Abstract
The paper addresses bifurcation in constraint singularities in connection with structural parameters of parallel mechanisms. The new formulae of mobility, connectivity, overconstraint and redundancy of parallel robots, recently proposed by the author, are used to characterize the bifurcation in constraint singularities. By using these formulae, we have demonstrated that, in a constraint singularity, the instantaneous values of mobility, connectivity of the moving platform and degree of overconstraint increase with no changes in limb connectivity. When bifurcation occurs in a constraint singularity, the mechanism can reach different branches characterized by different independent motions of the moving platform. Bifurcation in constraint singularities is easily identified by inspection with no need to calculate the augmented Jacobian.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Di Gregorio R, Parenti-Castelli V (2002) Mobility analysis of the 3-UPU parallel mechanism assembled for a pure translational motion. Trans ASME J Mech Des 124:259–264
Fanghella P, Galletti C, Giannotti E (2006) Parallel robots that change their group of motion. In: Lenarčič J, Roth B (eds) Advances in robot kinematics: mechanisms and motion. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 49–56
Gogu G (2005) Mobility of mechanisms: a critical review. Mech Mach Theory 40:1068–1097
Gogu G (2005) Chebychev-Grubler-Kutzbach’s criterion for mobility calculation of multi-loop mechanisms revisited via theory of linear transformation“s. Eur J Mech A, Solids, 24:427–441
Gogu G (2005) Mobility and spatiality of parallel robots revisited via theory of linear transformations. Eur J Mech A, Solids, 24:690–711
Gogu G (2005) Mobility criterion and overconstraints of parallel manipulators. In: Proceedings of international workshop on computational kinematics, Cassino, Italy
Gogu G (2008) Structural synthesis of parallel robots. Springer, Dordrecht
Gogu G (2008) Constraint singularities and the structural parameters of parallel robots. In: Lenarčič J, Wenger P (eds) Advances in robot kinematics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–28
Han C, Kim J, Kim J, Park FC (2002) Kinematic sensitivity analysis of the 3-UPU parallel mechanism. Mech Mach Theory 37:787–798
Ionescu TG (2003) Terminology for mechanisms and machine science. Mech Mach Theory 38:597–901
Joshi SA, Tsai LW (2002) Jacobian analysis of limited-DOF parallel manipulators. Trans ASME J Mech Des 124:254–258
Li Q, Hervé JM (2009) Parallel mechanisms with bifurcation of Schoenflies motion. IEEE Trans Robot, 25:158–164
Liu G, Lou Y, Li Z (2003) Singularities of parallel manipulators: a geometric treatment. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19(4):579–594
Racila L, Dahan M (2010) Spatial properties of Wohlhart symmetric mechanism. Meccanica, 45(4):153–165
Tsai L-W (1996) Kinematics of a three-dof platform with three extensible limbs. In: Lenarčič J, Parenti-Castelli V (eds) Advances in robot kinematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 401–410
Wohlhart K (1996) Kinematotropic linkages. In: Lenarčič J, Parenti-Castelli V (eds) Advances in robot kinematics. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 359–368
Wolf A, Shoham M (2003) Investigation of parallel manipulators using linear complex approximation. Trans ASME J Mech Des 125:564–572
Wolf A, Shoham M, Park FC (2002) Investigation of singularities and self-motions of the 3-UPU robot. In: Lenarčič J, Thomas F (eds) Advances in robot kinematics. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 165–174
Zlatanov D, Bonev IA, Gosselin CM (2002) Constraint singularities of parallel mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Washington, DC, USA, pp 496–502
Zlatanov D, Bonev IA, Gosselin CM (2002) Constraint singularities as configuration space singularities. In: Lenarčič J, Thomas F (eds) Advances in robot kinematics. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gogu, G. Bifurcation in constraint singularities and structural parameters of parallel mechanisms. Meccanica 46, 65–74 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-010-9384-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-010-9384-y