Skip to main content
Log in

Joint force decomposition and variation in unified inverse dynamics analysis of a metamorphic parallel mechanism

  • Recent Progress and Novel Applications of Parallel Mechanisms
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a unified inverse kinematics and dynamics model of a metamorphic parallel mechanism with pure rotation and pure translation phases. By altering one rotation axis of the reconfigurable Hooke (rT) joints in the limbs, the mechanism can be switched into one of the two phases. To provide joint reaction forces for optimal design and control, Newton method is used in developing the dynamics model which is unified by combining geometric constraints and parameters in both phases. An analytical investigation provides special joint force decomposition and limb coordinate setup to decouple the dynamics equations between the platform and the limbs. This reduces the dynamics computation load from solving a 15 × 15 matrix to a 6 × 6 matrix. A numerical example is given to illustrate the proposed method and simulation results are explained and compared between the two phases. The work on this paper gives good reference for optimal design and control of this metamorphic parallel mechanism in different applications using two phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gan DM, Dai JS, Liao QZ (2009) Mobility change in two types of metamorphic parallel mechanisms. ASME J Mech Robot 1:041007-1–041007-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Merlet JP (2008) Parallel robots, 2nd edn. Springer, The Netherlands

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Gan DM, Dai JS, Caldwell DG (2011) Constraint-based limb synthesis and mobility-change aimed mechanism construction. ASME J Mech Des 133(5):051001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dai JS, Rees JJ (1998) Mobility in metamorphic mechanisms of foldable/erectable kinds. In: Proceeding of 25th ASME biennial mechanisms and robotics conference, Atlanta, GA

  5. Wohlhart K (1996) Kinematotropic Linkages. In: Lenarcic J, Parenti-Castelli V (eds) Advances in robot kinematics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 359–368

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Parise JJ, Howell LL, Magleby SP (2000) Ortho-planar mechanisms. In: Proceeding of 26th biennial mechanisms and robotics conference, Baltimore, MD, Paper No. DETC2000/MECH-14193

  7. Chen IM, Li SH, Cathala A (2003) Mechatronic design and locomotion of amoebot—a metamorphic underwater vehicle. J Robot Syst 20(6):307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai JS, Rees JJ (2005) Matrix representation of topological changes in metamorphic mechanisms. ASME J Mech Des 127(4):837–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuo CH, Yan HS (2007) On the mobility and configuration singularity of mechanisms with variable topologies. ASME J Mech Des 129:617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fanghella P, Galletti C, Giannotti E (2006) Parallel robots that change their group of motion. Advances in robot kinematics. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 49–56

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang KT, Dai JS, Fang YF (2010) Topology and constraint analysis of phase change in the metamorphic chain and its evolved mechanism. ASME J Mech Des 132(12):121001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kong X, Gosselin CM, Richard PL (2007) Type synthesis of parallel mechanisms with multiple operation modes. ASME J Mech Des 129(7):595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsai MS, Yuan WH (2010) Inverse dynamics analysis for a 3-PRS parallel mechanism based on a special decomposition of the reaction forces. Mech Mach Theory 45:1491–1508

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Taghvaeipour A, Angeles J, Lessard L (2013) Constraint-wrench analysis of robotic manipulators. Multibody Syst Dyn 29(2):139–168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsai LW (2000) Solving the inverse dynamics of a Stewart–Gough manipulator by the principle of virtual work. J Mech Des 122:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li M, Huang T, Mei JP, Zhao XM, Chetwynd DG, Hu SJ (2005) Dynamic formulation and performance comparison of the 3-DOF modules of two reconfigurable PKMs—the Tricept and the TriVariant. ASME J Mech Des 127(6):1129–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dasgupta B, Choudhury P (1999) A general strategy based on the Newton–Euler approach for the dynamic formulation of parallel manipulators. Mech Mach Theory 34:801–824

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Khalil W, Guegan S (2004) Inverse and direct dynamic modeling of Gough–Stewart robots. IEEE Trans Robot 20(4):754–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan WA, Krovi VN, Saha SK, Angeles J (2005) Recursive kinematics and inverse dynamics for a planar 3R parallel manipulator. J Dyn Syst Meas Contr 127:529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Staicu S (2009) Recursive modeling in dynamics of Agile Wrist spherical parallel robot. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 25:409–416

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y, Xu Q (2005) Kinematics and inverse dynamics analysis for a general 3-PRS spatial parallel mechanism. Robotica 23:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsai LW (1993) Robot analysis: the mechanics of serial and parallel manipulators. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gosselin CM (1993) Parallel computational algorithms for the kinematics and dynamics of parallel manipulators. Proc ICRA N Y 1:883–888

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yuan WH, Tsai MS (2014) A novel approach for forward dynamic analysis of 3-PRS parallel manipulator with consideration of friction effect. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 30:315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gan DM, Dai JS, Dias J, Seneviratne LD (2013) Unified kinematics and singularity analysis of a metamorphic parallel mechanism with bifurcated motion. ASME J Mech Robot 5(3):041104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gan DM, Dai JS, Dias J, Seneviratne LD (2013) Reconfigurability and unified kinematics modeling of a 3rTPS metamorphic parallel mechanism with perpendicular constraint screws. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(4):121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gan DM, Dias J, Seneviratne LD (2013) Unified inverse dynamics of variable topologies of a metamorphic parallel mechanism using screw theory. In: Proceeding of ASME 2013 IDETC, Portland, USA, August 4–7, 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 51375058 and 51205016), the New Century Excellent Talents in University (Project No. NCET-12-0796), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Project No. 20120005110008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongming Gan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gan, D., Dai, J.S., Dias, J. et al. Joint force decomposition and variation in unified inverse dynamics analysis of a metamorphic parallel mechanism. Meccanica 51, 1583–1593 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0216-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0216-y

Keywords

Navigation