Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Waste and Alternative Fuels on Blast-Furnace Operation

  • Published:
Metallurgist Aims and scope

Ninety-eight percent of the pig iron produced in the world is made in blast furnaces. Pig-iron smelting is presently being impacted by a serious shortage of coking coals. Moreover, the production of coke used in the smelting operation has an adverse effect on the environment. One method of partially replacing coke in the smelting operation is to inject hydrocarbons into the blast furnace. The injection of hydrocarbon through the tuyeres alters the mass- and heat-transfer conditions inside the furnace and increases the volume and hydrogen content of the hearth gases and top gases. The hydrogen content of the gases depends on the value of the C/H2 ratio in the fuel that is injected. All these changes decrease the amount of direct reduction that iron undergoes in the furnace. This article presents results from model calculations that took into account the complex effect of injected hydrocarbons on reduction and heat exchange in a blast furnace. The models were used to quantitatively estimate the amount of reduction that takes place and to determine the value of a coefficient which characterizes the replacement of coke by injected fuel. The calculations that were performed make it possible to predict changes in coke consumption in a blast furnace when it is injected with liquid hydrocarbons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Babich, D. Senk, H. W. Gudenau, and K. Th. Mawrommatis, Ironmaking, RWTH Aachen University. Aachen (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. G. Lisienko, A. V. Lapteva, and Yu. N. Chesnokov, “Comparative ecological and greenhouse analysis of alternative coke-less processes for making pig iron and steel,” Metallurgist, 55, No. 7–8, 471–477 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Pustejovska, S. Brozova, S. Jursova, “Environmental benefits of coke consumption decrease,” Metal 2010: 19th Int. Conf. on Metallurgy and Materials, May 18–20, 2010, Roznov pod Radhostem, Czech Republic, Tanger, spol. s r. o., Ostrava, ISBN 978-80-87294-17-8, pp. 79–83.

  4. S. Jursova, “Metallurgical waste and possibilities of Its processing,” ibid, pp. 115–120.

  5. J. Bilík, “Analytical models of blast furnace operation in current metallurgical industry,” Hutnické Listy, LIV, No. 7–8, 13–16 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Sousek, Analysis of Injection of Hydrocarbon Fuels Results on Base Blast Furnace Energy Balance: Master’s Thesis [in Chech], VSB – TU, Ostrava (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Jursova.

Additional information

Translated from Metallurg, No. 12, pp. 38–40, December, 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pustejovska, P., Jursova, S., Brozova, S. et al. Effect of Waste and Alternative Fuels on Blast-Furnace Operation. Metallurgist 56, 908–911 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-013-9673-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-013-9673-5

Keywords

Navigation