Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative epigenetic analysis of Oct4 regulatory region in RA-induced differentiated NT2 cells under adherent and non-adherent culture conditions

  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oct4 is a POU domain homeobox gene, expressed in undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells and is quickly down-regulated upon induction of differentiation. Transcriptional repression of Oct4 is followed by pronounced epigenetic changes on the regulatory region of the gene. Oct4 has a long upstream regulatory region of about 2,600 bp, consisting of proximal enhancer (PE), distal enhancer (DE), and proximal promoter (PP). In this study, we induced differentiation of a human embryonic carcinoma cell line, NT2, under two different adherent and non-adherent culture conditions, and compared histone modifications as the epigenetic marks on the regulatory region of Oct4 gene after 3 days of differentiation. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with real-time PCR technique, it was shown that the after induction of differentiation the repressive epigenetic marks of hypoacetylation and methylation on lysine-9 of histone H3 occurred very effectively on the upstream of Oct4, especially in PP region. Also, comparing the two culturing systems it was shown that methylation of lysine-9 of H3 histone was more drastic in PE region of adherent cells rather than suspension cells. This epigenetic profile was in agreement with the difference observed in the expression level of Oct4 in these two culturing systems. The current study clearly shows the effective role of cell culture condition on the epigenetic regulation of gene expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K, Niwa H, Klewe-Nebenius D, Chambers I, Scholer H, Smith A (1998) Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 95:379–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan GJ, Chang ZY, Schöler HR, Pei D (2002) Stem cell pluripotency and transcription factor Oct4. Cell Res 12:321–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shi G, Jin Y (2010) Role of Oct4 in maintaining and regaining stem cell pluripotency. Stem Cell Res Ther 1:39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schöler HR, Ruppert S, Suzuki N, Chowdhury K, Gruss P (1990) New type of POU domain in germ line-specific protein Oct-4. Nature 344:435–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips K, Luisi B (2000) The virtuoso of versatility: POU proteins that flex to fit. J Mol Biol 302:1023–1039

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeom Y, Fuhrmann G, Ovitt C, Brehm A, Ohbo K, Gross M, Hubner K, Scholer H (1996) Germline regulatory element of Oct4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells. Integrated Ann Indexes 122:881–894

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nordhoff V, Hubner K, Bauer A, Orlova I, Malapetsa A, Scholer HR (2001) Comparative analysis of human, bovine, and murine Oct4 upstream promoter sequences. Mamm Genome 12:309–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ovitt CE, Scholer HR (1998) The molecular biology of Oct-4 in the early mouse embryo. Mol Human Reprod 4:1021–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Okazawa H, Okamoto K, Ishino F, Ishino-Kaneko T, Takeda S, Toyoda Y, Muramatsu M, Hamada H (1991) The oct3 gene, a gene for an embryonic transcription factor, is controlled by a retinoic acid repressible enhancer. EMBO J 10:2997–3005

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoorlemmer J, van PA, van Den Eijnden M, Jonk L, Pals C, Kruijer W (1994) Characterization of a negative retinoic acid response element in the murine Oct4 promoter. Mol Cell Biol 14:1122–1136

  11. Ben-Shushan E, Pikarsky F, Klar A, Bergman Y (1993) Extinction of Oct-3/4 gene expression in embryonal carcinoma* fibroblast somatic cell hybrids is accompanied by changes in the methylation status, chromatin structure, and transcriptional activity of the Oct-3/4 upstream region. Mol Cell Biol 13:891–901

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Shushan E, Sharir H, Pikarsky F, Bergman Y (1995) A dynamic balance between ARP-1/COUP-TFII, EAR-3/Coup-TFI, and retinoic acid receptor: retinoid X receptor hetero dimers regulates Oct3/4 expression in embryonal carcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol 15:1034–1048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shahoseini M, Taei A, Mehrjardi NZ, Salekdeh GH, Baharvand H (2010) Epigenetic analysis of human embryonic cells during RA-induced neural differentiation. Biochem Cell Biol 88:527–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman N, Gerson A, Fang J, Li E, Zhang Y, Shinkai Y, Cedar H, Bergman Y (2006) G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 8:188–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kellner S, Kikyo N (2010) Transcriptional regulation of the Oct4 gene, a master gene of pluripotency. Histol Histopathol 25:405–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hake SB, Garcia BA, Duncan EM, Kauer M, Dellaire G, Shabanowitz J, Bazett-Jones DP, Allis CD, Hunt DF (2006) Expression patterns and post-translational modifications associated with mammalian histone H3 variants. J Biol Chem 281:559–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shahhoseini M, Favaedi R, Baharvand H, Sharma V, Stunnenberg HG (2010) Evidence for a dynamic role of the linker histone variant H1x during retinoic acid-induced differentiation of NT2 cells. FEBS Lett 584:4661–4664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-∆∆Ct method. Methods 25:402–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahl JA, Collas P (2007) Q2ChIP, a quick and quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, unravels epigenetic dynamics of developmentally regulated genes in human carcinoma cells. Stem Cells 25:1037–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Przyborski SA, Christie VB, Hayman MW, Stewart R, Horrocks GM (2004) Human embryonal carcinoma stem cells: models of embryonic development in humans. Stem Cells Dev 13:400–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Przyborski SA, Smith S, Wood A (2003) Transcriptional profiling of neuronal differentiation by human embryonal carcinoma stem cells in vitro. Stem Cells 21:459–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Deb-Rinker P, Ly D, Jezierski A, Sikorska M, Walker PR (2005) Sequential DNA methylation of the Nanog and Oct-4 upstream regions in human NT2 cells during neuronal differentiation. J Biol Chem 280:6257–6260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Horrocks GM, Lauder L, Stewart R, Przyborski SA (2003) Formation of neurospheres from human embryonal carcinoma stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 304:411–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Megiorni F, Mora B, Indovina P, Mazzilli MC (2005) Expression of neuronal markers during NTera2/cloneD1 differentiation by cell aggregation method. Neurosci Lett 373:105–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to dedicate this article to the memory of Dr. Saeid Kazemi Ashtiani, the late founder of Royan Institute. This project was financially supported by the Grant # 169 of Royan Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, Reproductive Biomedicine Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, P.O. Box 19395-4644, Tehran, Iran

    Raha Favaedi & Maryam Shahhoseini

  2. Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Biomedicine Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Akhoond

Authors
  1. Raha Favaedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maryam Shahhoseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Reza Akhoond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Shahhoseini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Favaedi, R., Shahhoseini, M. & Akhoond, M.R. Comparative epigenetic analysis of Oct4 regulatory region in RA-induced differentiated NT2 cells under adherent and non-adherent culture conditions. Mol Cell Biochem 363, 129–134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-011-1165-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-011-1165-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation