002

54798

82893

Equatorial Guinea

31

55

99

170

268

Gabon

6745

9326

11684

14041

16017

Ghana

6387

18462

35146

56913

74284

Guinea

5024

18854

37195

55767

87650

Guinea-Bissau

1675

2731

4234

5826

8493

Liberia

259

845

2057

3800

6254

Mali

180

561

952

1325

2006

Niger

201

366

444

544

656

Nigeria

43792

96541

147687

197345

239241

Senegal

238

370

496

643

827

Sierra Leone

946

2658

5350

8368

13820

Sudan

686

1981

3827

9877

17636

Togo

2979

8447

14017

18208

20998

Americas

Central America

Antigua & Barbuda

51

93

131

154

184

Barbados

133

196

238

280

298

Belize

239

450

809

1200

1621

Costa Rica

407

874

1784

3353

4935

Cuba

5387

14892

29448

40195

46794

Dominica

10

16

23

27

32

Dominican Rep.

907

2237

4169

6317

8189

El Salvador

460

858

1759

3841

6061

Guatemala

1205

2735

6153

10536

14926

Haiti

2619

5938

9669

12563

14561

Honduras

1159

2616

5658

10573

16435

Jamaica

185

405

794

1174

1511

Mexico

8157

16758

37749

62901

85919

Nicaragua

1980

4356

8392

15582

23173

Panama

676

1888

4679

9409

13779

The Bahamas

659

806

946

1084

1221

South America

Argentina

177729

237016

280902

312411

338887

Bolivia

16807

25416

38847

57049

76785

Brazil

401334

940067

1535620

1965450

2258770

Chile

14580

20209

24662

28000

30893

Colombia

28360

67732

125709

177679

214779

Ecuador

4295

8672

14197

19702

24476

Guyana

6231

9017

10628

11757

12791

Paraguay

8958

18954

34473

48919

63015

Peru

4640

7070

9797

12418

14854

Suriname

307

483

734

986

1200

Trinidad & Tobago

307

449

604

766

887

Uruguay

9937

82188

133681

148896

157127

Venezuela

30498

57813

86738

113168

136643

Asia

East Asia

China

541884

669125

752451

817680

889622

North Korea

20267

24014

26867

27791

28677

South Korea

9608

11781

13092

13790

14641

Northern / Central Asia

Kazakhstan

16282

17425

18012

18520

19049

Kyrgyzstan

17453

17773

17969

18138

18323

Mongolia

1502

2070

2608

3174

3858

Tajikistan

19806

20128

20221

20279

20362

Uzbekistan

4824

4851

4860

4863

4866

South Asia

Bangladesh

24875

27047

28121

28689

29098

Bhutan

53

155

220

271

317

India

314084

416864

486411

525111

558227

Nepal

15314

20762

24896

27939

31343

Sri Lanka

2808

4202

6586

10059

14462

SouthEast Asia

Burma

8122

13110

18555

23621

27605

Cambodia

4429

5680

7294

9147

11759

Indonesia

38649

63746

94896

127811

155272

Laos

990

2420

4768

7177

10027

Malaysia

2453

3692

5282

7231

8961

Philippines

17370

29041

46649

67285

84656

Thailand

9531

18488

29258

39478

48171

Vietnam

12852

20265

29632

38264

45696

Western Asia

Afghanistan

26204

26890

27026

27100

27249

Armenia

6653

7252

7495

7612

7700

Azerbaijan

4293

4871

5143

5312

5419

Cyprus

264

380

425

492

568

Georgia

8551

10282

11211

11716

12180

Iran

2620

3111

3306

3506

3741

Israel

122

168

186

194

203

Lebanon

4613

5312

5611

5809

5995

Pakistan

7018

9734

10636

11071

11926

Syria

3650

4619

5001

5184

5308

Europe

Europe

Albania

10821

15176

17068

18288

19384

Bosnia & Herzegovina

4782

8504

10800

12381

13618

Macedonia

1229

2088

2476

2749

2931

Moldova

11154

13069

14093

15103

15358

Montenegro

1757

2843

3567

4048

4428

Serbia

12415

18680

22594

24935

26557

Oceana

Oceana

Papua New Guinea

3924

5621

7976

11197

14935

Solomon Is.

242

501

640

761

887

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zomer, R.J., Trabucco, A., Verchot, L.V. et al. Land Area Eligible for Afforestation and Reforestation within the Clean Development Mechanism: A Global Analysis of the Impact of Forest Definition. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 13, 219–239 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9087-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9087-4

Keywords

Navigation