Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experiential knowledge in clinical medicine: use and justification

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the evidence-based medicine (EBM) construct, clinical expertise is acknowledged to be both derived from primary experience and necessary for optimal medical practice. Primary experience in medical practice, however, remains undervalued. Clinicians’ primary experience tends to be dismissed by EBM as unsystematic or anecdotal, a source of bias rather than knowledge, never serving as the “best” evidence to support a clinical decision. The position that clinical expertise is necessary but that primary experience is untrustworthy in clinical decision-making is epistemically incoherent. Here we argue for the value and utility of knowledge gained from primary experience for the practice of medicine. Primary experience provides knowledge necessary to diagnose, treat, and assess response in individual patients. Hierarchies of evidence, when advanced as guides for clinical decisions, mistake the relationship between propositional and experiential knowledge. We argue that primary experience represents a kind of medical knowledge distinct from the propositional knowledge produced by clinical research, both of which are crucial to determining the best diagnosis and course of action for particular patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sackett, David L., William M.C. Rosenberg, J.A. Muir Gray, R. Brian Haynes, and W. Scott Richardson. 1996. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312: 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blunt, Christopher. 2015. Hierarchies of evidence in evidence-based medicine. Doctoral Dissertation, London School of Economics. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3284.

  3. Howick, Jeremy. 2011. The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guyatt, Gordon H., Andrew D. Oxman, Gunn E. Vist, Regina Kunz, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Pablo Alonso-Coello, and Holger J. Schünemann. 2008. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336: 924–926.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laudan, Laurens. 1968. Theories of scientific method from Plato to Mach: A bibliographical review. History of Science 7: 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Popper, Karl. 2002. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bogen, James. 2017. Theory and observation in science. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2017, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/science-theory-observation.

  8. Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wieringa, Sietse, and Trisha Greenhalgh. 2015. 10 years of mindlines: A systematic review and commentary. Implementation Science 10: 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0229-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fantl, Jeremy. 2017. Knowledge how. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Fall 2017, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/knowledge-how.

  11. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. 1992. Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268: 2420–2425.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Polanyi, Michael. 1962. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henry, Stephen G. 2006. Recognizing tacit knowledge in medical epistemology. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27: 187–213.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Braude, Hillel D. 2012. Intuition in medicine: A philosophical defense of clinical reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shapiro, Devora. 2012. “Objectivity” and the arbitration of experiential knowledge. Social Philosophy Today 28: 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Croskerry, Pat. 2013. From mindless to mindful practice—Cognitive bias and clinical decision making. New England Journal of Medicine 368: 2445–2448.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goold, Susan Dorr. 2002. Trust, distrust and trustworthiness: Lessons from the field. Journal of General Internal Medicine 17: 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Longino, Helen E. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tonelli, Mark R. 1999. In defense of expert opinion. Academic Medicine 74: 1187–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Solomon, Miriam. 2015. Making medical knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gøtzsche, Peter C., and John P.A. Ioannidis. 2012. Content experts as authors: Helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses? BMJ 345: e7031. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krauss, Alexander. 2018. Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results. Annals of Medicine 50: 312–322.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Worrall, John. 2002. What evidence in evidence-based medicine? Philosophy of Science 69: S316–S330.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cartwright, Nancy. 2011. The philosopher’s view of the long road from RCTs to effectiveness. Lancet 377: 1400–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Engebretsen, Eivind, Kristin Heggen, Sietse Wieringa, and Trisha Greenhalgh. 2016. Uncertainty and objectivity in clinical decision making: A clinical case in emergency medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19: 595–603.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Norman, Geoffrey. 2005. Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education 39: 418–427.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Custers, Eugène J.F.M. 2015. Thirty years of illness scripts: Theoretical origins and practical applications. Medical Teacher 37: 457–462.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Greenhalgh, Trisha. 1999. Narrative based medicine in an evidence based world. BMJ 318: 323–325.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reed, Edward. 1996. The necessity of experience. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bowen, Judith L. 2006. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. New England Journal of Medicine 355: 2217–2225.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Norman, Geoffrey. 2006. Building on experience—The development of clinical reasoning. New England Journal of Medicine 355: 2251–2252.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guyatt, Gordon, and Drummond Rennie. 2002. Users’ guides to the medical literature. Chicago: AMA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sackett, David L., Sharon E. Strauss, W. Scott Richardson, William Rosenberg, and R. Brian Hayes. 2000. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM, 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tonelli, Mark R. 1998. The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Academic Medicine 73: 234–240.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Montgomery, Kathryn. 2006. How doctors think: Clinical judgment and the practice of medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stolper, Erik, Paul van Royen, and Geert Jan Dinant. 2010. The “sense of alarm” (“gut feeling”) in clinical practice: A survey among European general practitioners on recognition and expression. European Journal of General Practice 16: 72–74.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wiswell, Jeffrey, Kenyon Tsao, M. Fernanda Bellolio, Erik P. Hess, and Daniel Cabrera. 2013. “Sick” or “not-sick”: Accuracy of System 1 diagnostic reasoning for the prediction of disposition and acuity in patients presenting to an academic ED. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 31: 1448–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Radtke, Anne, Roman Pfister, Kathrin Kuhr, Matthias Kochanek, and Guido Michels. 2017. Is “gut feeling” by medical staff better than validated scores in estimation of mortality in a medical intensive care unit?—The prospective FEELING-ON-ICU study. Journal of Critical Care 41: 204–208.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sibbald, Matthew, Jonathan Sherbino, Ian Preyra, Tara Coffin-Simpson, Geoff Norman, and Sandra Monteiro. 2017. Eyeballing: The use of visual appearance to diagnose “sick”. Medical Education 51: 1138–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Knaus, William A., Frank E. Harrell, Joanne Lynn, Lee Goldman, Russell S. Phillips, Alfred F. Connors, Neal V. Dawson, et al. 1995. The SUPPORT prognostic model: Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Annals of Internal Medicine 122: 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sinuff, Tasnim, Neill K.J. Adhikari, Deborah J. Cook, Holger J. Schünemann, Lauren E. Griffith, Graeme Rocker, and Stephen D. Walter. 2006. Mortality predictions in the intensive care unit: Comparing physicians with scoring systems. Critical Care Medicine 34: 878–885.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Street Jr., Richard L., Gregory Makoul, Neeraj K. Arora, and Ronald M. Epstein. 2009. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling 74: 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sullivan, Mark D. 1993. Placebo controls and epistemic control in orthodox medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18: 213–231.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cassell, Erik J. 2013. The nature of healing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Andersen, Holly. 2012. Mechanisms: What are they evidence for in evidence-based medicine? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18: 992–999.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Glover, Jan, David Izzo, Karen Odato, and Lei Wang. 2008. EBM pyramid and EBM page generator. Dartmouth University and Yale University.

  47. Tonelli, Mark R. 2006. Integrating evidence into clinical practice: An alternative to evidence-based approaches. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12: 248–256.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Greenhalgh, Trisha. 2018. Of lamp posts, keys, and fabled drunkards: A perspectival tale of 4 guidelines. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24: 1132–1138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 356522, Seattle, WA, 98195-6522, USA

    Mark R. Tonelli

  2. Southern Oregon University, Ashland, OR, USA

    Devora Shapiro

Authors
  1. Mark R. Tonelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Devora Shapiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Tonelli.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tonelli, M.R., Shapiro, D. Experiential knowledge in clinical medicine: use and justification. Theor Med Bioeth 41, 67–82 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09521-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09521-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation