Skip to main content
Log in

Low Reynolds unsteady flow simulation around NACA0012 airfoil with active flow control

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research numerically elucidates the effects of suction and blowing on the enhancement of unsteady aerodynamic characteristics of flows and their corresponding impact on stall delay over the well-known NACA0012 airfoil at various angles of attack (\( 12 \le {\text{AOA}} \le 20 \)) under low Reynolds numbers. For this purpose, an in-house solver written in C++ is developed. The numerical code utilizes the Jameson’s cell-centered finite volume numerical method accompanied by a progressive power-law preconditioning approach to suppress the stiffness of the governing equations. Many numerical simulations are performed over the suction-blowing control parameters, namely, the slot location (\( L_{j} \)), suction/blowing amplitudes (\( A_{j} \)), and suction/blowing angle (\( \theta_{j} \)). Most of the analyses are based on the measurements of the unsteady aerodynamic characteristics behaviors (such as lift, drag, moment coefficients, and stall phenomena) over the airfoil. The numerical results confirm that the unsteady behavior of the flow (vortex shedding) is weakened or approximately removed when suction is used, especially near the leading edge. In all of the test cases, the ratio of the average lift coefficient to the average drag coefficient increases with increasing suction and blowing amplitudes, except in the case of perpendicular blowing. Furthermore, the blowing is more sensitive to the blowing angle compared to the suction. From the suction and blowing results, it is concluded that the former has a more positive impact on the lift and drag characteristics, especially in the case of incompressible flow at Low-Reynolds regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall J (2007) Low Reynolds number aerodynamics for micro aerial vehicles. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Colorado at Boulder

  2. Thake MP Jr (2011) Investigation of a Laminar airfoil with flow control and the effect of Reynolds number. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University

  3. Gregory N, Walker W (1958) Experiments on the use of suction through perforated strips for maintaining laminar flow: transition and drag measurements. Tech report, Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, no. 3083

  4. Cumming R, Gregory N, Walker W (1950) An investigation of the use of an auxiliary slot to re-establish Laminar flow on low-drag aerofoils. Tech report, Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, no. 2742

  5. Burrows DL, Schwartzberg MA (1952) Experimental investigation of an NACA 64A010 airfoil section with 41 suction slots on each surface for control of Laminar boundary layer. Tech report, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington DC, no. 2644

  6. Anderson G, Murthy V, Sutera S (1969) Laminar boundary-layer control by combined blowing and suction in the presence of surface roughness. J Hydronaut 3(3):145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang L, Huang P, LeBeau R, Hauser T (2004) Numerical study of blowing and suction control mechanism on NACA0012 airfoil. J Aircr 41(5):1005–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rullan JM, Vlachos PP, Telionis DP, Zeiger MD (2006) Post-stall flow control of sharp-edged wings via unsteady blowing. J Aircr 43(6):1738–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yousefi K, Saleh R, Zahedi P (2013) Numerical study of flow separation control by tangential and perpendicular blowing on the NACA 0012 airfoil. Int J Eng 7(1):10–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yousefi K, Saleh R (2014) The effects of trailing edge blowing on aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil and optimization of the blowing slot geometry. J Theor Appl Mech 52(1):165–179

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chorin AJ (1997) A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems. J Comput Phys 135(2):118–125

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Turkel E (1987) Preconditioned methods for solving the incompressible and low speed compressible equations. J Comput Phys 72(2):277–298

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Leer B, Lee WT, Roe PL (1991) Characteristic time-stepping or local preconditioning of the Euler equations. In: AIAA 10th computational fluid dynamics conference, University of Michigan, Honolulu, HI, 24–27 June, pp 260–282

  14. Lee D (1996) Local preconditioning of the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan

  15. Malan A, Lewis R, Nithiarasu P (2002) An improved unsteady, unstructured, artificial compressibility, finite volume scheme for viscous incompressible flows: part I. Theory and implementation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 54(5):695–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Malan A, Lewis R, Nithiarasu P (2002) An improved unsteady, unstructured, artificial compressibility, finite volume scheme for viscous incompressible flows: part II. Application. Int J Numer Methods Eng 54(5):715–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Esfahanian V, Akbarzadeh P (2010) Local pressure preconditioning method for steady incompressible flows. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 24(5):169–186

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Esfahanian V, Akbarzadeh P, Hejranfar K (2012) An improved progressive preconditioning method for steady non-cavitating and sheet-cavitating flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 68(2):210–232

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Akbarzadeh P, Akbarzadeh E (2016) Hydrodynamic characteristics of blowing and suction on sheet-cavitating flows around hydrofoils. Ocean Eng 114:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jameson A (1982) Steady state solution of the Euler equations for transonic flow. In: Proceeding of transonic, shock and multidimensional flows. Academic Press, New York, pp 37–69

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E (1981) Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge–Kutta time-stepping schemes. In: AIAA 14th fluid and plasma dynamics conference, Palo Alto, CA, 23–25 June

  22. Jameson A (1991) Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flow past airfoils and wings. In: AIAA 10th computational fluid dynamics conference, Honolulu, HI, 24–27 June

  23. Belov A, Martinelli L, Jameson A (1995) A new implicit algorithm with multigrid for unsteady incompressible flow calculations. In: 33rd aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 9–12 Jan

  24. Akbarzadeh P, Askari Lehdarboni A, Derazgisoo SM (2018) A new smoothing approach for accelerating the convergence of power-Law preconditioning method in steady and unsteady flows simulation. Int J Mech Sci 141:316–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Melson ND, Sanetrik MD, Atkins HL (1993) Time-accurate Navier–Stokes calculations with multigrid acceleration. In: Proceeding of the 6th copper mountain conference on multigrid methods, Colorado, 4–9 April, pp 423–439

  26. Hafez M, Shatalov A, Nakajima M (2007) Improved numerical simulations of incompressible flows based on viscous/inviscid interaction procedures. Comput Fluids 36(10):1588–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shatalov AV (2006) Numerical simulations of incompressible laminar flows using viscous-inviscid interaction procedures. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis

  28. Zhou Y, Alam Mahbub Md, Yang HX, Guo H, Wood DH (2011) Fluid forces on a very low Reynolds number airfoil and their prediction. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 32(1):329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Shahrood University of Technology for supporting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Akbarzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akbarzadeh, P., Askari Lehdarboni, A. & Derazgisoo, S.M. Low Reynolds unsteady flow simulation around NACA0012 airfoil with active flow control. Meccanica 53, 3457–3476 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-0898-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-0898-z

Keywords

Navigation