References
Baiocchi C, Comincioli V, Maione U (1975) Unconfined flow through porous media. Meccanica 10(3):151–155
Benjamin TB, Lighthill MJ (1954) On cnoidal waves and bores. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 224:448–460
Bennet A (2006) Lagrangian fluid dynamics. Cambridge monographs on mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Boussinesq JV (1871) Théorie de l’intumescence liquide appelée “onde solitaire” ou “de translation”, se propageant dans un canal rectangulaire. C R Acad Sci 72:755–759
Cenedese A (2003) Meccanica dei fluidi. McGraw-Hill, Milano
Chapuis RP, Chenaf D, Bussière B, Aubertin M, Crespo R (2001) A user’s approach to assess numerical codes for saturated and unsaturated seepage conditions. Can Geotech J 38:1113–1126
Chenaf D, Chapuis RP (2007) Seepage face height, water table position, and well efficiency at steady state. Ground Water 45(2):168–177
Collins RE (1999) Mathematical methods for physicists and engineers. Dover, Mineola, New York
Crank J (1984) Free and moving boundary problems. Oxford University Press, New York
Cryer CW, Fetter H (1977) The numerical solution of axisymmetric free boundary porous flow well problems using variational inequalities. M.R.C. Techn. Rep. 1761, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Di Nucci C (2011) Steady free-surface flow in porous media: generalized Dupuit-Fawer equations. J Hydraul Res 49(6):821–823
Di Nucci C, Russo Spena A, Todisco MT (2007) On the non-linear unsteady water flow in open channels. Nuovo Cimento B 122(3):237–255
Harr ME (1962) Groundwater and seepage. McGraw-Hill, New York
Knight JH (2001) Improving the Dupuit-Forchheimer groundwater free surface approximation. Adv Water Resour 28:1048–1056
Logan JD (2006) A first course in differential equations. Springer Science+Business Media, New York
Lorenzi A (1975) Laminar, turbulent, and transition flow in porous sintered media. Meccanica 10(2):75–77
Marchi E (1963) Contributo allo studio del risalto ondulato. G Genio Civ 101(9):466–476
Matthew GD (1991) Higher order one-dimensional equations of potential flow in open channels. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers, Part 2—Research and theory, vol 91, pp 187–201
Neuman SP, Witherspoon PA (1970) Finite element method analyzing steady seepage with a free surface. Water Resour Res 6(3):889–897
Rayleigh L (1876) On waves. Philos Mag 5(1):257–279
Roscoe Moss Company (1990) Handbook of ground water development. Wiley, New York
Schneebeli G (1966) Hydraulique souterraine. Eyrolles, Paris
Valiani A, Caleffi V (2003) Effects of free surface curvature on radial, inviscid flows. In: Proceedings international symposium of shallow flows, Delft, The Netherlands, vol 2, pp 199–206
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
To determine the velocity vector field v, the following Picard iteration [3, 15] can be used. This procedure, similar to Matthew’s method [18], is an alternative to the method proposed by Valiani and Caleffi [23]. Valiani and Caleffi’s procedure is based on a power expansion of the harmonic stream function associated with the velocity vector field v [2, 4, 12, 17, 20].
Setting as a first approximation:
the irrotationality condition is automatically satisfied. The solenoidality condition is verified if and only if the following first-order term is considered nil:
Equation (A.2) defines the approximation order associated with Eq. (A.1). The second approximation of the velocity vector field v can be deduced by setting:
where f 2(r,z) a function unknown a priori. From the solenoidality condition, it follows that:
from which:
The kinematic condition at the base (v z =0 at EA) corresponds to g 2(r)=0. In conclusion, the second approximation of the velocity vector field v is given as follows:
The velocity vector field expressed by Eq. (A.6) is solenoidal. The velocity vector field itself is irrotational if and only if the following second-order terms are considered nil:
Equation (A.7) defines the approximation order associated with Eq. (A.6). The third approximation of the velocity vector field v can be deduced by setting:
From the irrotationality condition, it follows that:
Given that:
the function g 3(r) takes the following form:
and the third approximation of the velocity vector field v is expressed by Eqs. (3) and (4). This procedure can be extended to any required degree of accuracy. For example, it is easy to verify that the fourth approximation of the velocity vector field v is given as:
while the closure hypotheses associated with Eqs. (A.12) and (A.13) are given as follows:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Nucci, C. A free boundary problem: steady axisymmetric potential flow. Meccanica 48, 1805–1810 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-013-9703-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-013-9703-1