Skip to main content
Log in

p-Nuclearity in a New Perspective

  • Published:
Letters in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this Letter we try to settle some confused points concerning the use of the notion of p-nuclearity in the mathematical and physical literature, pointing out that the nuclearity index in the physicists’ sense vanishes for any p> 1. Our discussion of these issues suggests a new perspective, in terms of ε-entropy and operator spaces, which might permit connections to be drawn between phase space criteria and quantum energy inequalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Akashi (1990) ArticleTitleThe asymptotic behavior of ε-entropy of a compact positive operator J. Math. Anal. Appl 153 250–257 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-247X(90)90276-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amari, S.-I. and Nagaoka, H.: Methods of Information Geometry, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001. See also a remark at the end of a paper by one of the authors: Ojima, I., Temperature as order parameter of broken scale invariance, Publ. RIMS 40 (2004), 731–756.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. P. Blecher (1996) ArticleTitleA Generalization of Hilbert modules J. Funct. Anal 136 365–421 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jfan.1996.0034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Buchholz (1996) ArticleTitlePhase space properties of local observables and structure of scaling limits Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré – Physique théorique 64 433–459

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Buchholz C. D’Antoni (1995) ArticleTitlePhase space properties of charged fields in theories of local observables Rev. Math. Phys 7 527–557 Occurrence Handle10.1142/S0129055X95000219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Buchholz C. D’Antoni R. Longo (1990) ArticleTitleNuclear maps and modular structures II: Applications to quantum field theory Commun. Math. Phys 129 115–138

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Buchholz P. Jacobi (1987) ArticleTitleOn the nuclearity condition for massless fields Lett. Math. Phys 13 313–323 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00401160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Buchholz P. Junglas (1989) ArticleTitleOn the existence of equilibrium states in local quantum field theory Commun. Math. Phys 121 255–270 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01217805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Buchholz M. Porrmann (1990) ArticleTitleHow small is the phase space in quantum field theory? Ann Inst Henri Poincaré – Physique Théorique 52 237–257

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Buchholz E.H. Wichmann (1986) ArticleTitleCausal independence and the energy-level density of states in local quantum field theory Commun Math Phys 106 321–344 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01454978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Antoni, C. and Hollands, S.: Nuclearity, local quasiequivalence and split property for Dirac quantum fields in curved spacetime, 2004.[arXiv:math-ph/0106028 v3]

  12. E. Effros Z.-J. Ruan (2000) Operator Spaces Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. P. Eveson C. J. Fewster R. Verch (2005) ArticleTitleQuantum inequalities in quantum mechanics Ann. Henri Poincaré 6 1–30 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00023-005-0197-9 Occurrence HandleMR2119354

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Fewster, C. J. and Hollands, S. Quantum energy inequalities in two-dimensional conformal field theory. [arXiv:math-ph/0412028].

  15. Fidaleo, F.: Operator space structures and the split property, J. Operator Theory31: 1994), 207–218. See also Fidaleo, F.: On the split property for inclusions of W*-algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.130 (2002), 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Haag (1996) Local Quantum Physics EditionNumber2 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Berlin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Haag J. A. Swieca (1965) ArticleTitleWhen does a quantum field theory describe particles? Commun. Math. Phys 1 308–320 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01645906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jarchow, H.: Locally Convex Spaces, B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1981.

  19. S. Mohrdieck (2002) ArticleTitlePhase space structure and short distance behavior of local quantum field theories J. Math. Phys 43 3565–3574 Occurrence Handle10.1063/1.1486262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Pietsch (1972) Nuclear Locally Convex Spaces Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Berlin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Pisier (2003) Introduction to Operator Space Theory Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Schauder (1927) ArticleTitleZur Theorie stetiger Abbildungen in Funktionalräumen Math. Z 26 47–65 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01475440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Schumann (1996) ArticleTitleOperator ideals and the statistical independence in quantum field theory Lett. Math. Phys 37 249–271

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Singer (1970) Bases in Banach Spaces I Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Fewster.

Additional information

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 81T05, 47B10, 47L25.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fewster, C.J., ojima, I. & Porrmann, M. p-Nuclearity in a New Perspective. Lett Math Phys 73, 1–15 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-005-8445-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-005-8445-y

Keywords

Navigation