Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deep Geological CO2 Storage: Principles Reviewed, and Prospecting for Bio-energy Disposal Sites

  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The principles of hydrocarbon exploration and production provide well-established and tested principles and technologies to investigate storage of fluids in the subsurface. CO2 can be stored in the subsurface using settings of: (A) thick permeable coal seams; (B) depleted oil and gas fields; (C) saline aquifers of regional extent, with an overlying seal. The North Sea Sleipner project shows that CO2 can be injected into the pore space of deep geological aquifers deeper than 800 m at 1 Mt/yr, using established technology. Suitable sediment sequences of saline aquifers exist in all hydrocarbon-producing areas, are volumetrically much larger than exploited oil and gas fields, and hold the potential to easily store all worldwide CO2 emissions until 2050. Geological principles are established to assess entire continents for candidate sites of CO2 storage. This shows that opportunity may be widespread, but needs more specific local investigations. Onshore sub-Saharan Africa is considered the most problematic region – but even here there are potentially viable sediment sequences. No demonstration projects currently exist for CO2 capture and storage using small-scale onshore facilities. A simple estimate, assuming CO2 value of $20 per ton, suggests that single boreholes onshore may be viable over 20 years with supply rates of 100,000 ton CO2 per year. In principle, atmospheric CO2 could be captured by cultivated biomass, and co-fired in existing power stations. Or energy crops could be grown, CO2 to be used, and stored deep below ground, in a country distant from an original fossil-fuel CO2 emission site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arts, R., Chadwick, A. and Eiken, O.: 2004, ‘Recent time-lapse seismic data show no indication of leakage at the sleipner CO2 – Injection site’, in E.S. Rubin, D.W. Keith and C.F. Gilboy (eds.), Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Vol. 1: Peer-Reviewed Papers and Plenary Presentations, IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme, Cheltenham, UK.

  • Bachu, S.: 2001, ‘Geological sequestration of anthropogenic carbon dioxide: Applicability and current issues’, in L.C. Gerhard, W.E. Harrison and B.M. Hanson (eds.), Geological Perspectives of Global Climate Change, Vol. 47, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology, pp. 285–303.

  • Bradshaw, J., Bradshaw, B.E., Allinson, G., Rigg, A.J., Nguyen, V. and Spencer, L.: 2002, ‘The potential for geological sequestration of CO2 in Australia: Preliminary findings and implications to new gas field development’, APPEA 42(1), 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Allinson, G., Bradshaw, B.E., Nguyen, V., Rigg, A.J., Spencer, L. and Wilson, P.: 2003, ‘Australia's CO2 geological storage potential and matching of emission sources to potential sinks’, in J. Gale and Y. Kaya (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 1–4 October 2002, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 633–638.

  • Bradshaw, J. and Dance, T.: 2004, ‘Mapping geological storage prospectivity of CO2 for the world's sedimentary basins and regional source to sink matching’, in E.S. Rubin, D.W. Keith and C.F. Gilboy (eds.), Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vol. 1, Peer-Reviewed Papers and Plenary Presentations, IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme, Cheltenham, UK.

  • Chadwick, R.A., Zweigel, P., Gregersen, U., Kirby, G.A., Holloway, S. and Johannessen, P.N.: 2003, ‘Geological characterization of CO2 storage sites: Lessons from sleipner, Northern North Sea,’ in J. Gale and Y. Kaya (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 1–4 October 2002, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 321–326.

  • DTI: 2003, Energy white paper. Our Energy Future – Creating a Low Carbon Economy The Stationery Office, London. ISBN 0-10-157612-9.

  • DTI: 2005, A Strategy for Developing Carbon Abatement Technologies for Fossil Fuel Use, 05/844 The Stationery Office, London.

  • Espie, A., Brand, P.J., Skinner, R.C., Hubbard, R.A. and Turan, H.I. et al.: 2003, ‘Obstacles to the storage of CO2 through EOR operations in the North Sea’, in J. Gale and Y. Kaya (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 1–4 October 2002, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 213–218.

  • Ennis-King, J. and Paterson, L.: 2003, ‘Rate of dissolution due to convective mixing in the underground storage of carbon dioxide’, in J. Gale and Y. Kaya (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 1–4 October 2002, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 507–510.

  • Holloway, S., Heederik, J.P., van der Meer, L.G.H., Czernichowski-Lauriol, I., Harrison, R., Lindeberg, E., Summerfield, I.R., Rochelle, C., Schwarzkopf, T., Kaarstad, O. and Berger, B.: 1996, The underground disposal of carbon dioxide, Joule II Project No CT92-0031, Final Report. British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK.

  • IPCC: 2001, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Third Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press.

  • Jenkins, D.A.L.: 2001, ‘Potential impacts and effects of climate change’, in L.C. Gerhard, W.E. Harrison and B.M. Hanson (eds.), Geologic Perspectives of Global Climate Change. Studies in Geology, Vol. 47, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, pp. 337-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder: 2004, Kinder Morgan pipeline company dominates the USA supply. www.kindermorgan.com.

  • Kovscek, A.R.: 2002, ‘Screening criteria for CO2 storage in oil reservoirs’, Journal of Petrol Science and Technology 20, 841–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, F.M.: 2004, Storage of carbon dioxide in geologic formations. Society Petroleum Engineers 88842.

  • Read, P. and Lermit, J.: 2004, ‘Bio-energy with carbon storage (BECS): A sequential decision approach to the threat of abrupt climate change’, Energy 30, 2654–2671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, G.W., Celia, M.A., Prévost, J.H., Bachu, S., Bruant, R., Duguid, A., Fuller, R.C., Gasda, S.E., Radonjic, M. and Vichit-Vadakan, W.: 2005, ‘Leakage of CO2 through abandoned wells: Role of corrosion of cement’, in D.C. Thomas and S.M. Benson (eds.), The CO 2 Capture and Storage Project (CCP), Vol. II, Elsevier Ltd., pp. 823–844.

  • Shaw, J. and Bachu, S.: 2002, ‘Screening, evaluation, and ranking of oil reservoirs suitable for CO2-flood EOR and carbon dioxide sequestration’, J. Canad. Petrol Tech. 41, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainforth, D.A., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Collins, M., Faull, N., Frame, D.J., Kettleborough, J.A., Knight, S., Martin, A., Murphy, J.M., Piani, C., Sexton, D., Smith, L.A., Spicer, R.A., Thorpe, A.J. and Allen, M.R.: 2005, ‘Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases’, Nature 433, 403–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torp, T.A. and Brown, K.R.: 2004, ‘CO2 underground storage costs as experienced at Sleipner and Weyburn’, in E.S. Rubin, D.W. Keith and C.F. Gilboy (eds.), Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Vol. 1, Peer-Reviewed Papers and Plenary Presentations, IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme, Cheltenham, UK.

  • Torp, T.A. and Gale, J.: 2003, ‘Demonstrating storage of CO2 in geological reservoirs: The sleipner and SACS Projects’, in J. Gale and Y. Kaya (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 1–4 October 2002, Kyoto, Japan pp. 311–316.

  • USGS: 1997, Open File Report 97-470A, version 2.0 2002 Map showing geology, oil and gas fields and geologic provinces of Africa, Compiled By Feliks Persits, Thomas Ahlbrandt, Michele Tuttle, Ronald Charpentier, Michael Brownfield, Kenneth Takahashi.

  • USGS: 1997, Open-File Report 97-470C version 2.0 Maps Showing Geology, Oil And Gas Fields And Geologic Provinces Of South Asia by Craig J. Wandrey and Ben E. Law.

  • USGS: 1997, Open-File Report 97-470D Maps Showing Geology, Oil And Gas Fields And Geologic Provinces Of The South America Region. Compiled by Christopher J. Schenk, Roland J. Viger, and Christopher P. Anderson.

  • USGS: 1997, Open-File Report 97-470F Maps Showing Geology, Oil And Gas Fields, And Geologic Provinces Of The Asia Pacific Region Compiled by Douglas W. Steinshouer, Jin Qiang, Peter J. McCabe, and Robert T. Ryder.

  • USGS: 1997, Open File Report 97-470I Map Showing Geology, Oil and Gas Fields, and Geologic Provinces of Europe including Turkey Compiled by Mark J. Pawlewicz Douglas W. Steinshouer and Donald L. Gautier.

  • van der Meer, L.G.H., Hartman, J., Geel, C. and Kreft E.: ‘Re-Injecting CO2 into an offshore gas reservoir at a depth of nearly 4000 metres sub sea’, in E.S. Rubin, D.W. Keith and C.F. Gilboy (eds.), Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vol. 1: Peer-Reviewed Papers and Plenary Presentations, IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme, Cheltenham, UK.

  • Webb, III, T.: 1991, ‘The spectrum of temporal climatic variability’, in R.S. Bradley (ed.), Global Change of the Past. Office of Interdisciplinary Earth Studies, Boulder Colorado, pp. 61–81.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Stuart Haszeldine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haszeldine, R.S. Deep Geological CO2 Storage: Principles Reviewed, and Prospecting for Bio-energy Disposal Sites. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11, 377–401 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9005-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9005-6

Keywords

Navigation