Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement System Based on Nonrecursive Filters with the Optimal Correction of the Dynamic Measurement Error

  • GENERAL ISSUES OF METROLOGY AND MEASURING EQUIPMENT
  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

This article reviews the publications on the theory of dynamic measurements. The problem of minimizing the dynamic measurement error, whose components are due to the dynamic properties (inertia) of the sensor and additive noise at its output, is discussed. To solve this problem, a method is proposed for minimizing the dynamic measurement error as a result of the simultaneous correction of the specified components, and the structure of the measurement system is developed. The measurement system evaluates the dynamic measurement error and reduces it through a simultaneous restoration and filtering of the input measured signal of the sensor. The structure of a special filter with the preliminary correction of the transfer function of the sensor for the further processing of the measured signal is proposed. The processing of the dynamic measurement error consists of the iterative application of a finite impulse restoring filter (or nonrecursive filter) and estimation of the dynamic error. The computer simulation of the developed measurement system was performed for the second-order sensor. The optimal (in terms of the minimum estimate of the dynamic error) values of the order of the restoring filter for the input signals of various types in the presence of an additive Gaussian noise at the sensor output were obtained. The reduction of the dynamic error with the use of the developed measurement system is demonstrated. The obtained results can be used in measuring the parameters of rapidly varying processes when the dynamic component of the error is dominant, which is due to the dynamic properties (inertia) of the sensor and additive noise at its output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Interstate standardization recommendations 29-2013. State System for Ensuring Uniform Measurement. Metrology. Basic terms and definitions.

References

  1. J. P. Hessling, Meas. Sci. Technol., 19, No. 7, 075101 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/7/075101.

  2. J. P. Hessling, Meas. Sci. Technol., 19, No. 8, 084008 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/8/084008.

  3. J. P. Hessling, Meas. Sci. Technol., 20, No. 5, 055106 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/5/055106.

  4. I. Kollar, P. Osvath, and W. S. Zaengl, Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Int. Symp. on Electrical Insulation, Cambridge, MA, USA, June 5–8 (1988), pp. 359–363, https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINSL.1988.13941.

  5. R. Vester, M. Percin, and B. van Oudheusden, Meas. Sci. Technol., 27, No. 9, 095302 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/9Z095302.

  6. R. Neelamani, H. Choi, and R. Baraniuk, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 52, No. 2, 418–433 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2003.821103.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. X. A. Shen and G. G. Walter, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 23, Nos. 1–2, 195–215 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1081/NFA-120003678.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Fan and J.-Y. Koo, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 48, No. 3, 734–747 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1109/18.986021.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Qian, Appl. Math. Comput., 203, No. 2, 635–640 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2008.05.009.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Dichev, H. Koev, T. Bakalova, and P. Louda, Meas. Sci. Rev., 14, No. 4, 183–189 (2014), https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2014-0025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Dichev, H. Koev, T. Bakalova, and P. Louda, J. Theor. Appl. Mech., 44, No. 1, 3–20 (2014), https://doi.org/10.2478/jtam-2014-0001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Dichev, H. Koev, T. Bakalova, and P. Louda, Meas. Sci. Rev., 15, No. 1, 19–26 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2015-0004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Dichev, H. Koev, T. Bakalova, and P. Louda, Metrol. Meas. Syst., 23, No. 4, 555–565 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1515/mms-2016-0041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Dichev, I. Zhelezarov, D. Diakov, H. Nikolova, and R. Miteva, 2019 XXIX Int. Sci. Symp. "Metrology and Metrology Assurance" (MMA) Proceedings, Sozopol, Bulgaria, September 6–9 (2019), pp. 01–04, https://doi.org/10.1109/MMA.2019.8936039.

  15. G. B. Rossi, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 61, No. 8, 2097–2106 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2012.2197071.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. G. B. Rossi, 2015 IEEE Int. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf. (I2MTC) Proceedings, Pisa, Italy, May 11–14 (2015), pp. 1516–1521, https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2015.7151503.

  17. B. Saggin, S. Debei, and M. Zaccariotto, Measurement, 30, No. 3, 223–230 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2241(01)00015-X.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. L. Shestakov, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 45, No. 1, 250–255 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1109/19.481342.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. L. Shestakov, Adv. Math. Comput. Tools Metrol. Testing X, Ser. Adv. Math. Appl. Sci., 86, 66–77 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814678629_0008.

  20. A. L. Shestakov, ACTA IMEKO, 8, No. 1, 64–76 (2019), https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v8i1.568.

  21. E. V. Yurasova, M. N. Biziaev, and A. S. Volosnikov, Proc. Eng., 129, 764–769 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. E. V. Yurasova, M. N. Bizyaev, and A. S. Volosnikov, Bull. South Ural State Univ. Ser. Comput. Technol., Automatic Control, Radio Electron., 16, No. 1, 64–80 (2015), https://doi.org/10.14529/ctcr160106.

  23. A. S. Volosnikov and A. L. Shestakov, ACTA IMEKO, 5, No. 3, 24–31 (2016), https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v5i3.294.

  24. M. N. Bizyaev and A. S. Volosnikov, Adv. Math. Comput. Tools Metrol. Testing X, Ser. Adv. Math. Appl. Sci., 89, 153– 161 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813274303_0012.

  25. E. V. Yurasova and A. S. Volosnikov, Adv. Math. Comput. Tools Metrol. Testing X, Ser. Adv. Math. Appl. Sci., 89, 427– 438 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813274303_0043.

  26. G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell, and M. L. Workman, Digital Control of Dynamic Systems (3rd Ed.), Addison-Wesley (1998).

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Chelyabinsk Region within the regional project of the fundamental and applied scientific research No. 20-48-740022 r_a_Chelyabinsk "Regularization methods for processing noisy data in multichannel measuring systems."

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Volosnikov.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 10, pp. 19–25, October, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volosnikov, A.S. Measurement System Based on Nonrecursive Filters with the Optimal Correction of the Dynamic Measurement Error. Meas Tech 65, 720–728 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-023-02144-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-023-02144-6

Keywords

Navigation