Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An improved design method for the dimensional synthesis of flexure-based compliant mechanisms: optimization procedure and experimental validation

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monolithic Flexure-based Compliant Mechanisms (MFCM) can be used to conceive nonlinear springs with a desired load-displacement profile at one point of their structure. For a given MFCM topology, these particular springs can be conveniently dimensioned by resorting to the well-known Pseudo-Rigid-Body approximation, whose accuracy strongly depends on the modelling precision of the flexures’ principal compliance. For various types of flexures, closed-form solutions have been proposed, which express the compliance factors as functions of the flexure dimensions. Nonetheless, the accuracy of these relations is limited to slender, beam-like hinges undergoing rather small deflections. In order to overcome such limitations, this paper provides empirical equations, derived from finite element analysis, that can be used for the optimal dimensioning of circular, elliptical, and corner-filleted flexural hinges with general aspect ratios, on the basis of both principal compliance and maximum bearable stress. At first, an accuracy comparison with previously published results is provided. Then, as a case study, a nonlinear spring based on a double slider-crank MFCM and with a desired load-displacement profile is dimensioned and verified via finite element analysis. The corresponding MFCM prototype, produced by means of water jet cutting, is finally tested on a tensile stage. Both numerical and experimental results confirm that the aforementioned empirical equations outperform the closed-form solutions provided in the past literature when modelling thick cross-section hinges undergoing significant deflections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Howell L (2001) Compliant mechanisms. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen S, Wang M (2007) Designing distributed compliant mechanisms with characteristic stiffness. ASME IDETC Conf Proc 2007:33–45

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berselli G, Vertechy R, Vassura G, Castelli VP (2011) Optimal synthesis of conically-shaped dielectric elastomer linear actuators: design methodology and experimental validation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 16(1):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mammano GS, Dragoni E (2011) Increasing stroke and output force of linear shape memory actuators by elastic compensation. Mechatronics 21(3):570–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rhoads JF, Shaw SW, Turner KL, Baskaran R (2005) Tunable microelectromechanical filters that exploit parametric resonance. ASME J Vib Acoust 127(5):423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Palli G, Berselli G, Melchiorri C, Vassura G (2011) Design of a variable stiffness actuator based on flexures. ASME Trans J Mech Robot 3(3):034501(5)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Howell LL, Midha A, Murphy MD (1994) Dimensional synthesis of compliant constant-force slider mechanisms. Mach Elem Mach Dyn DE 71:509–515

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nahar D, Sugar T (2003) Compliant constant-force mechanism with a variable output for micro/macro applications. IEEE ICRA Int Conf Robot Autom 1:318–323

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jutte CV, Kota S (2008) Design of nonlinear springs for prescribed load-displacement functions. J Mech Des 130(8):081403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Howell LL, Midha A (1995) Parametric deflection approximations for end-loaded, large-deflection beams in compliant mechanisms. J Mech Des 117(1):156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Timoshenko S (1976) Strength of materials. Krieger Publishing Company, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Su H-J (2008) A load independent pseudo-rigid-body 3R model for determining large deflection of beams in compliant mechanisms. ASME Conf Proc 2008(43260):109–121

  13. Paros J, Weisbord L (1965) How to design flexure hinge. Mach Des 37(27):151–156

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith ST et al (1997) Elliptical flexure hinges. Rev Sci Instrum 68(3):1474–1483

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lobontiu N, Paine J, Garcia E, Goldfarb M (2001) Corner-filleted flexure hinges. J Mech Des 123(3):346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lobontiu N, Paine J, Garcia E, Goldfarb M (2002) Design of symmetric conic-section flexure hinges based on closed-form compliance equations. Mech Mach Theory 37:477–498

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen G, Liu X, Du Y (2011) Elliptical-arc-fillet flexure hinges: toward a generalized model for commonly used flexure hinges. J Mech Des 133(8):081002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zettl B, Szyszkowski W, Zhang WJ (2004) On systematic errors of two-dimensional finite element modeling of right circular planar flexure hinges. J Mech Des 127(4):782–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zettl B, Szyszkowski W, Zhang WJ (2004) Accurate low DOF modeling of a planar complaint mechanism with flexure hinges: the equivalent beam methodology. Precis Eng 1:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yong YK, Lu T, Handley D (2008) Review of circular flexure hinge design equations and derivation of empirical formulations. Precis Eng 32:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schotborgh W, Kokkeler F, Trager H, Houten FV (2005) Dimensionless design graphs for flexure elements and a comparison between three flexure elements. Precis Eng 29:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lobontiu N (2002) Compliant mechanisms: design of flexure hinges. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Meng Q, Li Y, Xu J (2013) New empirical stiffness equations for corner-filleted flexure hinges. Mech Sci 4:345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Björk A (1996) Numerical methods for least squares problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen G, Jia J, Han Q, Wang Y (2005) Performance optimization of elliptical flexure hinge using a modified particle swarm algorithm. IEEE ICIT Int Conf Ind Technol 2005:1180–1185

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tseytlin Y (2002) Notch flexure hinges: an effective theory. Rev Sci Instrum 73(9):3363–3368

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università di Genova, Via allOpera Pia 15/A, Genova, Italy

    Giovanni Berselli

  2. University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

    Qiaoling Meng

  3. Università di Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, Bologna, Italy

    Rocco Vertechy & Vincenzo Parenti Castelli

Authors
  1. Giovanni Berselli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiaoling Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rocco Vertechy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vincenzo Parenti Castelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rocco Vertechy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berselli, G., Meng, Q., Vertechy, R. et al. An improved design method for the dimensional synthesis of flexure-based compliant mechanisms: optimization procedure and experimental validation. Meccanica 51, 1209–1225 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0276-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0276-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation