Abstract
Inverse modeling techniques for estimating reservoir parameters (e.g., transmissivity, permeability) utilize some dynamic (secondary) information (e.g., hydraulic head or production data at well locations). Ensemble based data assimilation methods are one such class of inverse modeling techniques. Ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) in particular is built around the basic framework of linearly updating a state vector \({\psi ^f}\) to \({\psi ^a}\), based on observed dynamic data. Components of the state vector are reservoir model parameters such as transmissivity, permeability, storativity, porosity, hydraulic head, and phase-saturation. Although EnKF is able to update a large number of parameters successively as data become available, it has some shortcomings. It is optimal only in the cases where multivariate joint distribution describing the relationship between components in the state vector is Gaussian. The relationship between the model parameters and the observed data space is quantified in terms of a covariance function, which is adequate to describe a multi-Gaussian distribution. These assumptions and simplifications may result in updated models that are inconsistent with the prior geology (exhibiting non-Gaussian characteristics) and that, in turn, may yield inaccurate predictions of reservoir performance. The aim of this research work is to propose a novel method for data assimilation which is free from the Gaussian assumptions. This new method can be used to assimilate dynamic data into reservoir models using an ensemble-based approach. Model updates are performed after transforming the model parameters into indicator variables. The indicator transform is insensitive to non-linear operations, and it thus allows us to overcome some of the limitations of the traditional EnKF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson JL (2007) An adaptive covariance inflation error correction algorithm for ensemble filters. Tellus Ser A Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr 59(2):210–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2006.00216.x
Evensen G (2009) Data assimilation—the ensemble Kalman filter. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03711-5
Haugen VE, Naevdal G, Natvik LJ, Evensen G, Berg A, Flornes K (2008) History matching using the ensemble Kalman filter on a north sea field case. SPE J 13(4):382–391. https://doi.org/10.2118/102430-PA
Heidari L, Gervais V, Ravalec ML, Wackernagel H (2013) History matching of petroleum reservoir models by the Ensemble Kalman Filter and parameterization methods. Comput Geosci 55:84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.06.006
Hendricks Franssen HJ, Kinzelbach W (2008) Real-time groundwater flow modeling with the Ensemble Kalman Filter: joint estimation of states and parameters and the filter inbreeding problem. Water Resour Res 44(9):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006505
Hoffman BT, Caers J (2005) History matching under geological control: application to a North Sea Reservoir. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1067–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3610-1_111
Hu LY (2000) Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of Gaussian-related stochastic models. Math Geol 32(1):87–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007506918588
Isaaks E, Srivastava R (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://books.google.com/books?id=vC2dcXFLI3YC
Journel AG (1983) Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions. Math Geol 15(1066):445–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01031292
Journel AG (2013) Fundamentals of geostatistics in five lessons. American Geophysical Union (AGU), Washington, pp 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118667606.ch0
Journel A, Alabert F (1989) Non-Gaussian data expansion in the earth sciences. Terra Nova 1(2):123–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.1989.tb00344.x
Le Ravalec-Dupin M, Noetinger B (2002) Optimization with the gradual deformation method. Math Geol 34(2):125–142. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014408117518
Li L, Srinivasan S, Zhou H, Gomez-Hernandez JJ (2015) Two-point or multiple-point statistics? A comparison between the ensemble Kalman filtering and the ensemble pattern matching inverse methods. Adv Water Resour 86:297–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.014
Luenberger D (1997) Optimization by vector space methods. Professional series. Wiley, New York
Maharaja A (2008) Tigenerator: object-based training image generator. Comput Geosci 34(12):1753–1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.012
Mao S, Journel A (1999) Generation of a reference petrophysical/seismic data set: the Stanford V reservoir. Technical report, Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting, Stanford, CA, 12th annual report
Moradkhani H, Hsu KL, Gupta H, Sorooshian S (2005) Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: sequential data assimilation using the particle filter. Water Resour Res 41(5):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003604
Rubin D, Bernardo J, De Groot M, Lindley D, Smith A (1988) Using the sir algorithm to simulate posterior distributions. Bayesian statistics 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 395–402
Schoniger A, Nowak W, Franssen HH (2012) Parameter estimation by ensemble Kalman filters with transformed data: approach and application to hydraulic tomography. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010462
Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014009426274
Tahmasebi P, Sahimi M, Shirangi MG (2018) Rapid learning-based and geologically consistent history matching. Transp Porous Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1005-6
Tarun K, Sanjay S (2003) Iterative integration of dynamic data in reservoir models. In: Proceedings of SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, pp 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2118/84592-MS
Tavakoli R, Srinivasan S, Wheeler MF (2014) Rapid updating of stochastic models by use of an ensemble-filter approach. SPE J 19(3):500–513. https://doi.org/10.2118/163673-PA
Tolosana-Delgado R, Egozcue J, Schez-Arcilla A, Gmez J (2011) Wave height data assimilation using non-stationary kriging. Comput Geosci 37(3):363–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.05.019
Yadav S, Srinivasan S, Bryant S, Barrera A, et al (2005) History matching using probabilistic approach in a distributed computing environment. In: SPE reservoir simulation symposium. https://doi.org/10.2118/93399-MS
Zhou H, Gmez-Hernndez JJ, Franssen HJH, Li L (2011) An approach to handling non-gaussianity of parameters and state variables in ensemble Kalman filtering. Adv Water Resour 34(7):844–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.04.014
Zhou H, Gomez-Hernandez JJ, Li L (2012) A pattern-search-based inverse method. Water Resour Res 48(3):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011195
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by John and Willie Leone Family chair endowment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, D., Srinivasan, S. Ensemble-Based Assimilation of Nonlinearly Related Dynamic Data in Reservoir Models Exhibiting Non-Gaussian Characteristics. Math Geosci 51, 75–107 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-018-9762-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-018-9762-x