Abstract
The term “community” in ethics and bioethics traditionally has been used to designate either a specific kind of moral relationship available to rational agents or, in contrast, the context in which any sense of rational agency can even be understood. I argue that bioethics is better served when both “selves” and “community” are expressed through a more processive language that highlights the functional character of such concepts. In particular, I see the turn to “processive” community in bioethics as a turn towards method, contextualization, and narrative. In clinical practice, such a processive account demands that bioethics concentrate on methods of developing healthy dialogue and deeper understanding from within the problematic situation rather than trying to “fix” problems using ethical tools developed from outside the present situation. “Community,” I argue, is in and of the interactive processes of inquiry itself. Such inquiry, such “communitying,” requires that we engage individual patients in context; it demands more than simply gaining their permission or mere consent; it demands developing a supportive environment for participation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J Andre (2002) Bioethics As Practice. The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill, NC
A. Buchanan (1995) “Community Communitarianism” E. Craig (Eds) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Routledge London
A. Caplan (1997) ArticleTitle“Communitarian Bioethics: Reasons for Pessimism” Responsive Community 7 93–95
J. Dewey (1985) “How We Think” J. Boydston (Eds) In The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Vol. 6. Southern Illinois University Press Carbondale 177–356
J. Dewey (1985) Democracy and Education J. Boydston (Eds) The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Vol. 9 Southern Illinois University Press Carbondale
J. Dewey (1988) Democracy and Education J. Boydston (Eds) The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 12 Southern Illinois University Press Carbondale
E.J Emanuel (1992) The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
H.T Engelhardt SuffixJr. (1996) The Foundations of Bioethics EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press New York
D.M Hester (2001) Community As Healing: Pragmatist Ethics in Medical Encounters. Rowman & Littlefield Lanham, MD
D.M. Hester (2002) ArticleTitleNarrative as bioethics: The “fact” of social selves and the function of consensus. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 17–26
J.K.A Kegley (1997) Genuine Individuals and Genuine Communities. Vanderbilt University Press Nashville
M.G. Kuczewski (1997) “Bioethics’ Consensus on Method: Who Could ask for Anything More?” H.L. Nelson (Eds) Stories and Their Limits Routledge London 134–149
E.H Loewy (1997) Moral Stranger, Moral Acquaintances, and Moral Friends. SUNY Press Albany, NY
A MacIntyre (1984) After Virtue EditionNumber2 University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, IN
G.H Mead (1934) Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
J.D Moreno (1996) Deciding Together: Bioethics and Moral Consensus. Oxford University Press New York
B. Nicholas (1999) “Strategies for Effective Transformation” A. Donchin L.M. Purdy (Eds) Embodying Bioethics: Recent Feminist Advances Rowman & Littlefield Lanham, MD 239–252
C.S. Peirce (1932) “Some Consequences of Four Capacities” C. Hartshorne P. Weiss (Eds) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2 Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
S. Sherwin (1992) “Feminist and Medical Ethics: Two Different Approaches to Contextual Ethics” H.B. Holmes L. M. Purdy (Eds) Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics Indiana University Press Bloomington, IN 17–31
C. Strong (1997) ArticleTitle“Is There No Common Morality?” Medical Humanities Review 11 39–45
Kevin Wm Wildes (2000) Moral Acquaintances. University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, IN
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hester, D.M. What Must We Mean By “Community”? A Processive Account. Theor Med Bioeth 25, 423–437 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-004-4011-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-004-4011-3